A stream classification system for the conterminous United States

Stream classifications are important for understanding stream ecosystem diversity while also serving as tools for aquatic conservation and management. With current rates of land and riverscape modification within the United States (US), a comprehensive inventory and evaluation of naturally occurring stream habitats is needed, as this provides a physical template upon which stream biodiversity is organized and maintained. To adequately represent the heterogeneity of stream ecosystems, such a classification needs to be spatially extensive where multiple stream habitat components are represented at the highest resolution possible. Herein, we present a multi-layered empirically-driven stream classification system for the conterminous US, constructed from over 2.6 million stream reaches within the NHDPlus V2 stream network. The classification is based on emergent natural variation in six habitat layers meaningful at the stream-reach resolution: size, gradient, hydrology, temperature, network bifurcation, and valley confinement. To support flexibility of use, we provide multiple alternative approaches to developing classes and report uncertainty in classes assigned to stream reaches. The stream classification and underlying data provide valuable resources for stream conservation and research.Design Type(s)modeling and simulation objective • process-based data transformation objectiveMeasurement Type(s)habitatTechnology Type(s)computational modeling techniqueFactor Type(s)Sample Characteristic(s)United States of America • streamMachine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data (ISA-Tab format)

[1]  J. Higgins,et al.  Identifying freshwater conservation priorities in the Upper Yangtze River Basin , 2011 .

[2]  G. Jenks.  The Data Model Concept in Statistical Mapping , 1967 .

[3]  Travis O. Brenden,et al.  A River Valley Segment Classification of Michigan Streams Based on Fish and Physical Attributes , 2008 .

[4]  Adrian E. Scheidegger,et al.  Horton's Laws of Stream Lengths and Drainage Areas , 1968 .

[5]  Ralph Mac Nally,et al.  Bayesian clustering with AutoClass explicitly recognises uncertainties in landscape classification , 2007 .

[6]  M. Delong,et al.  The riverine ecosystem synthesis: biocomplexity in river networks across space and time , 2006 .

[7]  Paul W. Seelbach,et al.  Classifying Regional Variation in Thermal Regime Based on Stream Fish Community Patterns , 2003 .

[8]  Vincent L. Versace,et al.  Hydrologic Landscape Regionalisation Using Deductive Classification and Random Forests , 2014, PloS one.

[9]  C. Frissell,et al.  A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context , 1986 .

[10]  T. Beechie,et al.  Predicting River Floodplain and Lateral Channel Migration for Salmon Habitat Conservation 1 , 2007 .

[11]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[12]  D. Carlisle,et al.  Classification of California streams using combined deductive and inductive approaches: Setting the foundation for analysis of hydrologic alteration , 2017 .

[13]  William H. McDowell,et al.  Global abundance and size distribution of streams and rivers , 2012 .

[14]  Mark J. Kennard,et al.  CLASSIFICATION OF FLOW REGIMES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW ASSESSMENT IN REGULATED RIVERS: THE HUAI RIVER BASIN, CHINA , 2012 .

[15]  Stef van Buuren,et al.  MICE: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R , 2011 .

[16]  C. Chu,et al.  Linking the thermal regimes of streams in the Great Lakes Basin, Ontario, to landscape and climate variables , 2009 .

[17]  Nick Marsh,et al.  Classification of natural flow regimes in Australia to support environmental flow management , 2010 .

[18]  Charles J Vörösmarty,et al.  Geomorphometric attributes of the global system of rivers at 30-minute spatial resolution , 2000 .

[19]  R R Sokal,et al.  Classification: Purposes, Principles, Progress, Prospects , 1974, Science.

[20]  Scott P. Sowa,et al.  A GAP ANALYSIS AND COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION STRATEGY FOR RIVERINE ECOSYSTEMS OF MISSOURI , 2007 .

[21]  D. Rosgen.  A classification of natural rivers , 1994 .

[22]  P. Steen,et al.  Classification Tree Models for Predicting Distributions of Michigan Stream Fish from Landscape Variables , 2008 .

[23]  Julian D. Olden,et al.  A framework for hydrologic classification with a review of methodologies and applications in ecohydrology , 2012 .

[24]  S. Kao,et al.  A stream classification system to explore the physical habitat diversity and anthropogenic impacts in riverscapes of the eastern United States , 2018, PloS one.

[25]  N. Poff,et al.  A hydrogeography of unregulated streams in the United States and an examination of scale‐dependence in some hydrological descriptors , 1996 .

[26]  Thomas C Winter,et al.  Delineation and Evaluation of Hydrologic-Landscape Regions in the United States Using Geographic Information System Tools and Multivariate Statistical Analyses , 2004, Environmental management.

[27]  R. Mcmanamay,et al.  Identifying non-reference sites to guide stream restoration and long-term monitoring. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[28]  A. St‐Hilaire,et al.  A Classification of Stream Water Temperature Regimes in the Conterminous USA , 2016 .

[29]  S. Melles,et al.  Review of theoretical developments in stream ecology and their influence on stream classification and conservation planning , 2012 .

[30]  J. Wiens.  Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water , 2002 .

[31]  C. Greene,et al.  Tributary streams create spatial discontinuities in habitat, biological productivity, and diversity in mainstem rivers , 2006 .

[32]  Joanna B. Whittier,et al.  Importance of Understanding Landscape Biases in USGS Gage Locations: Implications and Solutions for Managers , 2014 .

[33]  Daren M. Carlisle,et al.  Predicting thermal reference conditions for USA streams and rivers , 2012, Freshwater Science.

[34]  A. N. Strahler.  Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology , 1957 .

[35]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[36]  Thermal regime metrics and quantifying their uncertainty for North American streams , 2018 .

[37]  Jane Elith,et al.  Use of generalised dissimilarity modelling to improve the biological discrimination of river and stream classifications , 2011 .

[38]  W. Junk.  The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems , 1989 .

[39]  P. Angermeier,et al.  Fish community and bioassessment responses to stream network position , 2011, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[40]  C. Revenga,et al.  Fragmentation and Flow Regulation of the World's Large River Systems , 2005, Science.

[41]  Tyler Wagner,et al.  A regional neural network ensemble for predicting mean daily river water temperature , 2014 .

[42]  P. Döll,et al.  High‐resolution mapping of the world's reservoirs and dams for sustainable river‐flow management , 2011 .

[43]  S. Wenger,et al.  A landscape scale valley confinement algorithm: Delineating unconfined valley bottoms for geomorphic, aquatic, and riparian applications , 2014 .

[44]  H. B. N. Hynes,et al.  The stream and its valley , 1975 .

[45]  Shih-Chieh Kao,et al.  Updating the US hydrologic classification: an approach to clustering and stratifying ecohydrologic data , 2014 .

[46]  Anthony R. Olsen,et al.  The Stream‐Catchment (StreamCat) Dataset: A Database of Watershed Metrics for the Conterminous United States , 2016 .