Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Surgery Compared to Conventional Surgical Approaches (Laparoscopic or Open)

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Objective: Describe clinical outcomes (eg, postoperative complications, survival) after robotic surgery compared to open or laparoscopic surgery. Background: Robotic surgery utilization has increased over the years across a wide range of surgical procedures. However, evidence supporting improved clinical outcomes after robotic surgery is limited. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of systematic reviews from inception to January 2019 for systematic reviews describing postoperative outcomes after robotic surgery. We qualitatively described patient outcomes of commonly performed robotic procedures: radical prostatectomy, hysterectomy, lobectomy, thymectomy, rectal resection, partial nephrectomy, distal gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, hepatectomy, distal pancreatectomy, and cholecystectomy. Results: One hundred fifty-four systematic reviews included 336 studies and 18 randomized controlled trials reporting on patient outcomes after robotic compared to laparoscopic or open procedures. Data from the randomized controlled trials demonstrate that robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy offered fewer biochemical recurrence and improvement in quality of recovery and pain scores only up to 6 weeks postoperatively compared to open radical prostatectomy. When compared to laparoscopic prostatectomy, robotic surgery offered improved urinary and sexual functions. Robotic surgery for endometrial cancer had fewer conversion to open compared to laparoscopic. Otherwise, robotic surgery outcomes were similar to conventional surgical approaches for other procedures except for radical hysterectomy where minimally invasive approaches may result in patient harm compared to open approach. Conclusion: Robotic surgery has been widely incorporated into practise despite limited supporting evidence. More rigorous research focused on patient-important benefits is needed before further expansion of robotic surgery.

[1]  Mark P. MacEachern,et al.  The Impact of Corporate Payments on Robotic Surgery Research: A Systematic Review , 2019, Annals of surgery.

[2]  C. Peng,et al.  Clinical efficacy of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic liver resection: a meta analysis. , 2019, Asian journal of surgery.

[3]  V. Gebski,et al.  Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Jason D. Wright,et al.  Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early‐Stage Cervical Cancer , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  M. Talamini,et al.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery: a systematic review evaluating Cochrane systematic reviews , 2018, Surgical Endoscopy.

[6]  R. Sotelo,et al.  Impact of Host Factors on Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Outcomes: Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis , 2018, The Journal of urology.

[7]  Kehu Yang,et al.  Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2018, Obesity Surgery.

[8]  H. Samaratunga,et al.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. , 2018, The Lancet. Oncology.

[9]  J. Donovan,et al.  Progress in clinical research in surgery and IDEAL , 2018, The Lancet.

[10]  Kehu Yang,et al.  Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  D. Murphy,et al.  Laparoscopic and robot‐assisted vs open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: a Cochrane systematic review , 2018, BJU international.

[12]  D. Tilki,et al.  Robotic-assisted vs. open radical prostatectomy: an update to the never-ending debate , 2018, Translational andrology and urology.

[13]  Ti-Chum Wang,et al.  Robotic-assisted vs. laparoscopic and abdominal myomectomy for treatment of uterine fibroids: a meta-analysis , 2018, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[14]  G. Strippoli,et al.  Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2017, Annals of surgery.

[15]  Ke Chen,et al.  Robotic versus laparoscopic Gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis , 2017, BMC Surgery.

[16]  T. Ind,et al.  A comparison of operative outcomes between standard and robotic laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2017, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[17]  J. Heinz,et al.  Robotic versus thoracoscopic thymectomy: The current evidence , 2017, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[18]  W. Liang,et al.  Robotic Versus Video-assisted Lobectomy/Segmentectomy for Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis , 2017, Annals of surgery.

[19]  J. Yun,et al.  Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[20]  J. Heinz,et al.  Thymectomy via open surgery or robotic video assisted thoracic surgery , 2017, Medicine.

[21]  I. Gill,et al.  Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Expanding Utilization, Advancing Innovation. , 2017, Journal of endourology.

[22]  J. Blazeby,et al.  Delivering successful randomized controlled trials in surgery: Methods to optimize collaboration and study design , 2017, Clinical trials.

[23]  Jie-shou Li,et al.  Male urinary and sexual function after robotic pelvic autonomic nerve‐preserving surgery for rectal cancer , 2017, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[24]  T. Dalsgaard,et al.  Robot‐assisted surgery in gynecological oncology: current status and controversies on patient benefits, cost and surgeon conditions – a systematic review , 2017, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[25]  Xinghuan Wang,et al.  Comparison of perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes between standard laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis , 2017, Surgical Endoscopy.

[26]  T. Luukkaala,et al.  Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. , 2016, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  R. Califf,et al.  Need for a National Evaluation System for Health Technology. , 2016, JAMA.

[28]  Robert A Gardiner,et al.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study , 2016, The Lancet.

[29]  Bruce Campbell,et al.  IDEAL-D: a rational framework for evaluating and regulating the use of medical devices , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[30]  P. Dahm,et al.  Application of the IDEAL framework to robotic urologic surgery. , 2014, European urology.

[31]  Art Sedrakyan,et al.  Robotic surgery: revisiting “no innovation without evaluation” , 2013, BMJ.

[32]  Laura A. Hatfield,et al.  Postmarket surveillance for medical devices: America’s new strategy , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[33]  I. Boutron,et al.  Outcomes in Registered, Ongoing Randomized Controlled Trials of Patient Education , 2012, PloS one.

[34]  Michelle Fiander,et al.  THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RESTRICTION ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-BASED META-ANALYSES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES , 2012, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[35]  V. Patel,et al.  Robotic technologies in surgical oncology training and practice. , 2011, Surgical oncology.

[36]  J. Padillo,et al.  [Prospective randomised study: robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer resection]. , 2011, Cirugia espanola.

[37]  Filippo Annino,et al.  Randomized comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. , 2011, The journal of sexual medicine.

[38]  Jane M Blazeby,et al.  Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation , 2009, The Lancet.

[39]  L. Feldman,et al.  Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations , 2009, The Lancet.

[40]  David W. Taggart,et al.  No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations , 2009, The Lancet.

[41]  L. Casciola,et al.  Short- and Medium-Term Outcome of Robot-Assisted and Traditional Laparoscopic Rectal Resection , 2009, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[42]  W. Kelley.  The Evolution of Laparoscopy and the Revolution in Surgery in the Decade of the 1990s , 2008, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[43]  N. Kim,et al.  Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excison of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[44]  M. Clarke,et al.  Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[45]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Transition from meeting abstract to full-length journal article for randomized controlled trials. , 2006, JAMA.

[46]  M. Curet,et al.  Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. , 2005, Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery.

[47]  E. Hanly,et al.  Twenty-first century surgery using twenty-first century technology: surgical robotics. , 2004, Current surgery.

[48]  J. Monson,et al.  Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy.

[49]  T. Guo,et al.  Comparison of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic and open resections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2019, Asian journal of surgery.

[50]  J. Black,et al.  Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. , 2016, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.