Supply Chain Cooperation by Agreed Reduction of Behavior Variability: A Simulation-based Study

Supply chain echelons normally base their operational decisions on average values of the parameters that depend on other members. However, in real-life operation the variability of said parameters decreases the link profits. Thus, a cooperative arrangement may be devised in which a link agrees to reduce the variability of its behavior to enhance the performance of other links, receiving compensation in return. This work shows the application of simulation and decision trees to assess the feasibility of this cooperation scheme, from the perspective of the central link of a three member supply chain. First, the operational parameters of the link are optimized for mean values of the variables set by adjacent members. Then, by simulating the system for different probability distributions of these variables, graphs of the expected link gain versus the variances of the distributions are plotted. The results are incorporated to decision trees to evaluate the collaboration feasibility. It was found that the increased variability of the behavior of one neighboring member decreases the benefit of lowering the variability of the behavior of the other. The manuscript closes with a discussion of the practical viability of this collaboration scheme.

[1]  Jose M. Framiñan,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics On the Bullwhip Avoidance Phase : The Synchronised Supply Chain , 2012 .

[2]  Ruoning Xu,et al.  Optimal models for single-period supply chain problems with fuzzy demand , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[3]  Christoph H. Glock,et al.  A joint economic lot size model with financial collaboration and uncertain investment opportunity , 2016 .

[4]  Christopher Durugbo,et al.  Network-oriented Uncertainty Evaluation of Industrial Product-service Collaborative Readiness , 2014 .

[5]  Bin Dan,et al.  Coordinating a dual-channel supply chain with risk-averse under a two-way revenue sharing contract , 2014 .

[6]  Mingming Leng,et al.  Side-payment contracts in two-person nonzero-sum supply chain games: Review, discussion and applications , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Mikhael Shor,et al.  How collaborative forecasting can reduce forecast accuracy , 2015, Oper. Res. Lett..

[8]  Tao Wang,et al.  Decision analysis of retailer-dominated dual-channel supply chain considering cost misreporting , 2016 .

[9]  B. K. Ghosh,et al.  Simulation Using Promodel , 2000 .

[10]  Kun Chang Lee,et al.  MACE-SCM: A multi-agent and case-based reasoning collaboration mechanism for supply chain management under supply and demand uncertainties , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Bernard Grabot,et al.  A decision support tool for procurement planning process under uncertainty , 2011 .

[12]  U. Ramanathan Aligning supply chain collaboration using Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2013 .

[13]  Jun-Yeon Lee,et al.  Vendor-managed inventory in a global environment with exchange rate uncertainty , 2011 .

[14]  Roberto Cigolini,et al.  Linking supply chain configuration to supply chain perfrmance: A discrete event simulation model , 2014, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[15]  Stephen M. Disney,et al.  The impact of information enrichment on the Bullwhip effect in supply chains: A control engineering perspective , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Jian Jhen Chen,et al.  Coordination of information sharing in a supply chain , 2013 .

[17]  Liu Fang,et al.  Application of Modified Shapley Value in Gains Allocation of Closed-loop Supply Chain under Third-Party Reclaim , 2011 .

[18]  Yingshuai Zhao,et al.  On Human Decision Behavior in Multi-Echelon Inventory Management , 2011 .

[19]  Jian Li,et al.  Will a supplier benefit from sharing good information with a retailer? , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[20]  Chandrasekharan Rajendran,et al.  The value of information sharing in a serial supply chain with AR(1) demand and non-zero replenishment lead times , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Zhiyong Yang,et al.  The effect of uncertainty avoidance and social trust on supply chain collaboration , 2015 .

[22]  S. Disney,et al.  On variance amplification in a three-echelon supply chain with minimum mean square error forecasting , 2022 .

[23]  Srinagesh Gavirneni,et al.  Benefits of co-operation in a production distribution environment , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Stephen M. Disney,et al.  The impact of information sharing, random yield, correlation, and lead times in closed loop supply chains , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Jalal Ashayeri,et al.  Dynamic simulation assessment of collaboration strategies to manage demand gap in high-tech product diffusion , 2010 .

[26]  Zhimin Huang,et al.  Co-op advertising models in manufacturer-retailer supply chains: A game theory approach , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Yanfeng Ouyang,et al.  The bullwhip effect in supply chain networks , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Baoguang Xu,et al.  Supply chain coordination with insurance contract , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics Modeling synergies in multi-criteria supplier selection and order allocation : An application to commodity trading , 2016 .

[30]  Amy Hing-Ling Lau,et al.  How a retailer should manipulate a dominant manufacturer's perception of market and cost parameters , 2008 .

[31]  Yanfeng Ouyang,et al.  The effect of information sharing on supply chain stability and the bullwhip effect , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  Alain Bensoussan,et al.  Optimizing production and inventory decisions in a supply chain with lot size, production rate and lead time interactions , 2013, Appl. Math. Comput..

[33]  Young Hae Lee,et al.  The value of information sharing in a supply chain with seasonal demand process , 2010, The 40th International Conference on Computers & Indutrial Engineering.

[34]  Alain Yee-Loong Chong,et al.  Green Supply Chain Collaboration implementation in China: The mediating role of guanxi , 2014 .

[35]  Terry P. Harrison,et al.  Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a supply chain with stochastic lead time , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  Hamid Noori,et al.  Strategizing niceness in co-opetition: The case of knowledge exchange in supply chain innovation projects , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  Ohbyung Kwon,et al.  An agent-based web service approach for supply chain collaboration , 2011 .

[38]  Dean C. Chatfield,et al.  Returns and the bullwhip effect , 2013 .

[39]  Sameer Kumar,et al.  Assessing effect of global inventory planning with enterprise-wide information for a large manufacturer , 2015 .

[40]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Decision support with ill-known criteria in the collaborative supply chain context , 2014, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[41]  Francesco Costantino,et al.  The impact of information sharing on ordering policies to improve supply chain performances , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[42]  Bernard Grabot,et al.  Management of the risk of backorders in a MTO-ATO / MTS context under imperfect requirements , 2013 .

[43]  Don Jyh-Fu Jeng,et al.  Generating a causal model of supply chain collaboration using the fuzzy DEMATEL technique , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[44]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  The incremental bullwhip effect of operational deviations in an arborescent supply chain with requirements planning , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  Xiaohang Yue,et al.  Role of forecast effort on supply chain profitability under various information sharing scenarios , 2011 .

[46]  A. Villa,et al.  UNCERTAIN DEMAND & SUPPLY NETWORKS MANAGEMENT: APPLICATION TO A REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICE , 2005 .

[47]  Ying Wei,et al.  Mean-variance analysis of supply chains under wholesale pricing and profit sharing schemes , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..