Networked Chemoreceptors Benefit Bacterial Chemotaxis Performance

ABSTRACT Motile bacteria use large receptor arrays to detect and follow chemical gradients in their environment. Extended receptor arrays, composed of networked signaling complexes, promote cooperative stimulus control of their associated signaling kinases. Here, we used structural lesions at the communication interface between core complexes to create an Escherichia coli strain with functional but dispersed signaling complexes. This strain allowed us to directly study how networking of signaling complexes affects chemotactic signaling and gradient-tracking performance. We demonstrate that networking of receptor complexes provides bacterial cells with about 10-fold-heightened detection sensitivity to attractants while maintaining a wide dynamic range over which receptor adaptational modifications can tune response sensitivity. These advantages proved especially critical for chemotaxis toward an attractant source under conditions in which bacteria are unable to alter the attractant gradient. IMPORTANCE Chemoreceptor arrays are found in many motile bacteria. However, although our understanding of bacterial chemotaxis is quite detailed, the signaling and behavioral advantages of networked receptor arrays had not been directly studied in cells. We have recently shown that lesions in a key interface of the E. coli receptor array diminish physical connections and functional coupling between core signaling complexes while maintaining their basic signaling capacity. In this study, we exploited an interface 2 mutant to show, for the first time, that coupling between core complexes substantially enhances stimulus detection and chemotaxis performance. Chemoreceptor arrays are found in many motile bacteria. However, although our understanding of bacterial chemotaxis is quite detailed, the signaling and behavioral advantages of networked receptor arrays had not been directly studied in cells. We have recently shown that lesions in a key interface of the E. coli receptor array diminish physical connections and functional coupling between core signaling complexes while maintaining their basic signaling capacity. In this study, we exploited an interface 2 mutant to show, for the first time, that coupling between core complexes substantially enhances stimulus detection and chemotaxis performance.

[1]  J. Falke,et al.  Evidence That Both Ligand Binding and Covalent Adaptation Drive a Two-State Equilibrium in the Aspartate Receptor Signaling Complex , 2001, The Journal of general physiology.

[2]  Davi R. Ortega,et al.  Universal architecture of bacterial chemoreceptor arrays , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Howard C. Berg,et al.  E. coli in Motion , 2003 .

[4]  Mingshan Li,et al.  Adaptational assistance in clusters of bacterial chemoreceptors , 2005, Molecular microbiology.

[5]  Jun Liu,et al.  Molecular architecture of chemoreceptor arrays revealed by cryoelectron tomography of Escherichia coli minicells , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  G. L. Hazelbauer,et al.  Core unit of chemotaxis signaling complexes , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  G. L. Hazelbauer,et al.  The Chemoreceptor Dimer Is the Unit of Conformational Coupling and Transmembrane Signaling , 2010, Journal of bacteriology.

[8]  A. Vaknin,et al.  The role of motility and chemotaxis in the bacterial colonization of protected surfaces , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[9]  N. Wingreen,et al.  A dynamic-signaling-team model for chemotaxis receptors in Escherichia coli , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Insights into the organization and dynamics of bacterial chemoreceptor clusters through in vivo crosslinking studies , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  The source of high signal cooperativity in bacterial chemosensory arrays , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Y. Tu,et al.  Logarithmic sensing in Escherichia coli bacterial chemotaxis. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[13]  Ned S. Wingreen,et al.  Precise adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through “assistance neighborhoods” , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  M. Blackman,et al.  A new release on life: emerging concepts in proteolysis and parasite invasion , 2005, Molecular microbiology.

[15]  Roman Stocker,et al.  Response rescaling in bacterial chemotaxis , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  CryoEM and computer simulations reveal a novel kinase conformational switch in bacterial chemotaxis signaling , 2015, eLife.

[17]  H. Berg,et al.  Functional interactions between receptors in bacterial chemotaxis , 2004, Nature.

[18]  M. Manson,et al.  Cooperative signaling among bacterial chemoreceptors. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[19]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  cheA, cheB, and cheC genes of Escherichia coli and their role in chemotaxis , 1976, Journal of bacteriology.

[20]  D. Bray,et al.  Simulated Diffusion of Phosphorylated CheY through the Cytoplasm of Escherichia coli , 2005, Journal of bacteriology.

[21]  Thierry Emonet,et al.  Adaptation Dynamics in Densely Clustered Chemoreceptors , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Signaling and sensory adaptation in Escherichia coli chemoreceptors: 2015 update. , 2015, Trends in microbiology.

[23]  R. Colin,et al.  Fast, high-throughput measurement of collective behaviour in a bacterial population , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[24]  H. Berg,et al.  Physical responses of bacterial chemoreceptors. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  A. Vaknin,et al.  Prolonged stimuli alter the bacterial chemosensory clusters , 2013, Molecular microbiology.

[26]  H. Berg,et al.  Localization of components of the chemotaxis machinery of Escherichia coli using fluorescent protein fusions , 2000, Molecular microbiology.

[27]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Functional suppression of HAMP domain signaling defects in the E. coli serine chemoreceptor. , 2014, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  H. Berg,et al.  Impulse responses in bacterial chemotaxis , 1982, Cell.

[29]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Isolation and behavior of Escherichia coli deletion mutants lacking chemotaxis functions , 1982, Journal of bacteriology.

[30]  G. Jensen,et al.  Bacterial chemoreceptor arrays are hexagonally packed trimers of receptor dimers networked by rings of kinase and coupling proteins , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Robert G. Endres,et al.  Chemotactic Response and Adaptation Dynamics in Escherichia coli , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[32]  Monica L. Skoge,et al.  Chemosensing in Escherichia coli: two regimes of two-state receptors. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Hiroto Takahashi,et al.  Direct Imaging of Intracellular Signaling Components That Regulate Bacterial Chemotaxis , 2014, Science Signaling.

[34]  G. L. Hazelbauer,et al.  Selective allosteric coupling in core chemotaxis signaling complexes , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Igor B. Zhulin,et al.  The 3.2 Å resolution structure of a receptor: CheA:CheW signaling complex defines overlapping binding sites and key residue interactions within bacterial chemosensory arrays. , 2013, Biochemistry.

[36]  R. Weis,et al.  Covalent Modification Regulates Ligand Binding to Receptor Complexes in the Chemosensory System of Escherichia coli , 2000, Cell.

[37]  D. Bray,et al.  Receptor clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity , 1998, Nature.

[38]  A. Vaknin,et al.  The physical and functional thermal sensitivity of bacterial chemoreceptors. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  Victor Sourjik,et al.  In vivo measurement by FRET of pathway activity in bacterial chemotaxis. , 2007, Methods in enzymology.

[40]  L. Shapiro,et al.  Polar location of the chemoreceptor complex in the Escherichia coli cell. , 1993, Science.

[41]  Ellen S. Vitetta,et al.  An allosteric model for heterogeneous receptor complexes : Understanding bacterial chemotaxis responses to multiple stimuli , 2006 .

[42]  Y. Tu Quantitative modeling of bacterial chemotaxis: signal amplification and accurate adaptation. , 2013, Annual review of biophysics.

[43]  G. L. Hazelbauer,et al.  Effects of glutamines and glutamates at sites of covalent modification of a methyl-accepting transducer , 1990, Journal of bacteriology.

[44]  H. Berg,et al.  Temporal comparisons in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  D. Koshland,et al.  Tuning the responsiveness of a sensory receptor via covalent modification. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[46]  H. Berg,et al.  Osmotic stress mechanically perturbs chemoreceptors in Escherichia coli. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  T. Duke,et al.  Heightened sensitivity of a lattice of membrane receptors. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  J. Adler,et al.  The effect of environmental conditions on the motility of Escherichia coli. , 1967, Journal of general microbiology.

[49]  X. Liu,et al.  The FlhD/FlhC complex, a transcriptional activator of the Escherichia coli flagellar class II operons , 1994, Journal of bacteriology.

[50]  H. Berg,et al.  A modular gradient-sensing network for chemotaxis in Escherichia coli revealed by responses to time-varying stimuli , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[51]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Constitutively signaling fragments of Tsr, the Escherichia coli serine chemoreceptor , 1994, Journal of bacteriology.

[52]  A. Oppenheim,et al.  Ler Is a Negative Autoregulator of the LEE1 Operon in Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli , 2005, Journal of bacteriology.

[53]  J. Changeux,et al.  ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL. , 1965, Journal of molecular biology.

[54]  H. Berg,et al.  Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  Bo Hu,et al.  Behaviors and Strategies of Bacterial Navigation in Chemical and Nonchemical Gradients , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..