Phase of beta-frequency tACS over primary motor cortex modulates corticospinal excitability

The assessment of corticospinal excitability by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials is an established diagnostic tool in neurophysiology and a widely used procedure in fundamental brain research. However, concern about low reliability of these measures has grown recently. One possible cause of high variability of MEPs under identical acquisition conditions could be the influence of oscillatory neuronal activity on corticospinal excitability. Based on research showing that transcranial alternating current stimulation can entrain neuronal oscillations we here test whether alpha or beta frequency tACS can influence corticospinal excitability in a phase-dependent manner. We applied tACS at individually calibrated alpha- and beta-band oscillation frequencies, or we applied sham tACS. Simultaneous single TMS pulses time locked to eight equidistant phases of the ongoing tACS signal evoked MEPs. To evaluate offline effects of stimulation frequency, MEP amplitudes were measured before and after tACS. To evaluate whether tACS influences MEP amplitude, we fitted one-cycle sinusoids to the average MEPs elicited at the different phase conditions of each tACS frequency. We found no frequency-specific offline effects of tACS. However, beta-frequency tACS modulation of MEPs was phase-dependent. Post hoc analyses suggested that this effect was specific to participants with low (<19 Hz) intrinsic beta frequency. In conclusion, by showing that beta tACS influences MEP amplitude in a phase-dependent manner, our results support a potential role attributed to neuronal oscillations in regulating corticospinal excitability. Moreover, our findings may be useful for the development of TMS protocols that improve the reliability of MEPs as a meaningful tool for research applications or for clinical monitoring and diagnosis.

[1]  P. Rieckmann,et al.  Early abnormalities of evoked potentials and future disability in patients with multiple sclerosis , 2006, Multiple sclerosis.

[2]  Helen M. Morgan,et al.  The Role of Beta-Frequency Neural Oscillations in Motor Control , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  A. Oliviero,et al.  The diagnostic value of motor evoked potentials , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  P M Rossini,et al.  Clinical applications of motor evoked potentials. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  F. Wendling,et al.  From Oscillatory Transcranial Current Stimulation to Scalp EEG Changes: A Biophysical and Physiological Modeling Study , 2013, PloS one.

[6]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Ready, Set, Reset: Stimulus-Locked Periodicity in Behavioral Performance Demonstrates the Consequences of Cross-Sensory Phase Reset , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Giacomo Koch,et al.  Ongoing cumulative effects of single TMS pulses on corticospinal excitability: An intra- and inter-block investigation , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  A. Gharabaghi,et al.  Combining TMS and tACS for Closed-Loop Phase-Dependent Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability: A Feasibility Study , 2016, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[9]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  P. Rossini,et al.  Magnetic stimulation: motor evoked potentials. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[11]  D. McCormick,et al.  Endogenous Electric Fields May Guide Neocortical Network Activity , 2010, Neuron.

[12]  Michael T. Jurkiewicz,et al.  Post-movement beta rebound is generated in motor cortex: Evidence from neuromagnetic recordings , 2006, NeuroImage.

[13]  Robert Chen,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation to understand pathophysiology and as potential treatment for neurodegenerative diseases , 2015, Translational Neurodegeneration.

[14]  O. Jensen,et al.  Shaping Functional Architecture by Oscillatory Alpha Activity: Gating by Inhibition , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[15]  A. Riehle,et al.  The ups and downs of beta oscillations in sensorimotor cortex , 2013, Experimental Neurology.

[16]  G. Pfurtscheller Central beta rhythm during sensorimotor activities in man. , 1981, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  Effects of 10Hz and 20Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on motor functions and motor cortical excitability , 2013, Behavioural Brain Research.

[18]  A. Eusebio,et al.  Motor evoked potentials in clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis , 2009, Multiple sclerosis.

[19]  L. Kappos,et al.  Visual and motor evoked potentials in the course of multiple sclerosis. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  D. Schutter,et al.  Brain oscillations and frequency-dependent modulation of cortical excitability , 2011, Brain Stimulation.

[21]  Paolo Maria Rossini,et al.  Motor cortex excitability in Alzheimer's disease: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2003, Annals of neurology.

[22]  Lars Riecke,et al.  Stimulus Presentation at Specific Neuronal Oscillatory Phases Experimentally Controlled with tACS: Implementation and Applications , 2016, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[23]  S. Rossi,et al.  Frequency-Dependent Tuning of the Human Motor System Induced by Transcranial Oscillatory Potentials , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  M. Magistris,et al.  Trial-to-trial size variability of motor-evoked potentials. A study using the triple stimulation technique , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  P. Brown,et al.  Phase Dependency of the Human Primary Motor Cortex and Cholinergic Inhibition Cancelation During Beta tACS , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  J. Krakauer,et al.  The uses and interpretations of the motor-evoked potential for understanding behaviour , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  Jonas Obleser,et al.  Cortical brain states and corticospinal synchronization influence TMS-evoked motor potentials. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  A. Gharabaghi,et al.  Cumulative effects of single TMS pulses during beta-tACS are stimulation intensity-dependent , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[29]  K. Mathewson,et al.  Pulsed Out of Awareness: EEG Alpha Oscillations Represent a Pulsed-Inhibition of Ongoing Cortical Processing , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[30]  V. Romei,et al.  Information-Based Approaches of Noninvasive Transcranial Brain Stimulation , 2016, Trends in Neurosciences.

[31]  D. Saint-Amour,et al.  EEG and neuronavigated single-pulse TMS in the study of the observation/execution matching system: Are both techniques measuring the same process? , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  I. Delvendahl,et al.  Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation does not decrease the variability of motor-evoked potentials , 2010, Brain Stimulation.

[33]  G Gainotti,et al.  Motor cortex hyperexcitability to transcranial magnetic stimulation in Alzheimer’s disease , 2004, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[34]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Orchestrating neuronal networks: sustained after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation depend upon brain states , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[35]  Risto J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  EEG oscillations and magnetically evoked motor potentials reflect motor system excitability in overlapping neuronal populations , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[36]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Study and modulation of human cortical excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1998, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[37]  Alexander Thomas Sack,et al.  Interindividual Variability and Intraindividual Reliability of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation-induced Neuroplasticity Mechanisms in the Healthy Brain , 2017, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[39]  N. Weisz,et al.  Now I am ready-now i am not: The influence of pre-TMS oscillations and corticomuscular coherence on motor-evoked potentials. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks , 2004, Science.

[41]  Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur,et al.  Motor cortex dysfunction revealed by cortical excitability studies in Parkinson's disease: influence of antiparkinsonian treatment and cortical stimulation , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[42]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Post-movement beta synchronization. A correlate of an idling motor area? , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[43]  Emiliano Santarnecchi,et al.  State-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Oscillatory Currents on the Motor System: What You Think Matters , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  Christoph Braun,et al.  Mapping entrained brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) , 2016, NeuroImage.

[45]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[46]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Enhances Individual Alpha Activity in Human EEG , 2010, PloS one.

[47]  A. Antal,et al.  Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[48]  A. Antal,et al.  Comparing the Efficacy of Excitatory Transcranial Stimulation Methods Measuring Motor Evoked Potentials , 2014, Neural plasticity.

[49]  S. Tobimatsu,et al.  Phase and Frequency-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability , 2016, PloS one.

[50]  A. Antal,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[51]  William D. Penny,et al.  Causal evidence that intrinsic beta-frequency is relevant for enhanced signal propagation in the motor system as shown through rhythmic TMS , 2016, NeuroImage.

[52]  K. Chiappa,et al.  Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[53]  P. Brown,et al.  Driving Human Motor Cortical Oscillations Leads to Behaviorally Relevant Changes in Local GABAA Inhibition: A tACS-TMS Study , 2017, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[54]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Evidence for distinct beta resonance frequencies in human EEG related to specific sensorimotor cortical areas , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[55]  Robert Chen,et al.  Impairment of motor cortex activation and deactivation in Parkinson's disease , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[56]  Christoph Zrenner,et al.  Real-time EEG-defined excitability states determine efficacy of TMS-induced plasticity in human motor cortex , 2017, Brain Stimulation.