A diary study on location autonomy and employee mental distress: the mediating role of task-environment fit

PurposeThis study aims to examine the role of location autonomy (i.e. autonomy over where to work) in shaping employee mental distress during their working days.Design/methodology/approachA total of 316 employees from 6 organizations in the UK provided data for 4,082 half-day sessions, over 10 working days. Random intercept modeling is used to analyze half-day data nested within individuals.FindingsResults show that location autonomy, beyond decision-making autonomy and work-method autonomy, is positively associated with the perception of task-environment (TE) fit which, in turn, contributes to lower mental distress during each half-day session. Results of supplementary analysis also show that location autonomy can contribute to higher absorption, task proficiency and job satisfaction via TE fit during each half-day session.Originality/valueThis study reveals the importance and uniqueness of location autonomy in shaping employees' outcomes, offering implications for how organizations can use this in the work–life flexibility policies to support employee mental health.

[1]  Brenda A. Lautsch,et al.  Work-Life Flexibility Policies From a Boundary Control and Implementation Perspective: A Review and Research Framework , 2022, Journal of Management.

[2]  Gisela Bäcklander,et al.  Relationships of Task–Environment Fit With Office Workers’ Concentration and Team Functioning in Activity-Based Working Environments , 2022, Environment and Behavior.

[3]  Karen B. Kent,et al.  Organizational Best Practices Supporting Mental Health in the Workplace , 2021, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[4]  Kai-Ingo Voigt,et al.  Understanding the Mechanisms of Activity-based Workspaces: A Case Study , 2021, Environment and Behavior.

[5]  M. Tomprou,et al.  Workspace transitions: conceptualizing and measuring person–space fit and examining its role in workplace outcomes and social network activity , 2020 .

[6]  Malgorzata W. Kozusznik,et al.  Employees’ Work Patterns–Office Type Fit and the Dynamic Relationship Between Flow and Performance , 2020 .

[7]  Jan Gerard Hoendervanger,et al.  Perceived fit in activity-based work environments and its impact on satisfaction and performance , 2019, Journal of Environmental Psychology.

[8]  A. Reizer,et al.  Employee motivation, emotions, and performance: a longitudinal diary study , 2019, Journal of Managerial Psychology.

[9]  Marisa Salanova,et al.  An Ultra-Short Measure for Work Engagement , 2019, European Journal of Psychological Assessment.

[10]  T. Schmader,et al.  Seeking authenticity in diverse contexts: How identities and environments constrain “free” choice , 2019, Social and Personality Psychology Compass.

[11]  A. Bakker,et al.  Fostering Flexibility in the New World of Work: A Model of Time-Spatial Job Crafting , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[12]  Guido Hertel,et al.  The Relation Between Activity-Based Work Environments and Office Workers’ Job Attitudes and Vitality , 2019 .

[13]  J. Peiró,et al.  The Role of Employees’ Work Patterns and Office Type Fit (and Misfit) in the Relationships Between Employee Well-Being and Performance , 2018, Environment and Behavior.

[14]  Christian Korunka,et al.  Need–Supply Fit in an Activity-Based Flexible Office: A Longitudinal Study During Relocation , 2018 .

[15]  April J. Spivack,et al.  Perceived Location Autonomy and Work Environment Choice: The Mediating Influence of Intrinsic Motivation , 2018 .

[16]  A. V. Vianen Person–Environment Fit: A Review of Its Basic Tenets , 2018 .

[17]  A. Kristof-brown,et al.  Resolution, Relief, and Resignation: A Qualitative Study of Responses to Misfit at Work , 2017 .

[18]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Choosing where to work at work – towards a theoretical model of benefits and risks of activity-based flexible offices , 2017, Ergonomics.

[19]  P. Cuijpers,et al.  Scaling-up treatment of depression and anxiety: a global return on investment analysis. , 2016, The lancet. Psychiatry.

[20]  Casper J. Albers,et al.  Flexibility in use: Switching behaviour and satisfaction in activity-based work environments , 2016 .

[21]  A. Bakker,et al.  Examining Job Crafting from an Interpersonal Perspective: Is Employee Job Crafting Related to the Well‐Being of Colleagues? , 2015 .

[22]  Tammy D Allen,et al.  How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings , 2015, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[23]  Laurenz L. Meier,et al.  The effect of conflict at work on well-being: Depressive symptoms as a vulnerability factor , 2014 .

[24]  H.A.J.A. Appel Meulenbroek,et al.  An end user’s perspective on activity-based office concepts , 2011 .

[25]  David P MacKinnon,et al.  RMediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[26]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  The Physical Environment of the Office: Contemporary and Emerging Issues , 2011 .

[27]  Corine Boon,et al.  The relationship between perceptions of HR practices and employee outcomes: examining the role of person–organisation and person–job fit , 2011 .

[28]  I. Inceoglu,et al.  A Comprehensive Framework for Understanding and Predicting Engagement , 2010 .

[29]  A. Bakker,et al.  Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology , 2008, Bioscience trends.

[30]  Stephen E. Humphrey,et al.  Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  S. Parker,et al.  A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts , 2007 .

[32]  Stephen E. Humphrey,et al.  The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  Samuel M. Demarie,et al.  Aligning strategic human resource management and person–environment fit , 2005 .

[34]  A. Maher,et al.  Individual differences in employee reactions to open-plan offices , 2005 .

[35]  A. Kristof-brown,et al.  CONSEQUENCES OF INDIVIDUALS' FIT AT WORK: A META-ANALYSIS OF PERSON-JOB, PERSON-ORGANIZATION, PERSON-GROUP, AND PERSON-SUPERVISOR FIT , 2005 .

[36]  K. R. Milner,et al.  A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[37]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[38]  Aaron C. Kay,et al.  Sour Grapes, Sweet Lemons, and the Anticipatory Rationalization of the Status Quo , 2002 .

[39]  Nancy B. Kurland,et al.  A review of telework research: findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work , 2002 .

[40]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  All in a Day'S Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions , 2000 .

[41]  T. Judge,et al.  Interviewers' perceptions of persons-organization fit and organizational selection decisions. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[42]  S. Parker,et al.  The demands—control model of job strain: A more specific test , 1996 .

[43]  Amy L. Kristof PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF ITS CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND IMPLICATIONS , 1996 .

[44]  C. Cooper,et al.  The person-environment fit approach to stress: Recurring problems and some suggested solutions , 1990 .

[45]  R. Caplan Person-environment fit theory and organizations: Commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms , 1987 .

[46]  A. Furnham,et al.  Person-environment fit, job satisfaction and mental health , 1984 .

[47]  Robert Karasek,et al.  Job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign , 1979 .

[48]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Job satisfaction. , 1969, Hospital administration currents.

[49]  F. Cooke,et al.  Well-being-oriented human resource management practices and employee performance in the Chinese banking sector: the role of social climate and resilience , 2019 .

[50]  D. Guest Human resource management and employee well-being: towards a new analytic framework , 2017 .