Some Improvements in State/Parameter Estimation Using the Cell-to-Cell Mapping Technique

Abstract The cell-to-cell-mapping technique (CCMT) models system evolution in terms of probability of transitions within a user-specified time interval (e.g., data-sampling interval) between sets of user-defined parameter/state variable magnitude intervals (cells). The cell-to-cell transition probabilities are obtained from the given linear or nonlinear plant model. In conjunction with monitored data and the plant model, the Dynamic System Doctor (DSD) software package uses the CCMT to determine the probability of finding the unmonitored parameter/state variables in a given cell at a given time recursively from a Markov chain. The most important feature of the methodology with regard to model-based fault diagnosis is that it can automatically account for uncertainties in the monitored system state, inputs, and modeling uncertainties through the appropriate choice of the cells, as well as providing a probabilistic measure to rank the likelihood of faults in view of these uncertainties. Such a ranking is particularly important for risk-informed regulation and risk monitoring of nuclear power plants. The DSD estimation algorithm is based on the assumptions that (a) the measurement noise is uniformly distributed and (b) the measured variables are part of the state variable vector. A new theoretical basis is presented for CCMT-based state/parameter estimation that waives these assumptions using a Bayesian interpretation of the approach and expands the applicability range of DSD, as well as providing a link to the conventional state/parameter estimation schemes. The resulting improvements are illustrated using a point reactor xenon evolution model in the presence of thermal feedback and compared to the previous DSD algorithm. The results of the study show that the new theoretical basis (a) increases the applicability of methodology to arbitrary observers and arbitrary noise distributions in the monitored data, as well as to arbitrary uncertainties in the model parameters; (b) leads to improvements in the estimation speed and accuracy; and (c) allows the estimator to be used for noise reduction in the monitored data. The connection between DSD and conventional state/parameter estimation schemes is shown and illustrated for the least-squares estimator, maximum likelihood estimator, and Kalman filter using a recently proposed scheme for directly measuring local power density in nuclear reactor cores.

[1]  Kil To Chong,et al.  Nonlinear identification of process dynamics using neural networks , 1992 .

[2]  S. Lyashevskiy,et al.  Identification of nonlinear system parameters using describing function approach , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No.97CH36041).

[3]  Henry Stark,et al.  Probability, Random Processes, and Estimation Theory for Engineers , 1995 .

[4]  Zheng-She Liu QR methods of O(N) complexity in adaptive parameter estimation , 1995, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[5]  J. Schnakenberg,et al.  Gardiner: Handbook of Stochastic Methods for Physics, Chemistry and the Natural Sciences/Bass und Stitch: Laser Handbook, Vol. 5 , 1986 .

[6]  J. Devooght,et al.  Probabilistic Reactor Dynamics —I: The Theory of Continuous Event Trees , 1992 .

[7]  Thomas D. Radcliff,et al.  Constant-Temperature Calorimetry for In-Core Power Measurement , 2000 .

[8]  Tunc Aldemir,et al.  Parameter estimation toward fault diagnosis in nonlinear systems using a Markov model of system dynamics , 1997 .

[9]  T. Aldemir,et al.  CONTINUOUS CELL-TO-CELL MAPPING , 1997 .

[10]  W. Wong,et al.  The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation , 1987 .

[11]  J. Chernick,et al.  THE EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON XENON INSTABILITY , 1961 .

[12]  Norman Morrison,et al.  Introduction to Sequential Smoothing and Prediction , 1969 .

[13]  Nils Christophersen,et al.  Monte Carlo filters for non-linear state estimation , 2001, Autom..

[14]  R. J. Patton,et al.  Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems , 1999 .

[15]  R. Marino,et al.  Adaptive observers with arbitrary exponential rate of convergence for nonlinear systems , 1995, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[16]  K. Hjelmstad,et al.  Time-domain parameter estimation algorithm for structures. I: Computational aspects , 1995 .

[17]  Robert Lupton,et al.  Statistics in Theory and Practice , 2020 .

[18]  Rogelio Lozano,et al.  Adaptive control for linear slowly time-varying systems using direct least-squares estimation , 2001, Autom..

[19]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  Decomposition algorithms for on-line estimation with nonlinear models , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 American Control Conference - ACC '94.

[20]  D. J. Mook Estimation and identification of nonlinear dynamic systems , 1988 .

[21]  V. I. Utkin,et al.  Estimation of xenon concentration and reactivity in nuclear reactors using liding mode observers , 2001, Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.01CH37228).

[22]  Iqbal Husain,et al.  Application of a sliding-mode observer for position and speed estimation in switched reluctance motor drives , 2001 .

[23]  Vadim I. Utkin,et al.  Automotive engine diagnosis and control via nonlinear estimation , 1998 .

[24]  Charalambos D. Charalambous,et al.  Maximum likelihood parameter estimation from incomplete data via the sensitivity equations: the continuous-time case , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[25]  C. Gardiner Handbook of Stochastic Methods , 1983 .

[26]  M. Guay,et al.  Optimization and sensitivity analysis for multiresponse parameter estimation in systems of ordinary , 1995 .

[27]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Genetic Algorithms for Estimating Effective Parameters in a Lumped Reactor Model for Reactivity Predictions , 2001 .