Connected component based ROI selection to improve identification of microcalcification from mammogram images

In this paper, we propose automated image processing method for mammogram image analysis to enhance the classification of malignant and benign clustered micro calcifications. Mini-Mias, one of the most renowned mammogram dataset, is used for our experiment. Region of interest (ROI) is selected using connected component labeling method. Shape and textural features are computed and used in five different classifiers to validate the correctness of labeling method usage for this specific research. Experimental results show that Random Forest and Bagging classifier can produce best classification accuracy among them. We used Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to asses and differentiate the classification performance from different methods. Random Forest and Bagging, both classifiers provide more than 99% accuracy.

[1]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[2]  David J. Marchette,et al.  The detection of micro-calcifications in mammographic images using high dimensional features , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS).

[3]  Ian W. Ricketts,et al.  The Mammographic Image Analysis Society digital mammogram database , 1994 .

[4]  J. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Medical image processing and analysis , 2000 .

[5]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis of breast lesions in medical images , 2000, Comput. Sci. Eng..

[6]  Chih-Ming Chen,et al.  An efficient fuzzy classifier with feature selection based on fuzzy entropy , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[7]  Michael Y. Hu,et al.  Estimating breast cancer risks using neural networks , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[8]  Yuan Yuan,et al.  Using Bagging classifier to predict protein domain structural class. , 2006, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[9]  R. Warren,et al.  Initial experiences of using an automated volumetric measure of breast density: the standard mammogram form. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  Václav Snásel,et al.  Breast Cancer Detection and Classification Using Support Vector Machines and Pulse Coupled Neural Network , 2011, IHCI.

[11]  Young Jae Kim,et al.  Body Fat Assessment Method Using CT Images with Separation Mask Algorithm , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[12]  Jeon-Hor Chen,et al.  Diagnosis of Solid Breast Tumors Using Vessel Analysis in Three-Dimensional Power Doppler Ultrasound Images , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[13]  Javad Haddadnia,et al.  Diagnosis of Breast Cancer using a Combination of Genetic Algorithm and Artificial Neural Network in Medical Infrared Thermal Imaging , 2012 .

[14]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  An Algorithm for Connected-Component Labeling, Hole Labeling and Euler Number Computing , 2013, Journal of Computer Science and Technology.

[15]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Random forest-based similarity measures for multi-modal classification of Alzheimer's disease , 2013, NeuroImage.

[16]  Irma H. Russo,et al.  Methodological Approach to Tissue Microarray for Studying the Normal and Cancerous Human Breast , 2014 .

[17]  อนิรุธ สืบสิงห์,et al.  Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques , 2014 .

[18]  Dorthe Wildenschild,et al.  Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X‐ray microtomography: A review , 2014 .

[19]  Baohua Zhang,et al.  The study and application of the improved region growing algorithm for liver segmentation , 2014 .