Arboreal habitat structure affects the performance and modes of locomotion of corn snakes (Elaphe guttata).

Arboreal environments pose many functional challenges for animal locomotion including fitting within narrow spaces, balancing on cylindrical surfaces, moving on inclines, and moving around branches that obstruct a straight path. Many species of snakes are arboreal and their elongate, flexible bodies appear well-suited to meet many of these demands, but the effects of arboreal habitat structure on the locomotion of snakes are not well understood. We examined the effects of 108 combinations of surface shape (cylinder vs. rectangular tunnel), surface width, incline, and a row of pegs on the locomotion of corn snakes (Elaphe guttata). Pegs allowed the snakes to move on the widest and steepest surfaces that were impassable without pegs. Tunnels allowed the snakes to move on steeper inclines than cylinders with similar widths. The mode of locomotion changed with habitat structure. On surfaces without pegs, most snakes used two variants of concertina locomotion but always moved downhill using a controlled slide. Snakes used lateral undulation on most surfaces with pegs. The detrimental effects of increased uphill incline were greater than those of increased surface width on maximal velocity. Snakes moved faster in tunnels than on cylinders regardless of whether pegs were present. Depending on the surface width, the addition of pegs to horizontal cylinders and tunnels resulted in 8-24-fold and 1.3-3.1-fold increases in speed, respectively. Thus, pegs considerably enhanced the locomotor performance of snakes, although similar structures such as secondary branches seem likely to impede the locomotion of limbed arboreal animals.

[1]  B. Jayne Kinematics of terrestrial snake locomotion , 1986 .

[2]  C. R. Taylor,et al.  Running Up and Down Hills: Some Consequences of Size , 1972, Science.

[3]  Henry C Astley,et al.  Effects of perch diameter and incline on the kinematics, performance and modes of arboreal locomotion of corn snakes (Elaphe guttata) , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[4]  J. Vilensky,et al.  PRIMATE LOCOMOTION: Utilization and Control of Symmetrical Gaits , 1989 .

[5]  C. Heckrotte Relations of Body Temperature, Size, and Crawling Speed of the Common Garter Snake, Thamnophis s. sirtalis , 1967 .

[6]  J. Losos,et al.  Do Lizards Avoid Habitats in Which Performance Is Submaximal? The Relationship between Sprinting Capabilities and Structural Habitat Use in Caribbean Anoles , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[7]  P. Lemelin,et al.  Origins of primate locomotion: gait mechanics of the woolly opossum. , 2002, American journal of physical anthropology.

[8]  J. D. Davis,et al.  Kinematics and Performance Capacity for the Concertina Locomotion of a Snake (Coluber Constrictor) , 1991 .

[9]  G. E. Goslow,et al.  Electrical activity and relative length changes of dog limb muscles as a function of speed and gait. , 1981, The Journal of experimental biology.

[10]  Robert N. Fisher,et al.  A comparative analysis of clinging ability among pad‐bearing lizards , 1996 .

[11]  J. T. Collins,et al.  A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians: Eastern and Central North America , 1975 .

[12]  A. R. Biknevicius,et al.  Locomotor kinetics and kinematics on inclines and declines in the gray short-tailed opossum Monodelphis domestica , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[13]  B. Jayne,et al.  Effects of incline on speed, acceleration, body posture and hindlimb kinematics in two species of lizard Callisaurus draconoides and Uma scoparia. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  S. Bennet,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of the Speed of Snakes as a Function of Peg Spacing , 1974 .

[15]  B. Jayne,et al.  The effects of surface diameter and incline on the hindlimb kinematics of an arboreal lizard (Anolis sagrei) , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[16]  N. Stevens The effect of branch diameter on primate gait sequence pattern , 2008, American journal of primatology.

[17]  M. Cartmill,et al.  Footfall patterns and interlimb co‐ordination in opossums (Family Didelphidae): evidence for the evolution of diagonal‐sequence walking gaits in primates , 2003 .

[18]  R. Shine,et al.  Life-history adaptations to arboreality in snakes. , 2007, Ecology.

[19]  B. Sinervo,et al.  The effects of morphology and perch diameter on sprint performance of Anolis lizards , 1989 .

[20]  A. F. Bennett,et al.  LOCOMOTOR PERFORMANCE AND ENERGETIC COST OF SIDEWINDING BY THE SNAKE CROTALUS CERASTES , 1992 .

[21]  R. Huey,et al.  EFFECTS OF BODY SIZE AND SLOPE ON SPRINT SPEED OF A LIZARD (STELLIO (AGAMA) STELLIO) , 1982 .

[22]  R. Alexander,et al.  Ecological morphology : integrative organismal biology , 1995 .

[23]  D. Claussen,et al.  Effects of temperature and perch diameter on arboreal locomotion in the snake Elaphe guttata. , 2008, Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological genetics and physiology.

[24]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  The effects of substrate and vertebral number on locomotion in the garter snake Thamnophis elegans , 1997 .

[25]  D. Schmitt Substrate Size and Primate Forelimb Mechanics: Implications for Understanding the Evolution of Primate Locomotion , 2003, International Journal of Primatology.

[26]  B. Jayne,et al.  The Energetic Cost of Limbless Locomotion , 1990, Science.

[27]  A. R. Biknevicius,et al.  The biodynamics of arboreal locomotion: the effects of substrate diameter on locomotor kinetics in the gray short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica) , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[28]  J. Gray,et al.  The Kinetics of Locomotion of the Grass-Snake , 1950 .

[29]  A. Delciellos,et al.  Arboreal walking performance in seven didelphid marsupials as an aspect of their fundamental niche , 2006 .

[30]  B. Jayne Swimming in constricting (Elaphe g. guttata) and nonconstricting (Nerodia fasciata pictiventris) colubrid snakes , 1985 .

[31]  J. Prost A replication study on monkey gaits , 1969 .