Random Scale Heterogeneity in Discrete Choice Models

Methods to model preference heterogeneity in discrete choice models continue to receive a significant amount of attention in the literature. The main interest lies in modeling variations in relative sensitivities across respondents, e.g. leading to different valuations of travel time savings (VTTS). Recently however, the question as to what extent the heterogeneity captured by random parameter models is not exclusively preference heterogeneity, but scale heterogeneity, has also attracted attention. In this paper, the authors present a conceptually straightforward modeling framework that jointly allows for random scale heterogeneity and heterogeneity in relative sensitivities. The authors results on two separate datasets show how this leads not only to significant improvements in model fit, but also helps to disentangle the two types of heterogeneity, with obvious benefits for interpretation. Finally, the two case studies also highlight how not accounting for scale heterogeneity may lead to counter-intuitive findings in terms of inter-coefficient correlation.

[1]  Andrew Daly,et al.  Calculating Errors for Measures Derived from Choice Modeling Estimates , 2012 .

[2]  J. Polak,et al.  Non-trading, lexicographic and inconsistent behaviour in stated choice data , 2010 .

[3]  Denzil G. Fiebig,et al.  The Generalized Multinomial Logit Model: Accounting for Scale and Coefficient Heterogeneity , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[4]  John M. Rose,et al.  Allowing for intra-respondent variations in coefficients estimated on repeated choice data , 2009 .

[5]  M. Bierlaire,et al.  Discrete choice models with multiplicative error terms , 2009 .

[6]  Kenneth Train,et al.  Utility in Willingness to Pay Space: A Tool to Address Confounding Random Scale Effects in Destination Choice to the Alps , 2008 .

[7]  John M. Rose,et al.  Asymmetric preference formation in willingness to pay estimates in discrete choice models , 2008 .

[8]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Designing Discrete Choice Experiments: Do Optimal Designs Come at a Price? , 2008 .

[9]  D. Hensher,et al.  Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates , 2005 .

[10]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  Willingness-to-Pay Estimation with Mixed Logit Models: Some New Evidence , 2005 .

[11]  M. Bierlaire,et al.  ESTIMATION OF VALUE OF TRAVEL-TIME SAVINGS USING MIXED LOGIT MODELS , 2005 .

[12]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Evidence on the distribution of values of travel time savings from a six-week diary , 2004 .

[13]  David A. Hensher,et al.  The Mixed Logit Model: the State of Practice and Warnings for the Unwary , 2001 .

[14]  Robert Kohn,et al.  Dissecting the Random Component of Utility , 2002 .

[15]  Juan Antonio Carrasco,et al.  Review and assessment of the nested logit model , 2002 .

[16]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  What If Consumer Experiments Impact Variances as Well as Means? Response Variability as a Behavioral Phenomenon , 2001 .

[17]  Kenneth A. Small,et al.  The Value of Time and Reliability: Measurement from a Value Pricing Experiment , 2001 .

[18]  Edward R. Morey,et al.  Investigating Preference Heterogeneity in a Repeated Discrete-Choice Recreation Demand Model of Atlantic Salmon Fishing , 2000, Marine Resource Economics.

[19]  K. Train,et al.  Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[20]  Peter R. Stopher,et al.  Understanding Travel Behaviour in an Era of Change , 1996 .

[21]  J. Louviere,et al.  The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models , 1993 .

[22]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions , 1990 .

[23]  Takayuki Morikawa,et al.  REVIEW AND PERSPECTIVE OF INCORPORATING STATED PREFERENCE DATA IN TRAVEL DEMAND ANALYSIS , 1990 .

[24]  J. M. Jones,et al.  Removing Heterogeneity Bias from Logit Model Estimation , 1988 .

[25]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[26]  Joel L. Horowitz,et al.  Identification and diagnosis of specification errors in the multinomial logit model , 1981 .

[27]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Formal Choice Models of Informal Choices: What Choice Modeling Research Can (and Can't) Learn from Behavioral Theory , 2008 .

[28]  E. Cherchi Econometric effects of utility order transformations in discrete choice models , 2008 .

[29]  Søren Feodor Nielsen,et al.  DECONVOLUTING PREFERENCES AND ERRORS: A SEMI-NONPARAMETRIC MODEL FOR BINOMIAL PANEL DATA , 2006 .

[30]  Jj Louviere,et al.  Confound it! That pesky little scale constant messes up our convenient assumptions , 2006 .

[31]  Kenneth Train,et al.  Discrete Choice Models in Preference Space and Willingness-to Pay Space , 2005 .

[32]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: The mixed logit model , 2005 .

[33]  W. Greene,et al.  Specification and estimation of the nested logit model: alternative normalisations , 2002 .

[34]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Combining Sources of Preference Data for Modeling Complex Decision Processes , 1999 .

[35]  A. Daly,et al.  MODELS USING MIXED STATED-PREFERENCE AND REVEALED-PREFERENCE INFORMATION. , 1991 .