Analysis of the rigid and deformable component of setup inaccuracies on portal images in head and neck radiotherapy

The issue of setup errors consisting of translation, rotation and deformation components in head and neck radiotherapy is addressed with a piecewise registration of small independent regions on a portal image to their reference position. These rectangular regions are termed featurelets as they contain relevant anatomical features. The resulting displacement vectors of each featurelet reflect both the center-of-mass (COM), i.e. the rigid, and the non-rigid component of the setup error. The displacement vectors of a series of daily portal images were subjected to a principal component analysis. In addition to the mean, systematic displacement of each featurelet, this analysis yields correlated patterns of anatomical deformations. Hence, the physiological movements of an individual patient can be obtained without a biomechanical model. It is shown that in the presence of setup errors that are due to rotations or deformations a correction by the COM displacement may deteriorate the error of parts of the anatomy further. The featurelet analysis can be used to refine setup correction protocols, tune spatially variable setup margins in treatment planning and optimize patient immobilization devices.

[1]  Karl-Axel Johansson,et al.  Systematic set-up errors for IMRT in the head and neck region: effect on dose distribution. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  Prakash Chinnaiyan,et al.  The impact of daily setup variations on head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Pantelis Karaiskos,et al.  Registration of electronic portal images for patient set-up verification. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[5]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  M. Alber,et al.  Modelling individual geometric variation based on dominant eigenmodes of organ deformation: implementation and evaluation , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Serge Miguet,et al.  Patient setup error measurement using 3D intensity-based image registration techniques. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  J Kim,et al.  A feasibility study of mutual information based setup error estimation for radiotherapy. , 2001, Medical physics.

[9]  B G Fallone,et al.  3D interfractional patient position verification using 2D-3D registration of orthogonal images. , 2006, Medical physics.

[10]  D Verellen,et al.  Electronic portal imaging with on-line correction of setup error in thoracic irradiation: clinical evaluation. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Multiple regions-of-interest analysis of setup uncertainties for head-and-neck cancer radiotherapy. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  P. Remeijer,et al.  Set-up verification using portal imaging; review of current clinical practice. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  M van Herk,et al.  3-D portal image analysis in clinical practice: an evaluation of 2-D and 3-D analysis techniques as applied to 30 prostate cancer patients. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Mark Jobse,et al.  A new algorithm for the registration of portal images to planning images in the verification of radiotherapy, as validated in prostate treatments. , 2003, Medical physics.

[15]  Lech Papiez,et al.  On probabilistically defined margins in radiation therapy , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  A Bel,et al.  High-precision prostate cancer irradiation by clinical application of an offline patient setup verification procedure, using portal imaging. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  M van Herk,et al.  Automatic three-dimensional inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using portal images, simulator images, and computed tomography data. , 1996, Medical physics.

[18]  L Dong,et al.  A portal image alignment and patient setup verification procedure using moments and correlation techniques. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  Evaluation of cost functions for gray value matching of two-dimensional images in radiotherapy. , 2003, Medical physics.

[20]  J Moseley,et al.  A semiautomatic method for registration of portal images. , 1994, Medical physics.