Medicare advantage plans at a crossroads--yet again.

Since risk-taking, private health insurance plans were introduced into Medicare twenty-five years ago, policymakers have disagreed on these plans' fundamental purposes. Articulated objectives, which include improving quality, reducing government spending, providing additional benefits (without expanding the entitlement), increasing choices for beneficiaries, and providing benchmark competition for traditional Medicare, are plausible but sometimes conflicting. The program's history demonstrates continuous shifts in emphasis on these objectives. We enumerate the differing advantages of public and private plans in Medicare and argue that policymakers should focus their efforts on leveling the public-private playing field, thereby dealing forthrightly with the reality of growing fiscal problems.

[1]  G. Greenberg Medicare Prospective Payment and the Shaping of U.S. Health Care , 2007 .

[2]  B. Dowd,et al.  Fee-for-Service Medicare in a Competitive Market Environment , 2005, Health care financing review.

[3]  R. Berenson Medicare disadvantaged and the search for the elusive 'level playing field'. , 2004, Health affairs.

[4]  R. Berenson,et al.  Are market forces strong enough to deliver efficient health care systems? Confidence is waning. , 2004, Health affairs.

[5]  R. Berenson Getting serious about excessive Medicare spending: a purchasing model. , 2003, Health affairs.

[6]  Alain C Enthoven,et al.  Paying for performance: Medicare should lead. , 2003, Health affairs.

[7]  David Wennberg,et al.  The Implications of Regional Variations in Medicare Spending. Part 2: Health Outcomes and Satisfaction with Care , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  K. Thorpe,et al.  Medicare+Choice: current role and near-term prospects. , 2002, Health affairs.

[9]  Harold S Luft,et al.  HMO plan performance update: an analysis of the literature, 1997-2001. , 2002, Health affairs.

[10]  C. Bocchino,et al.  Disease management practices of health plans. , 2002, The American journal of managed care.

[11]  B. Dowd,et al.  A tale of four cities: Medicare reform and competitive pricing. , 2000, Health affairs.

[12]  K. Ignagni Putting principles first: a better way to carry out a demonstration. , 2000, Health affairs.

[13]  L. Baker,et al.  Association of managed care market share and health expenditures for fee-for-service Medicare patients. , 1999, JAMA.

[14]  T. McBride,et al.  Disparities in access to Medicare managed care plans and their benefits. , 1998, Health affairs.

[15]  S. Christensen Medicare+Choice provisions in the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. , 1998, Health affairs.

[16]  R H Miller,et al.  Does managed care lead to better or worse quality of care? , 1997, Health affairs.

[17]  V. Fuchs The "competition revolution" in health care. , 1988, Health affairs.

[18]  B. Dowd,et al.  Setting Physicians' Prices in FFS Medicare: An Economic Perspective , 2006, Health care financing review.

[19]  R. Berenson,et al.  The Future of Private Plan Contracting in Medicare , 2002 .

[20]  B. Dowd More on Medicare competitive pricing. , 2001, Health affairs.

[21]  B. Vladeċk,et al.  Bringing competitive pricing to Medicare. , 2000, Health affairs.

[22]  S. Retchin,et al.  Do Health Maintenance Organizations Work for Medicare? , 1993, Health care financing review.