Medium Access Control for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks

Cooperative intelligent transport systems (C-ITS), where vehicles cooperate by exchanging messages wirelessly to avoid, for example, hazardous road traffic situations, receive a great deal of attention throughout the world currently. Many C-ITS applications will utilize the wireless communication technology IEEE 802.11p, which offers the ability of direct communication between vehicles, i.e., ad hoc communication, for up to 1000 meters. In this thesis, medium access control (MAC) protocols for vehicular ad hoc networks (VANET) are scrutinized and evaluated. The MAC protocol decides when a station has the right to access the shared communication channel and schedules transmissions to minimize the interference at receiving stations. A VANET is a challenging network for the MAC protocol because the number of stations in is unknown a priori and cannot be bounded. Therefore, the scalability of the MAC method has a major influence on the performance of C-ITS applications. Two different MAC protocols are studied: carrier sense multiple access (CSMA) of 802.11p and self-organizing time division multiple access (STDMA). These two MAC methods are examined with re-spect to the communication requirements and protocol settings arising from C-ITS standardization. Based on these constraints, suitable performance measures are derived such as MAC-to-MAC delay and detection distance, where the former catches both the delay and reliability. In STDMA, the channel access delay is upper-bounded and therefore known before transmission, since regardless of the number of stations within radio range, all stations are always guaranteed timely channel access. In CSMA, the channel access delay is not upper-bounded and it is unknown until transmission commences, as it is based on the instantaneous channel load and stations can experience a random delay when in backoff. The evaluation of CSMA and STDMA is performed through extensive computer simulations, model-ling a 10 km highway with six lanes in each direction. Vehicles travel along the highway and broad-cast position messages periodically with different update rates. Two different channel models have been used during the evaluations, one distinguishing between a receiver being in line-of-sight (LOS) or obstructed LOS (OLOS) from the transceiver, while the other does not consider this. The simulation results, for both channel models, show that CSMA has on average a smaller channel access delay than STDMA. However, the results also reveal that STDMA always achieves a better reliability than CSMA, especially for distances of 100-500 meters between transmitter and receiver. The distance, at which approaching stations receive the first messages from each other, is up to 100 meters longer for STDMA than CSMA. This thesis therefore concludes that STDMA is a very suitable MAC method for VANET-based C-ITS applications.

[1]  Lawrence G. Roberts,et al.  ALOHA packet system with and without slots and capture , 1975, CCRV.

[2]  Flaminio Borgonovo,et al.  ADHOC MAC: New MAC Architecture for Ad Hoc Networks Providing Efficient and Reliable Point-to-Point and Broadcast Services , 2004, Wirel. Networks.

[3]  Fengyuan Ren,et al.  A-ADHOC: An adaptive real-time distributed MAC protocol for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2009, ICC 2009.

[4]  S. Katragadda,et al.  A decentralized location-based channel access protocol for inter-vehicle communication , 2003, The 57th IEEE Semiannual Vehicular Technology Conference, 2003. VTC 2003-Spring..

[5]  Fan Bai,et al.  Mobile Vehicle-to-Vehicle Narrow-Band Channel Measurement and Characterization of the 5.9 GHz Dedicated Short Range Communication (DSRC) Frequency Band , 2007, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[6]  Mukesh Singhal,et al.  Readings in distributed computing systems , 1994 .

[7]  Luca Delgrossi,et al.  Optimal data rate selection for vehicle safety communications , 2008, VANET '08.

[8]  Hannes Hartenstein,et al.  Design methodology and evaluation of rate adaptation based congestion control for Vehicle Safety Communications , 2011, 2011 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC).

[9]  John B. Kenney,et al.  Dedicated Short-Range Communications (DSRC) Standards in the United States , 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[10]  Charles E. Rohrs,et al.  LIMERIC: a linear message rate control algorithm for vehicular DSRC systems , 2011, VANET '11.

[11]  Mitchell Lazarus,et al.  The Great Spectrum Famine , 2010 .

[12]  Dong-Ho Cho,et al.  Performance Analysis on Coexistence of EDCA and Legacy DCF Stations in IEEE 802.11 Wireless LANs , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[13]  Hans Peter Großmann,et al.  Medium Access Concept for VANETs Based on Clustering , 2007, 2007 IEEE 66th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[14]  Xianbo Chen,et al.  SDMA: On The Suitability for VANET , 2008, 2008 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications.

[15]  Raja Sengupta,et al.  Empirical determination of channel characteristics for DSRC vehicle-to-vehicle communication , 2004, VANET '04.

[16]  Riccardo Scopigno,et al.  Mobile Slotted Aloha for Vanets , 2009, 2009 IEEE 70th Vehicular Technology Conference Fall.

[17]  A. Mann,et al.  A new concurrent slot assignment protocol for traffic information exchange , 1988, 38th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference.

[18]  M. Nakagami The m-Distribution—A General Formula of Intensity Distribution of Rapid Fading , 1960 .

[19]  Azim Eskandarian,et al.  A Reliable Link-Layer Protocol for Robust and Scalable Intervehicle Communications , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[20]  Ajay Chandra V. Gummalla,et al.  Wireless medium access control protocols , 2000, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[21]  Fredrik Tufvesson,et al.  Directional Analysis of Vehicle-to-Vehicle Propagation Channels , 2011, 2011 IEEE 73rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[22]  Hang Su,et al.  Clustering-Based Multichannel MAC Protocols for QoS Provisionings Over Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[23]  Antonio Capone,et al.  RR-ALOHA, a Reliable R-ALOHA broadcast channel for ad-hoc inter-vehicle communication networks , 2002 .

[24]  Pravin Varaiya,et al.  Space division multiple access (SDMA) for robust ad hoc vehicle communication networks , 2001, ITSC 2001. 2001 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8585).

[25]  Riccardo Scopigno,et al.  RR-Aloha+: A slotted and distributed MAC protocol for vehicular communications , 2009, 2009 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC).

[26]  Ieee Standards Board IEEE standards for local and metropolitan area networks : overview and architecture , 1990 .

[27]  Norman M. Abramson,et al.  THE ALOHA SYSTEM: another alternative for computer communications , 1899, AFIPS '70 (Fall).

[28]  Yukihiro Tadokoro,et al.  Header reduction to increase the throughput in decentralized TDMA-based vehicular networks , 2009, 2009 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC).

[29]  Bernhard Walke,et al.  DCAP, a decentral channel access protocol: performance analysis , 1991, [1991 Proceedings] 41st IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference.