Seismic testing of steel braced frames with aluminum shear yielding dampers

Abstract A shake table study of single-bay two-storey model of conventional ordinary concentric braced frame (OCBF) and aluminum shear-link enabled braced frame (SLBF) was conducted to evaluate the performance of shear-link as energy dissipation device. The 1:12 reduced scale models were subjected to Taft ground motion of increasing peak ground accelerations, representing seismic loads of increasing severity. Similitude laws for adequate modeling of dynamic behavior of the reduced models were satisfied and time, frequency and acceleration values were scaled. The test indicated that SLBF frame attracted about 41–64% less base shear compared to OCBF for varying PGA levels of the ground motions. Similar trend was noticed for overturning moments and floor acceleration as well. However, the first storey floor drifts for the SLBF were always greater than the OCBF. Significant amount of energy was absorbed by aluminum shear-links leading to satisfactory response up to the scaled PGA of 1.7g of the Taft motion, while the OCBF frame could not survive the scaled PGA of 0.8g. These proof-of-concept tests also helped validate the design methodology developed for proportioning aluminum shear-link enabled steel frames.

[1]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the- practice , 2002 .

[2]  Mamoru Iwata,et al.  ENERGY DISSIPATION BEHAVIOUR OF SHEAR PANELS MADE OF LOW YIELD STEEL , 1994 .

[3]  Faris Albermani,et al.  Experimental study of steel slit damper for passive energy dissipation , 2008 .

[4]  Durgesh C. Rai,et al.  Development and performance of single-axis shake table for earthquake simulation , 2009 .

[5]  Francesco Benedettini,et al.  Buckling Experiments: Experimental Methods in Buckling of Thin–Walled Structures Vol. 1: Basic Concepts, Columns, Beams and Plates J. Singer, J. Arbocz and T. Weller John Wiley & Sons, Chichester , 1999 .

[6]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Seismic Testing of Steel Plate Energy Dissipation Devices , 1991 .

[7]  Durgesh C. Rai,et al.  ALUMINIUM SHEAR-LINKS FOR ENHANCED SEISMIC RESISTANCE , 1998 .

[8]  J. S. Hwang,et al.  Direct displacement-based design for building with passive energy dissipation systems , 2003 .

[9]  Durgesh C. Rai,et al.  Postyield Cyclic Buckling Criteria for Aluminum Shear Panels , 2008 .

[10]  G. De Matteis,et al.  Pure aluminium shear panels as dissipative devices in moment‐resisting steel frames , 2007 .

[11]  Theodore L. Karavasilis,et al.  Hysteretic model for steel energy dissipation devices and evaluation of a minimal-damage seismic design approach for steel buildings , 2012 .

[12]  Keh‐Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Design of Steel Triangular Plate Energy Absorbers for Seismic-Resistant Construction , 1993 .

[13]  Durgesh C. Rai,et al.  Seismic strengthening of non-ductile reinforced concrete frames using aluminum shear links as energy-dissipation devices , 2010 .

[14]  Durgesh C. Rai,et al.  A Novel Technique of Seismic Strengthening of Nonductile RC Frame using Steel Caging and Aluminum Shear Yielding Damper , 2009 .

[15]  R. S. Mills,et al.  Model tests on earthquake simulators: Development and implementation of experimental procedures , 1979 .

[16]  Mahmud Ashraf,et al.  Theoretical evaluation of yielding shear panel device for passive energy dissipation , 2009 .

[17]  Faris Albermani,et al.  Pinching hysteretic response of yielding shear panel device , 2011 .

[18]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering , 1997 .