Caesarean Section Rate and Frequencies of Indications Using Robson–Ten Classifications
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] I. Sohail,et al. Auditing the cesarean section rate by Robson’s ten group classification system at Tertiary Care Hospital. , 2020 .
[2] Barbara L. Welther,et al. The impact , 1995 .
[3] D. Yusef,et al. The impact of cesarean section on neonatal outcomes at a university-based tertiary hospital in Jordan , 2019, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.
[4] W. Cheng,et al. The risk of abnormal placentation and hemorrhage in subsequent pregnancy following primary elective cesarean delivery , 2020, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.
[5] A. Kant,et al. Classification of cesarean section through Robson criteria: an emerging concept to audit the increasing cesarean section rate , 2018, International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[6] B. Okusanya,et al. Effect of training on the knowledge and use of the partograph for low risk pregnancies among health workers in a tertiary hospital in Lagos State, Nigeria , 2018 .
[7] F. Barros,et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections , 2018, The Lancet.
[8] S. Fatima,et al. CAESARIAN SECTIONS: FREQUENCY AND INDICATIONS AT PERIPHERAL TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL , 2018 .
[9] Rubina Izhar,et al. Adoption of Robson's Ten Group Classification System (RTGCS) to Analyse Caesarean Section Rates at a Tertiary Care Centre in Pakistan , 2018, ANNALS OF ABBASI SHAHEED HOSPITAL AND KARACHI MEDICAL & DENTAL COLLEGE.
[10] B. Horta,et al. Maternal complications and cesarean section without indication: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, Revista de saude publica.
[11] Y. Khang,et al. Rising trends and inequalities in cesarean section rates in Pakistan: Evidence from Pakistan Demographic and Health Surveys, 1990-2013 , 2017, PloS one.
[12] Sadia Ali,et al. EFFECTIVENESS OF NIFEDIPINE IN EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION , 2017 .
[13] A. Samba,et al. A Review of Caesarean Sections Using the Ten-group Classification System (Robson Classification) in the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH), Accra, Ghana , 2016 .
[14] Jun Zhang,et al. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014 , 2016, PloS one.
[15] R. Mikolajczyk,et al. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates , 2015, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[16] N. Maitra,et al. Examining Cesarean Delivery Rates Using the Robson’s Ten-group Classification , 2016, The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India.
[17] M. Robson,et al. Quality assurance: The 10‐Group Classification System (Robson classification), induction of labor, and cesarean delivery , 2015, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.
[18] J. Ford,et al. Variation in hospital caesarean section rates for women with at least one previous caesarean section: a population based cohort study , 2015, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.
[19] Y. Cakmak,et al. Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after cesarean section and outcomes in rural area of Anatolia , 2015, International journal of women's health.
[20] M. Naeem,et al. RATE AND INDICATIONS OF ELECTIVE AND EMERGENCY CAESAREAN SECTION; A STUDY IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL OF PESHAWAR. , 2015, Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad : JAMC.
[21] M. Adhi,et al. Rates of caesarian section and trials and success of vaginal birth after caesarean sections in secondary care hospital. , 2015, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association.
[22] M. Torloni,et al. A Systematic Review of the Robson Classification for Caesarean Section: What Works, Doesn't Work and How to Improve It , 2014, PloS one.
[23] C. East,et al. Fetal pulse oximetry for fetal assessment in labour. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.