Design Optimization of a Time-Of-Flight, Breast PET Scanner

A dedicated breast positron emission tomography (PET) scanner with limited angle geometry can provide flexibility in detector placement around the patient as well as the ability to combine it with other imaging modalities. A primary challenge of a stationary limited angle scanner is the reduced image quality due to artifacts present in the reconstructed image leading to a loss in quantitative information. Previously, it has been shown that using time-of-flight (TOF) information in image reconstruction can help reduce these image artifacts arising due to missing angular projections. Our goal in this work is to optimize the TOF, breast scanner design by performing studies for estimating image uniformity and lesion activity uptake as a function of system timing resolution, scanner angular coverage and shape. Our results show that (i) 1.5 × 1.5 × 15 mm3 lutetium oxy-orthosilicate (LSO) crystals provide a high spatial resolution and system sensitivity relative to clinical scanners, (ii) 2/3 angular coverage scanner design with TOF timing resolution less than 600 ps is appropriate for providing a tomographic image with fewer artifacts and good lesion uptake estimation relative to other partial ring designs studied in this work, (iii) a flat scanner design with 2/3 angular coverage is affected more by larger parallax error than a curved scanner geometry with the same angular coverage, but provides more uniform lesion contrast estimate over the imaging field-of-view (FOV), (iv) 2/3 angular coverage, flat, 300 ps TOF scanner design (for short, practical scan times of ≤ 5 min per breast) provides similar precision of contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) values to a full curved, non-TOF scanner, and (v) employing depth-of-interaction (DOI) measuring detector and/or implementing resolution modeling (RM) in image reconstruction lead to improved and more uniform spatial resolution and lesion contrast over the whole FOV.

[1]  C Lartizien,et al.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  João Paulo Teixeira,et al.  Design and evaluation of the clear-PEM scanner for positron emission mammography , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[3]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Mutatis Mutandis: Harmonize the Standard! , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  R L Wahl,et al.  Standardized uptake values of normal tissues at PET with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: variations with body weight and a method for correction. , 1993, Radiology.

[5]  M. Iima,et al.  Clinical Performance of 2 Dedicated PET Scanners for Breast Imaging: Initial Evaluation , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  Simon R. Cherry,et al.  Initial Characterization of a Dedicated Breast PET/CT Scanner During Human Imaging , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  Paul E Kinahan,et al.  The positron emission mammography/tomography breast imaging and biopsy system (PEM/PET): design, construction and phantom-based measurements , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Samuel Matej,et al.  3D-FRP: direct Fourier reconstruction with Fourier reprojection for fully 3-D PET , 2000 .

[9]  J. Karp,et al.  Design considerations for a limited angle, dedicated breast, TOF PET scanner , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[10]  S. Matej,et al.  Iterative image reconstruction using geometrically ordered subsets with list-mode data , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[11]  A. Vandenbroucke,et al.  Performance characterization of a new high resolution PET scintillation detector , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[13]  F. Sánchez,et al.  Design and evaluation of the MAMMI dedicated breast PET. , 2012, Medical physics.

[14]  L.M. Popescu,et al.  Ray tracing through a grid of blobs , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..