Quantification of valvular aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND Assessing the aortic valvular orifice is important in judging the severity of aortic stenosis. Magnetic resonance imaging visualizes in-plane valvular motion. We studied the value of magnetic resonance planimetry of the aortic valve orifice. METHODS We used breath-hold gradient echocardiographic sequences on a clinical magnetic resonance system (1.5 T) and studied 25 patients with symptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. We performed a planimetry of the valvular orifice in systolic images of the valvular plane. The results were compared with echocardiography (continuity equation) and cardiac catheterization (Gorlin formula). RESULTS Magnetic resonance planimetry was feasible in all patients, and the image quality was invariably adequate. The magnetic resonance imaging results correlated well with the data calculated from catheterization and less robustly with the echocardiographic results. The 3 methods were similar in terms of leading to clinical decisions. CONCLUSIONS We suggest that magnetic resonance flow planimetry of the aortic valve orifice offers a simple, reliable, fast, and safe method to noninvasively quantify aortic stenosis.

[1]  J. Schulz-Menger,et al.  Magnetic resonance planimetry of the vena contracta as a new approach to assessment of stenotic heart valves: An in vitro study , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  J. Schulz-Menger,et al.  The value of magnetic resonance imaging of the left ventricular outflow tract in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy after septal artery embolization. , 2000, Circulation.

[3]  P Boesiger,et al.  Heart motion adapted cine phase‐contrast flow measurements through the aortic valve , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  K. Karsch,et al.  Extent, determinants and clinical importance of pressure recovery in patients with aortic valve stenosis. , 1999, European heart journal.

[5]  M. Viergever,et al.  MR phase‐contrast flow measurement with limited spatial resolution in small vessels: Value of model‐based image analysis , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  E. Antman,et al.  Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary , 1998, Circulation.

[7]  C. Tribouilloy,et al.  Comparative value of Doppler echocardiography and cardiac catheterization in the decision to operate on patients with aortic stenosis. , 1998, International journal of cardiology.

[8]  R. Shandas,et al.  Analysis of the effect of flow rate on the Doppler continuity equation for stenotic orifice area calculations: a numerical study. , 1998, Circulation.

[9]  F. Schiele,et al.  Planimetry of aortic valve area using multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography is not a reliable method for assessing severity of aortic stenosis. , 1997, Heart.

[10]  R. Petitclerc,et al.  Simultaneous determination of aortic valve area by the Gorlin formula and by transesophageal echocardiography under different transvalvular flow conditions. Evidence that anatomic aortic valve area does not change with variations in flow in aortic stenosis. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  H. Baumgartner,et al.  Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Role of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro. , 1996, Circulation.

[12]  C R Thompson,et al.  Comparison of transesophageal echocardiographic, fick, and thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients. , 1996, Journal of critical care.

[13]  J. L. Fischer,et al.  Comparison of Doppler echocardiographic methods with heart catheterisation in assessing aortic valve area in 100 patients with aortic stenosis. , 1995, British heart journal.

[14]  C. Otto,et al.  Flow dependence of measures of aortic stenosis severity during exercise. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  M. Zile,et al.  Effect of catheter positioning on the variability of measured gradient in aortic stenosis. , 1993, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[16]  F. Ståhlberg,et al.  Valve area and cardiac output in aortic stenosis: quantification by magnetic resonance velocity mapping. , 1993, American heart journal.

[17]  M. Nieminen,et al.  Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  L. Axel,et al.  Cine MR Imaging in Aortic Stenosis , 1989, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[19]  C. Higgins,et al.  Cine MR imaging: potential for the evaluation of cardiovascular function. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  E. K. Weir,et al.  Analysis of the complications of cardiac catheterization over nine years. , 1982, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[21]  R. E. Shipley,et al.  THE EFFECT OF EXTERNAL CONSTRICTION OF A BLOOD VESSEL ON BLOOD FLOW , 1944 .