Effects of word length and wordlikeness on pseudoword repetition by poor and normal readers

ABSTRACT This Study investigated whether the pseudoword repetition difference between poor and normal readers could be explained by differences in memory for verbal materials or in familiarity with the composition of verbal materials. Dutch second graders and poor readers scoring in the same range on a word-reading test repeated pseudowords that varied in length and wordlikeness. The pseudoword repetition deficit of poor readers reported in the literature was replicated. Although the repetition scores were influenced by pseudoword length and wordlikeness, no interaction with reader group was found, thus indicating that neither variable represented a causal factor in the poor readers' repetition deficit. Statistical correction for reader group differences on a phoneme detection task and an auditory discrimination task made the pseudoword repetition difference disappear. We conclude that the basic problem is unlikely to be with subvocal rehearsal, and that the cause of the repetition deficit is already operative in early, perceptual stages of processing.

[1]  J. Raven Guide to using the Coloured Progressive Matrices. , 1958 .

[2]  Helmer R. Myklebust,et al.  Learning Disabilities: Educational Principles and Practices , 1967 .

[3]  J. Lyle Certain antenatal, perinatal, and developmental variables and reading retardation in middle-class boys. , 1970, Child development.

[4]  T. Ingram,et al.  A Retrospective Study of 82 Children with Reading Disability , 1970, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[5]  The dyslexic child , 1974 .

[6]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Word length and the structure of short-term memory , 1975 .

[7]  Doris J. Johnson Persistent auditory disorders in young dyslexic adults , 1980 .

[8]  P. Tallal Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children , 1980, Brain and Language.

[9]  D Montgomery Do dyslexics have difficulty accessing articulatory information? , 1981, Psychological research.

[10]  J. Godfrey,et al.  Performance of dyslexic children on speech perception tests. , 1981, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[11]  M. Snowling Phonemic deficits in developmental dyslexia , 1981, Psychological research.

[12]  Jane W. Blalock Persistent Auditory Language Deficits in Adults with Learning Disabilities , 1982, Journal of learning disabilities.

[13]  R. Malatesha,et al.  Reading Disorders: Varieties and Treatments , 1982 .

[14]  Helmer R. Myklebust Progress in Learning Disabilities , 1982 .

[15]  V. Mann,et al.  Speech perception and memory coding in relation to reading ability. , 1983, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[16]  M. Kinsbourne,et al.  Topics in Child Neurology , 1983 .

[17]  K. Stanovich Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. , 1986 .

[18]  P Howell,et al.  Segmentation and speech perception in relation to reading skill: a developmental analysis. , 1986, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[19]  H. Catts,et al.  Speech Production/Phonological Deficits in Reading-Disordered Children , 1986, Journal of learning disabilities.

[20]  J. Werker,et al.  Speech perception in severely disabled and average reading children. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[21]  R. Wagner,et al.  The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. , 1987 .

[22]  Patricia Greig Bowers,et al.  Naming Speed and Phonological Awareness: Independent Contributors to Reading Disabilities. , 1988 .

[23]  Hallie Kay Yopp,et al.  The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. , 1988 .

[24]  W. D. Weirdt Speech perception and frequency discrimination in good and poor readers , 1988, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[25]  H. Catts,et al.  Phonological and spatial processing abilities in language- and reading-impaired children. , 1988, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[26]  M. Reed Speech perception and the discrimination of brief auditory cues in reading disabled children. , 1989, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[27]  H. Taylor,et al.  Pseudoword repetition ability in learning-disabled children , 1989, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[28]  S. Brady,et al.  Speech Repetition Abilities in Children Who Differ in Reading Skill , 1989, Language and speech.

[29]  Ludo Verhoeven,et al.  Acquisition of reading in Dutch , 1990 .

[30]  Ludo Verhoeven,et al.  1. Acquisition of Written Dutch: An Introduction , 1990 .

[31]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The influences of number of syllables and wordlikeness on children’s repetition of nonwords , 1991, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[32]  Charles Hulme,et al.  Words, nonwords, and phonological processes: Some comments on Gathercole, Willis, Emslie, and Baddeley , 1991, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[33]  H. Wimmer,et al.  The relationship of phonemic awareness to reading acquisition: More consequence than precondition but still important , 1991, Cognition.

[34]  B. Byrne,et al.  Recognition of phoneme invariance by beginning readers , 1993 .

[35]  Development of memory span for spoken words: The role of rehearsal and item identification processes , 1993 .

[36]  Phonological Processing in Learning Disabled Adolescents , 1993 .

[37]  R. Joshi,et al.  Reading disabilities : diagnosis and component processes , 1993 .

[38]  U. Goswami,et al.  Phonological Skills and Learning to Read , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[39]  H. Wimmer,et al.  Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system , 1993, Applied Psycholinguistics.