Effects of walking environments on the objective and subjective gait measures during dynamic task performance

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the use of the center-of-gravity-based and center-of-pressure-based gait measures associated with loss of balance as well as the use of perceived sense of postural sway and instability (PSPSI) for the prediction of slip occurrence during dynamic task performance. The objective gait measures were determined by a multi-camera body motion analysis system and a strain gauge force platform. Twenty six trials performed by 21 subjects were collected for two walking environments in a laboratory-based experimental set-up. Two environments included the best (walking straight on a dry surface in good lighting) and the worst (walking straight on a slippery surface with a 2.3 Kg weight in the hand in poor lighting). Among the gait measures used in the study, it was found that the maximum distance between the center of pressure and the center of the base of support (OPmax) and the slide distance were the significant predictors of slip occurrence. An increase in the OPmax or slide distance indicates an increased likelihood of slip occurrence. The walking environment was found to have a significant effect on the PSPSI scale. It appears that the subjects were able to distinguish the difference in the walking environment but unable to perceive the potential hazards related to slips/falls during dynamic task performance. A comparison between the OPmax and slide distance (objective measures) and the PSPSI scale (subjective measure) can be used to predict a mismatch between the subjective perception of slip potential and the actual risk of slipping during task performance on a slippery surface.

[1]  Amit Bhattacharya,et al.  Kinematic Methods for Quantifying Loss of Balance While Negotiating a Curved Path on a Slippery Surface , 1997 .

[2]  Lennart Strandberg,et al.  The dynamics of slipping accidents , 1981 .

[3]  John Miller Cooper,et al.  The biomechanics of human movement , 1989 .

[4]  B. Benda,et al.  Biomechanical relationship between center of gravity and center of pressure during standing , 1994 .

[5]  Craig Jones,et al.  The incidence of underfoot accidents during 1985 in a working population of 10,000 Merseyside people , 1988 .

[6]  R E Schlegel,et al.  Coefficient of Friction and Subjective Assessment of Slippery Work Surfaces , 1992, Human factors.

[7]  A. Bhattacharya,et al.  Non-invasive estimation of afferent inputs for postural stability under low levels of alcohol , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Christopher L. Vaughan,et al.  Dynamics of human gait , 1992 .

[9]  T. Shimba.  An estimation of center of gravity from force platform data. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Joseph Mizrahi,et al.  An iterative model for estimation of the trajectory of center of gravity from bilateral reactive force measurements in standing sway , 1996 .

[11]  R. Brand,et al.  The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological , 1992 .

[12]  R. Shiavi,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of body center of pressure and center of gravity during upright stance. Part I: Methods , 1996 .

[13]  A. J. Barr,et al.  SAS user's guide , 1979 .

[14]  Marjorie H. Woollacott,et al.  Motor Control: Theory and Practical Applications , 1995 .

[15]  David A. Winter,et al.  Sagittal Plane Balance and Posture in Human Walking , 1987, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[16]  Amit Bhattacharya,et al.  Effects of environmental and task risk factors on workers' perceived sense of postural sway and instability , 1998 .

[17]  R. Shiavi,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of body center of pressure and center of gravity during upright stance. Part II: Amplitude and frequency data , 1996 .