Role of Cytoskeletal Tension in the Induction of Cardiomyogenic Differentiation in Micropatterned Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell

The role of biophysical induction methods such as cell micropatterning in stem cell differentiation has been well documented previously. However, the underlying mechanistic linkage of the engineered cell shape to directed lineage commitment remains poorly understood. Here, it is reported that micropatterning plays an important role in regulating the optimal cytoskeletal tension development in human mesenchymal stem cell (hMSC) via cell mechanotransduction pathways to induce cardiomyogenic differentiation. Cells are grown on fibronectin strip patterns to control cell polarization and morphology. These patterned cells eventually show directed commitment toward the myocardial lineage. The cell's mechanical properties (cell stiffness and cell traction forces) are observed to be very different for cells that have committed to the myocardial lineage when compared with that of control. These committed cells have mechanical properties that are significantly lower indicating a correlation between the micropatterning-induced differentiation and actomyosin-generated cytoskeletal tension within patterned cells. To study this correlation, patterned cells are treated with RhoA pathway inhibitor. Severely down-regulated cardiomyogenic marker expression is observed in those treated patterned cells, thus emphasizing the direct dependence of hMSCs differentiation fate on the cytoskeletal tension.

[1]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[2]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Force-dependent cell signaling in stem cell differentiation , 2012, Stem Cell Research & Therapy.

[3]  M. Dembo,et al.  Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[4]  G. Gabbiani,et al.  Focal adhesion features during myofibroblastic differentiation are controlled by intracellular and extracellular factors. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[5]  G. Meacci,et al.  Cells test substrate rigidity by local contractions on submicrometer pillars , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Ning Wang,et al.  Traction in smooth muscle cells varies with cell spreading. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Lay Poh Tan,et al.  Micro-/nano-engineered cellular responses for soft tissue engineering and biomedical applications. , 2011, Small.

[8]  Ravi A. Desai,et al.  Activation of beta 1 but not beta 3 integrin increases cell traction forces , 2013, FEBS letters.

[9]  L. P. Tan,et al.  Mechanoregulation of stem cell fate via micro-/nano-scale manipulation for regenerative medicine. , 2013, Nanomedicine.

[10]  K. Beningo,et al.  Nascent Focal Adhesions Are Responsible for the Generation of Strong Propulsive Forces in Migrating Fibroblasts , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[11]  J. Dang,et al.  Myogenic Induction of Aligned Mesenchymal Stem Cell Sheets by Culture on Thermally Responsive Electrospun Nanofibers , 2007, Advanced materials.

[12]  F. Wen,et al.  Direct laser machining-induced topographic pattern promotes up-regulation of myogenic markers in human mesenchymal stem cells. , 2012, Acta biomaterialia.

[13]  Shaobing Zhou,et al.  The Control of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation Using Dynamically Tunable Surface Microgrooves , 2014, Advanced healthcare materials.

[14]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[15]  Elliot L Elson,et al.  Mechanics of cell spreading: role of myosin II , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[16]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors Externally Applied Local Mechanical Force Induces Growth of Focal Contacts by an Mdia1-Dependent and Rock-Independent Mechanism , 2001 .

[17]  F. Wen,et al.  A Bio‐inspired Platform to Modulate Myogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Through Focal Adhesion Regulation , 2013, Advanced healthcare materials.

[18]  Lay Poh Tan,et al.  Nanoparticles strengthen intracellular tension and retard cellular migration. , 2014, Nano letters.

[19]  J. Alcaraz,et al.  Micropatterning of single endothelial cell shape reveals a tight coupling between nuclear volume in G1 and proliferation. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[20]  F. Wen,et al.  Insights into the role of focal adhesion modulation in myogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. , 2013, Stem cells and development.

[21]  B. Geiger,et al.  Environmental sensing through focal adhesions , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[22]  F. Guilak,et al.  Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[23]  Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al.  Harnessing nanotopography and integrin-matrix interactions to influence stem cell fate. , 2014, Nature materials.

[24]  Choon Kiat Lim,et al.  Nanotopography modulates mechanotransduction of stem cells and induces differentiation through focal adhesion kinase. , 2013, ACS nano.

[25]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Micropatterning tractional forces in living cells. , 2002, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[26]  D. Stamenović,et al.  Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[27]  Miguel Vicente-Manzanares,et al.  Non-muscle myosin II takes centre stage in cell adhesion and migration , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[28]  R. Fässler,et al.  Mechanosensitivity and compositional dynamics of cell–matrix adhesions , 2013, EMBO reports.

[29]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins, cytoskeletal filaments, and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Todd C. McDevitt,et al.  Materials as stem cell regulators. , 2014, Nature materials.

[31]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[32]  I. N. Sneddon The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile , 1965 .

[33]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[34]  Evelyn K F Yim,et al.  Nanotopography/mechanical induction of stem-cell differentiation. , 2010, Methods in cell biology.

[35]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[36]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Cell organization in soft media due to active mechanosensing , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Sohail Ahmed,et al.  Investigating the spatial distribution of integrin β₁ in patterned human mesenchymal stem cells using super-resolution imaging. , 2014, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[38]  J. Bechhoefer,et al.  Calibration of atomic‐force microscope tips , 1993 .

[39]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Integrins in Mechanotransduction* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[41]  Christopher S. Chen Mechanotransduction – a field pulling together? , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[42]  Lay Poh Tan,et al.  Micropatterned matrix directs differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells towards myocardial lineage. , 2010, Experimental cell research.

[43]  Dennis E. Discher,et al.  Adhesion-contractile balance in myocyte differentiation , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[44]  Michael W. Davidson,et al.  Nanoscale architecture of integrin-based cell adhesions , 2010, Nature.

[45]  Milan Mrksich,et al.  Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Karine Glinel,et al.  Bioactive chemical nanopatterns impact human mesenchymal stem cell fate. , 2013, Nano letters.

[47]  L. P. Tan,et al.  Bio-inspired micropatterned platform to steer stem cell differentiation. , 2011, Small.

[48]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[49]  Winston Shim,et al.  Functional Morphometric Analysis in Cellular Behaviors: Shape and Size Matter , 2013, Advanced healthcare materials.