Validation of Van Aerde's simplified steadystate car-following and traffic stream model

Abstract The research reported in this paper validates Van Aerde's simplified steady-state car-following and traffic stream motion model, identifies valid input parameter ranges, and compares the model performance to other single and multi-regime models. In addition, the paper demonstrates that the Pipes linear car-following model produces the commonly known inverted V-shaped flow-density relationship. The paper also derives the relationship between the kinematic wave speed and the facility capacity, jam density, and free-flow speed for the Pipes and Van Aerde models. The study demonstrates that the Van Aerde functional form offers a superior fit to field data when compared to Newell's nonlinear single-regime model and Pipes linear dual-regime model. Specifically, the Van Aerde model is shown to fit data from different roadway types using different data aggregation intervals with a quality of fit that is superior to multi-regime models, without the need to deal with the complexities associated with the selection of regime break points.

[1]  Sam Yagar,et al.  DYNAMIC INTEGRATED FREEWAY/TRAFFIC SIGNAL NETWORKS: PROBLEMS AND PROPOSED SOLUTIONS , 1988 .

[2]  H. Greenberg An Analysis of Traffic Flow , 1959 .

[3]  Francois Dion,et al.  Vehicle Dynamics Model for Estimating Maximum Light-Duty Vehicle Acceleration Levels , 2004 .

[4]  B D Greenshields,et al.  A study of traffic capacity , 1935 .

[5]  Hesham Rakha,et al.  VARIABLE POWER VEHICLE DYNAMICS MODEL FOR ESTIMATING TRUCK ACCELERATIONS , 2002 .

[6]  M Van Aerde MODELLING OF TRAFFIC FLOWS, ASSIGNMENT AND QUEUEING IN INTEGRATED FREEWAY/ TRAFFIC SIGNAL NETWORKS , 1985 .

[7]  Hesham Rakha,et al.  Tool for Calibrating Steady-State Traffic Stream and Car-Following Models , 2007 .

[8]  Hesham Rakha,et al.  INTEGRATION MODELING FRAMEWORK FOR ESTIMATING MOBILE SOURCE EMISSIONS , 2004 .

[9]  Hesham A Rakha,et al.  Multivariate calibration of single regime speed-flow-density relationships [road traffic management] , 1995, Pacific Rim TransTech Conference. 1995 Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference Proceedings. 6th International VNIS. A Ride into the Future.

[10]  Sam Yagar,et al.  Dynamic integrated freeway/traffic signal networks: A routing-based modelling approach , 1988 .

[11]  Taewan Kim,et al.  Gap time and stochastic wave propagation , 2004, Proceedings. The 7th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8749).

[12]  Adolf D. May,et al.  Traffic Flow Fundamentals , 1989 .

[13]  P. I. Richards Shock Waves on the Highway , 1956 .

[14]  L. Chambers Linear and Nonlinear Waves , 2000, The Mathematical Gazette.

[15]  L. A. Pipes An Operational Analysis of Traffic Dynamics , 1953 .

[16]  James H Banks FREEWAY SPEED-FLOW-CONCENTRATION RELATIONSHIPS: MORE EVIDENCE AND INTERPRETATIONS (WITH DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE) , 1989 .

[17]  M. Lighthill,et al.  On kinematic waves I. Flood movement in long rivers , 1955, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[18]  Hesham A Rakha,et al.  Vehicle dynamics model for predicting maximum truck acceleration levels , 2001 .

[19]  M. Lighthill,et al.  On kinematic waves I. Flood movement in long rivers , 1955, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[20]  Louis A. Pipes,et al.  Car following models and the fundamental diagram of road traffic , 1967 .

[21]  Hesham Rakha,et al.  Comparison of Greenshields, Pipes, and Van Aerde Car-Following and Traffic Stream Models , 2002 .

[22]  G. F. Newell Nonlinear Effects in the Dynamics of Car Following , 1961 .

[23]  J. M. D. Castillo,et al.  On the functional form of the speed-density relationship—I: General theory , 1995 .