How Knowledge Workers Gather Information from the Web: Implications for Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Tools

The success of peer-to-peer (p2p) music sharing has no doubt contributed to assumptions that individuals’ PCs are a vast untapped resource of assets just waiting to be unlocked by such systems. This includes the push for opening up our file spaces at work to allow peers access to previously inaccessible information with minimum effort. We wished to explore the potential value of these ideas and to test some of the assumptions underlying them, the motivation being that we believed the issues raised by this investigation would be important to those developing p2p information sharing tools. We do this by looking at the flow of information in and out of 16 knowledge workers’ file spaces in the context of carrying out Web information gathering tasks at work. In doing this we find that the file spaces used for knowledge work are more like ‘workbenches’ than ‘archives’ and that the information held within them is fundamentally different in content and organization to that which knowledge workers place in shared information spaces such as the Web. Knowledge workers work on their information to make it shareable to specific audiences yet this information is found side by side on the ‘workbench’ with unshareable information. This leads us to question the potential value of enabling people to open up their file spaces without having regard to the reusability of this information for others.

[1]  Christoph Hölscher,et al.  Searching on the Web: Two Types of Expertise (poster abstract). , 1999, SIGIR 1999.

[2]  M. Bonifacio,et al.  Enabling Distributed Knowledge Management: Managerial and Technological Implications , 2002 .

[3]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface , 1989 .

[4]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Footprints: history-rich tools for information foraging , 1999, CHI '99.

[5]  Hideaki Takeda,et al.  Discovery of Shared Topics Networks among People - A Simple Approach to Find Community Knowledge from WWW Bookmarks , 2000, PRICAI.

[6]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Grassroots: A System Providing a Uniform Framework for Communicating, Structuring, Sharing Information, and Organizing People , 1996, Comput. Networks.

[7]  Robin Jeffries,et al.  Where did you put it? Issues in the design and use of a group memory , 1993, INTERCHI.

[8]  Atsushi Kanai,et al.  Hyperclip : a Tool for Gathering and Sharing Meta-Data on Users ’ Activities by using Peer-to-Peer Technology , 2002 .

[9]  Ian T. Foster,et al.  Locating Data in (Small-World?) Peer-to-Peer Scientific Collaborations , 2002, IPTPS.

[10]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward A Theory of Knowledge Reuse : Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success , 2022 .

[11]  John Kubiatowicz,et al.  Extracting guarantees from chaos , 2003, CACM.

[12]  Jodi Aronson A Pragmatic View of Thematic Analysis , 1995 .

[13]  Rushed Kanawati,et al.  Informing the Design of Shared Bookmark Systems , 2000, RIAO.

[14]  Richard Harper Inside the IMF , 1997 .

[15]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  How knowledge workers use the web , 2002, CHI.

[16]  Alison Kidd,et al.  The marks are on the knowledge worker , 1994, CHI '94.

[17]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  Constructing Common Information Spaces , 1997, ECSCW.

[18]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  Information foraging in information access environments , 1995, CHI '95.

[19]  Christoph Hölscher,et al.  Searching on the Web (poster abstract): two types of expertise , 1999, SIGIR '99.

[20]  Andreas Paepcke,et al.  Information needs in technical work settings and their implications for the design of computer tools , 1996, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[21]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Keeping found things found on the web , 2001, CIKM '01.

[22]  R. Harper,et al.  Inside the IMF: An Ethnography of Documents, Technology, and Organizational Action , 1997 .

[23]  Ian Dickinson,et al.  The ePerson snippet manager: a semantic web application.Vol. 328. , 2002 .

[24]  Kristine Turner Information seeking retrieval, reading and storing behaviour of library users , 1997 .