Head striking during fish capture attempts by Steller sea lions and the potential for using head surge acceleration to predict feeding behavior

After declining by over 80% in the last 30 yr, Steller sea lion Eumetopias jubatus (SSL) populations in Alaska remain low with no sign of recovery. To better examine the potential effects of nutritional stress, foraging studies are needed. Currently available biotelemetry techniques are either incapable of precisely quantifying prey captures or have not been validated for SSLs. Our objectives were to (1) determine whether SSL fish-capture attempts (FCAs) produce a head surge acceleration signal; (2) determine whether acceleration of the head relative to the body (differential) produces a more distinct signal than head acceleration alone (dynamic); and (3) develop a method for predicting FCAs using accelerometry. We attached accelerometers to the head and torso of 2 captive SSLs at the Alaska SeaLife Center and allowed them to feed on live fish. For the first SSL, we used video to classify FCAs during foraging trials and modeled the association between FCAs and para- meters created using both dynamic and differential acceleration. Model coefficients were used to predict FCAs for a second SSL, and the results were compared with video. Head acceleration spikes were found in all FCAs. The dynamic model performed slightly better than the differential model at correctly predicting FCAs. Although the model did not perform exceptionally at identifying individ- ual FCAs, it did predict at least 1 FCA in 96% of fish-chasing events and made only 1 false FCA pre- diction during 392 min of non-foraging. This study demonstrates that head accelerometry is useful for estimating SSL foraging effort.

[1]  H. Bornemann,et al.  Mouthing off about fish capture: Jaw movement in pinnipeds reveals the real secrets of ingestion , 2007 .

[2]  Jason F. Schreer,et al.  STATISTICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DIVING BEHAVIOR , 1995 .

[3]  C. A. Bosta,et al.  Changes in dive profiles as an indicator of feeding success in king and Adélie penguins , 2007 .

[4]  D. Demaster,et al.  Anthropogenic causes of the western Steller sea lion Eumetopias jubatus population decline and their threat to recovery , 2008 .

[5]  D. Costa,et al.  Identifying and quantifying prey consumption using stomach temperature change in pinnipeds , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[6]  Jason F. Schreer,et al.  COMPARATIVE DIVING PATTERNS OF PINNIPEDS AND SEABIRDS , 2001 .

[7]  K. Yoda,et al.  A new technique for monitoring the behaviour of free-ranging Adélie penguins. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[8]  Terrie M. Williams,et al.  The cost of foraging by a marine predator, the Weddell seal Leptonychotes weddellii: pricing by the stroke , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[9]  L. Fritz,et al.  Age-structured modeling reveals long-term declines in the natality of western Steller sea lions. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[10]  Y. Ropert‐Coudert,et al.  Lip-reading in remote subjects: an attempt to quantify and separate ingestion, breathing and vocalisation in free-living animals using penguins as a model , 2002 .

[11]  M. Hindell,et al.  Determining feeding events and prey encounter rates in a southern elephant seal : a method using swim speed and stomach temperature , 2008 .

[12]  Ian L. Boyd,et al.  SELECTING SAMPLING FREQUENCY FOR MEASURING DIVING BEHAVIOR , 1993 .

[13]  Y. Naito,et al.  A fine-scale time budget of Cape gannets provides insights into the foraging strategies of coastal seabirds , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  J. Croxall,et al.  Diving Patterns in Relation to Diet of Gentoo and Macaroni Penguins at South Georgia , 1988 .

[15]  Russel D. Andrews Remotely releasable instruments for monitoring the foraging behaviour of pinnipeds , 1998 .

[16]  Yasuhiko Naito,et al.  New steps in bio-logging science , 2004 .

[17]  T. Loughlin The Steller sea lion : A declining species , 1998 .

[18]  Gerald L. Kooyman,et al.  Genesis and evolution of bio-logging devices: 1963-2002 , 2004 .

[19]  Yasuhiko Naito,et al.  Validation of a device for accurate timing of feeding events in marine animals , 2009, Polar Biology.

[20]  John Calambokidis,et al.  Foraging behavior of humpback whales: kinematic and respiratory patterns suggest a high cost for a lunge , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[21]  C. Bost,et al.  Diel dive depth in penguins in relation to diel vertical migration of prey: whose dinner by candlelight? , 1993 .

[22]  B. L. Boeuf,et al.  Three-dimensional movements and swimming activity of a northern elephant seal. , 2001, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology.

[23]  Patrick J Butler,et al.  Biotelemetry: a mechanistic approach to ecology. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  Joachim Plötz,et al.  SHORT COMMUNICATION CAN WE DETERMINE WHEN MARINE ENDOTHERMS FEED? A CASE STUDY WITH SEABIRDS , 1992 .

[25]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  Pelagic seabirds and the marine environment: foraging patterns of wandering albatrosses in relation to prey availability and distribution , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  T. Loughlin,et al.  Aerial and Land-Based Surveys of Steller Sea Lions (Eumetopias jubatus) , 1999 .

[27]  Yasuhiko Naito,et al.  How can we observe the underwater feeding behavior of endotherms , 2007 .