Multi-modal Brain Connectivity Study Using Deep Collaborative Learning

Functional connectivities in the brain explain how different brain regions interact with each other when conducting a specific activity. Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) based models, have been used to detect correlations and to analyze brain connectivities which further help explore how the brain works. However, the data representation of CCA lacks label related information and may be limited when applied to functional connectivity study. Collaborative regression was proposed to address the limitation of CCA by combining correlation analysis and regression. However, both prediction and correlation are sacrificed as linear collaborative regression use the same set of projections on both correlation and regression. We propose a novel method, deep collaborative learning (DCL), to address the limitations of CCA and collaborative regression. DCL improves collaborative regression by combining correlation analysis and label information using deep networks, which may lead to better performance both for classification/prediction and for correlation detection. Results demonstrated the out-performance of DCL over other conventional models in terms of classification accuracy. Experiments showed the difference of brain connectivities between different age groups may be more significant than that between different cognition groups.

[1]  Gary J. Robertson,et al.  Wide‐Range Achievement Test , 2010 .

[2]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Estimation of Dynamic Sparse Connectivity Patterns From Resting State fMRI , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Neuroimaging of the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort , 2014, NeuroImage.

[4]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Correspondence between fMRI and SNP data by group sparse canonical correlation analysis , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[5]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Joint Blind Source Separation by Multiset Canonical Correlation Analysis , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[6]  Jeff A. Bilmes,et al.  Deep Canonical Correlation Analysis , 2013, ICML.

[7]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Human brain networks in health and disease , 2009, Current opinion in neurology.

[8]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Collaborative regression. , 2014, Biostatistics.

[9]  Shannon L. Risacher,et al.  Structured sparse canonical correlation analysis for brain imaging genetics: an improved GraphNet method , 2016, Bioinform..

[10]  Yu-Ping Wang,et al.  Unified tests for fine scale mapping and identifying sparse high-dimensional sequence associations , 2015, Bioinform..

[11]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Adaptive Sparse Multiple Canonical Correlation Analysis With Application to Imaging (Epi)Genomics Study of Schizophrenia , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  H. Hotelling Relations Between Two Sets of Variates , 1936 .

[13]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data , 2009, NeuroImage.

[14]  Sarah Feldt Muldoon,et al.  On Human Brain Networks in Health and Disease , 2015 .

[15]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Time-Varying Brain Connectivity in fMRI Data: Whole-brain data-driven approaches for capturing and characterizing dynamic states , 2016, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[16]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Integrating Imaging Genomic Data in the Quest for Biomarkers of Schizophrenia Disease , 2018, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

[17]  G. S. Wilkinson,et al.  Wide Range Achievement Test 4 , 2016 .

[18]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Integration of SNPs-FMRI-methylation data with sparse multi-CCA for schizophrenia study , 2016, 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[19]  V. Calhoun,et al.  The Chronnectome: Time-Varying Connectivity Networks as the Next Frontier in fMRI Data Discovery , 2014, Neuron.