Concise Review: Epigenetic Mechanisms Contribute to Pluripotency and Cell Lineage Determination of Embryonic Stem Cells

Epigenetic mechanisms, such as histone modifications and DNA methylation, have been shown to play a key role in the regulation of gene transcription. Results of recent studies indicate that a novel “bivalent” chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells (ESCs), wherein a number of untranscribed lineage‐control genes, such as Sox1, Nkx2‐2, Msx1, Irx3, and Pax3, are epigenetically modified with a unique combination of activating and repressive histone modifications that prime them for potential activation (or repression) upon cell lineage induction and differentiation. However, results of these studies also showed that a subset of lineage‐control genes, such as Myf5 and Mash1, were not marked by these histone modifications, suggesting that distinct epigenetic mechanisms might exist for lineage‐control genes in ESCs. In this review article, we summarize evidence regarding possible mechanisms that control these unique histone modifications at lineage‐control gene loci in ESCs and consider their possible contribution to ESC pluripotency. In addition, we propose a novel “histone modification pulsing” model wherein individual pluripotent stem cells within the inner cell mass of blastocysts undergo transient asynchronous histone modifications at these developmental gene loci, thereby conferring differential responsiveness to environmental cues and morphogenic gradients important for cell lineage determination. Finally, we consider how these rapid histone modification exchanges become progressively more stable as ESCs undergo differentiation and maturation into specialized cell lineages.

[1]  G. Keller,et al.  In vitro differentiation of embryonic stem cells. , 1995, Current opinion in cell biology.

[2]  M. Murakami,et al.  The Homeoprotein Nanog Is Required for Maintenance of Pluripotency in Mouse Epiblast and ES Cells , 2003, Cell.

[3]  L. Tora,et al.  Formation of an Active Tissue-Specific Chromatin Domain Initiated by Epigenetic Marking at the Embryonic Stem Cell Stage , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[4]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Histone H3 variants specify modes of chromatin assembly , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Brian D. Strahl,et al.  Role of Histone H3 Lysine 9 Methylation in Epigenetic Control of Heterochromatin Assembly , 2001, Science.

[6]  Stuart L. Schreiber,et al.  Active genes are tri-methylated at K4 of histone H3 , 2002, Nature.

[7]  T. Collins,et al.  Chromatin Modification and the Endothelial-specific Activation of the E-selectin Gene* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  E. Li Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[9]  H. Schöler,et al.  Formation of Pluripotent Stem Cells in the Mammalian Embryo Depends on the POU Transcription Factor Oct4 , 1998, Cell.

[10]  G Vriend,et al.  New POU dimer configuration mediates antagonistic control of an osteopontin preimplantation enhancer by Oct-4 and Sox-2. , 1998, Genes & development.

[11]  K. Struhl Histone acetylation and transcriptional regulatory mechanisms. , 1998, Genes & development.

[12]  J. Martens,et al.  EZH2 and Histone 3 Trimethyl Lysine 27 Associated with Il4 and Il13 Gene Silencing in TH1 Cells* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  James A. Cuff,et al.  A Bivalent Chromatin Structure Marks Key Developmental Genes in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2006, Cell.

[14]  A. Bird,et al.  Methylation-Induced Repression— Belts, Braces, and Chromatin , 1999, Cell.

[15]  Charles Kooperberg,et al.  The histone modification pattern of active genes revealed through genome-wide chromatin analysis of a higher eukaryote. , 2004, Genes & development.

[16]  Ignacio A. Demarco,et al.  Monitoring dynamic protein interactions with photoquenching FRET , 2006, Nature Methods.

[17]  Youngchang Kim,et al.  Molecular basis for the discrimination of repressive methyl-lysine marks in histone H3 by Polycomb and HP1 chromodomains. , 2003, Genes & development.

[18]  N. Hattori,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation status of CpG islands in embryoid bodies, teratomas, and fetuses. , 2003, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[19]  A. Smith,et al.  Embryo-derived stem cells: of mice and men. , 2001, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[20]  Ira M. Hall,et al.  Establishment and Maintenance of a Heterochromatin Domain , 2002, Science.

[21]  O. McDonald,et al.  Control of SRF binding to CArG box chromatin regulates smooth muscle gene expression in vivo. , 2005, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[22]  A. Bradley,et al.  Formation of germ-line chimaeras from embryo-derived teratocarcinoma cell lines , 1984, Nature.

[23]  M. Kaufman,et al.  Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos , 1981, Nature.

[24]  Maurizio Zuccotti,et al.  Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei , 1998, Nature.

[25]  C. Emerson,et al.  Myogenic regulatory factors and the specification of muscle progenitors in vertebrate embryos. , 2002, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[26]  D. Reinberg,et al.  PR-Set7-dependent methylation of histone H4 Lys 20 functions in repression of gene expression and is essential for mitosis. , 2005, Genes & development.

[27]  J. Zeitlinger,et al.  Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells , 2006, Nature.

[28]  C. Allis,et al.  Translating the Histone Code , 2001, Science.

[29]  John R. Yates,et al.  Chd1 chromodomain links histone H3 methylation with SAGA- and SLIK-dependent acetylation , 2005, Nature.

[30]  D. Reinberg,et al.  The key to development: interpreting the histone code? , 2005, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[31]  Megan F. Cole,et al.  Core Transcriptional Regulatory Circuitry in Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2005, Cell.

[32]  J. Miyazaki,et al.  Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[33]  T. Misteli,et al.  Neural induction promotes large-scale chromatin reorganisation of the Mash1 locus , 2006, Journal of Cell Science.

[34]  J. Nichols,et al.  BMP Induction of Id Proteins Suppresses Differentiation and Sustains Embryonic Stem Cell Self-Renewal in Collaboration with STAT3 , 2003, Cell.

[35]  G. Mandel,et al.  REST and Its Corepressors Mediate Plasticity of Neuronal Gene Chromatin throughout Neurogenesis , 2005, Cell.

[36]  M. Tada,et al.  Histone Code Modifications on Pluripotential Nuclei of Reprogrammed Somatic Cells , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[37]  B. Turner,et al.  Epigenetic characterization of the early embryo with a chromatin immunoprecipitation protocol applicable to small cell populations , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[38]  M. Ehrlich,et al.  Histone modification in constitutive heterochromatin versus unexpressed euchromatin in human cells , 2004, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[39]  J. Fish,et al.  The Expression of Endothelial Nitric-oxide Synthase Is Controlled by a Cell-specific Histone Code* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  Neil Brockdorff,et al.  Stabilization of Xist RNA Mediates Initiation of X Chromosome Inactivation , 1997, Cell.

[41]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Early lineage segregation between epiblast and primitive endoderm in mouse blastocysts through the Grb2-MAPK pathway. , 2006, Developmental cell.

[42]  K. Akashi Lineage Promiscuity and Plasticity in Hematopoietic Development , 2005, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[43]  R. Kingston,et al.  Cooperation between Complexes that Regulate Chromatin Structure and Transcription , 2002, Cell.

[44]  W. Reik,et al.  Epigenetic Reprogramming in Mammalian Development , 2001, Science.

[45]  X. Chen,et al.  The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[46]  D. Skalnik,et al.  CpG-binding Protein (CXXC Finger Protein 1) Is a Component of the Mammalian Set1 Histone H3-Lys4 Methyltransferase Complex, the Analogue of the Yeast Set1/COMPASS Complex* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[47]  Ignacio A. Demarco,et al.  Quantitative imaging of protein interactions in the cell nucleus. , 2005, BioTechniques.

[48]  S. Elgin,et al.  Epigenetic Codes for Heterochromatin Formation and Silencing Rounding up the Usual Suspects , 2002, Cell.

[49]  Tom Misteli,et al.  Global Nature of Dynamic Protein-Chromatin Interactions In Vivo: Three-Dimensional Genome Scanning and Dynamic Interaction Networks of Chromatin Proteins , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[50]  R. Kingston,et al.  ATP-dependent remodeling and acetylation as regulators of chromatin fluidity. , 1999, Genes & development.

[51]  Stephan Sauer,et al.  Chromatin signatures of pluripotent cell lines , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[52]  J A Duerre,et al.  IN VIVO METHYLATION AND TURNOVER OF RAT BRAIN HISTONES , 1974, Journal of neurochemistry.

[53]  M. Pazin,et al.  Histone H4-K16 Acetylation Controls Chromatin Structure and Protein Interactions , 2006, Science.

[54]  J. McNally,et al.  The glucocorticoid receptor: rapid exchange with regulatory sites in living cells. , 2000, Science.

[55]  R. Heintzmann,et al.  Polycomb group protein complexes exchange rapidly in living Drosophila , 2005, Development.

[56]  Kazuki Kurimoto,et al.  An improved single-cell cDNA amplification method for efficient high-density oligonucleotide microarray analysis , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[57]  R. Paro,et al.  Epigenetic inheritance of active chromatin after removal of the main transactivator. , 1999, Science.

[58]  Tony Kouzarides,et al.  Spatial Distribution of Di- and Tri-methyl Lysine 36 of Histone H3 at Active Genes* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[59]  R. Mirmira,et al.  Covalent Histone Modifications Underlie the Developmental Regulation of Insulin Gene Transcription in Pancreatic β Cells* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[60]  J. Nichols,et al.  Physiological rationale for responsiveness of mouse embryonic stem cells to gp130 cytokines. , 2001, Development.

[61]  Hengbin Wang,et al.  Role of Histone H3 Lysine 27 Methylation in X Inactivation , 2003, Science.

[62]  T. Misteli,et al.  Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. , 2006, Developmental cell.

[63]  Satoshi Tanaka,et al.  Epigenetic Control of Mouse Oct-4 Gene Expression in Embryonic Stem Cells and Trophoblast Stem Cells* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[64]  J. Nichols,et al.  Functional Expression Cloning of Nanog, a Pluripotency Sustaining Factor in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2003, Cell.

[65]  Megan F. Cole,et al.  Control of Developmental Regulators by Polycomb in Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2006, Cell.

[66]  Tetsuya Tabata,et al.  Morphogens, their identification and regulation , 2004, Development.

[67]  T. Richmond,et al.  Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution , 1997, Nature.