A Peer Observation of Teaching Process for Faculty who Teach Online

Peer observation of teaching (POT) is a process used to assist faculty who want to improve teaching.  However, it is unclear how to incorporate this practice with online faculty.  Additionally, barriers including time, ambiguity of review processes, and unqualified reviewers can hinder participation in POT activities.  To address these issues a POT process that incorporated recognized standards, communicated the process, trained reviewers, and limited observation times was implemented for online faculty.  Results indicated the quantity of changes made to observed courses were nearly double those of unobserved courses, and observed faculty made 29% more updates than unobserved peer counterparts.  Observed courses experienced a larger percentage of substantial changes (35%) than unobserved course (10%), and substantial changes made by observed faculty (37%) was higher than unobserved faculty (7%).  Reviewers reported that performing observations was an invaluable experience, and recommendations for future policies suggest addressing time, ambiguity, and training issues.

[1]  Deborah Peel,et al.  Peer observation as a transformatory tool?1 , 2005 .

[2]  Simon Lygo-Baker,et al.  Teaching Observations: A Meeting of Minds? , 2006 .

[3]  Raoul A. Arreola,et al.  Developing a Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System , 1995 .

[4]  Hazel Fullerton,et al.  Observation of Teaching , 2003 .

[5]  Jessica L. Jonson,et al.  An Examination of the Implementation of Peer Review of Teaching , 2000 .

[6]  E. Boyer.  Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate , 1990 .

[7]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Peer observation of teaching in the online environment: an action research approach , 2008, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[8]  Isabeau Iqbal,et al.  Academics' resistance to summative peer review of teaching: questionable rewards and the importance of student evaluations , 2013 .

[9]  Jill Cosh,et al.  Peer Observation in Higher Education ‐‐ A Reflective Approach , 1998 .

[10]  Gary F. Kohut,et al.  Peer Observation of Teaching: Perceptions of the Observer and the Observed , 2007 .

[11]  Loo-See Beh,et al.  A Qualitative Review of Literature on Peer Review of Teaching in Higher Education , 2014 .

[12]  Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development,et al.  Organisation for economic cooperation and development , 1998 .

[13]  Kathleen M. Quinlan,et al.  Factors affecting departmental peer collaboration for faculty development: Two cases in context , 2000 .

[14]  David Gosling.  Collaborative Peer-Supported Review of Teaching , 2014 .

[15]  Jacqueline Ann Blackmore.  A Critical Evaluation of Peer Review via Teaching Observation within Higher Education. , 2005 .

[16]  I. Kinchin,et al.  Developing a Peer Observation Program with University Teachers , 2006 .

[17]  Clare Kell,et al.  Peer review of teaching embedded practice or policy‐holding complacency? , 2009 .

[18]  Amani Bell,et al.  The benefits of peer observation of teaching for tutor development , 2008 .

[19]  Susan Shortland.  Feedback within peer observation: continuing professional development and unexpected consequences , 2010 .

[20]  Christine A. Stanley,et al.  Peer review of teaching : a sourcebook , 1999 .

[21]  Larry Keig.  Formative Peer Review of Teaching: Attitudes of Faculty at Liberal Arts Colleges Toward Colleague Assessment , 2000 .

[22]  P. Hutchings,et al.  The peer review of teaching: Progress, issues and prospects , 1996 .

[23]  I. Kinchin,et al.  Peer observation of teaching: The interaction between peer review and developmental models of practice , 2014 .

[25]  Carmel McNaught.  The effectiveness of an institution-wide mentoring program for improving online teaching and learning , 2003, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[26]  J. M. Double,et al.  Developing Higher Education Teaching Skills Through Peer Observation and Collaborative Reflection , 1998 .