The Contribution of the Corpus Callosum to Language Lateralization

The development of hemispheric lateralization for language is poorly understood. In one hypothesis, early asymmetric gene expression assigns language to the left hemisphere. In an alternate view, language is represented a priori in both hemispheres and lateralization emerges via cross-hemispheric communication through the corpus callosum. To address this second hypothesis, we capitalized on the high temporal and spatial resolution of magnetoencephalographic imaging to measure cortical activity during language processing, speech preparation, and speech execution in 25 participants with agenesis of the corpus callosum (AgCC) and 21 matched neurotypical individuals. In contrast to strongly lateralized left hemisphere activations for language in neurotypical controls, participants with complete or partial AgCC exhibited bilateral hemispheric activations in both auditory or visually driven language tasks, with complete AgCC participants showing significantly more right hemisphere activations than controls or than individuals with partial AgCC. In AgCC individuals, language laterality positively correlated with verbal IQ. These findings suggest that the corpus callosum helps to drive language lateralization. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The role that corpus callosum development has on the hemispheric specialization of language is poorly understood. Here, we used magnetoencephalographic imaging during linguistic tests (verb generation, picture naming) to test for hemispheric dominance in patients with agenesis of the corpus callosum (AgCC) and found reduced laterality (i.e., greater likelihood of bilaterality or right hemisphere dominance) in this cohort compared with controls, especially in patients with complete agenesis. Laterality was positively correlated with behavioral measures of verbal intelligence. These findings provide support for the hypothesis that the callosum aids in functional specialization throughout neural development and that the loss of this mechanism correlates with impairments in verbal performance.

[1]  Heather C Whalley,et al.  Genetic variation in CNTNAP2 alters brain function during linguistic processing in healthy individuals , 2011, American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics.

[2]  Lisa Blaskey,et al.  MEG detection of delayed auditory evoked responses in autism spectrum disorders: towards an imaging biomarker for autism , 2010, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[3]  Andrew L. Alexander,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging of the corpus callosum in Autism , 2007, NeuroImage.

[4]  M. Annett.  Cerebral asymmetry in twins: predictions of the right shift theory , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Agenesis of the corpus callosum: genetic, developmental and functional aspects of connectivity , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  K. Amunts,et al.  Longitudinal changes in brains of patients with fluent primary progressive aphasia , 2014, Brain and Language.

[7]  M. Jeeves,et al.  A further study of language function in callosal agenesis , 1987, Brain and Language.

[8]  A. Hardan,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Corpus Callosum in Autism , 2009, Biological Psychiatry.

[9]  Julia P. Owen,et al.  Robust Bayesian estimation of the location, orientation, and time course of multiple correlated neural sources using MEG , 2010, NeuroImage.

[10]  E. Ringelstein,et al.  Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  David A. Ziegler,et al.  Language‐association cortex asymmetry in autism and specific language impairment , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[12]  Toshiki Yoshimine,et al.  Determination of language dominance with synthetic aperture magnetometry: comparison with the Wada test , 2004, NeuroImage.

[13]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cognition and the corpus callosum: verbal fluency, visuospatial ability, and language lateralization related to midsagittal surface areas of callosal subregions. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[14]  R. Kahn,et al.  Effects of an extra X chromosome on language lateralization: An fMRI study with Klinefelter men (47,XXY) , 2008, Schizophrenia Research.

[15]  E. Kaplan,et al.  The Boston naming test , 2001 .

[16]  D. Geschwind,et al.  Early Asymmetry of Gene Transcription in Embryonic Human Left and Right Cerebral Cortex , 2005, Science.

[17]  Dorothy V. M. Bishop,et al.  Cerebral dominance for language function in adults with specific language impairment or autism , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  M. Berger,et al.  Dynamics of hemispheric dominance for language assessed by magnetoencephalographic imaging , 2012, Annals of neurology.

[19]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Genetic Variants of FOXP2 and KIAA0319/TTRAP/THEM2 Locus Are Associated with Altered Brain Activation in Distinct Language-Related Regions , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  J. Pujol,et al.  Cerebral lateralization of language in normal left-handed people studied by functional MRI , 1999, Neurology.

[21]  René Westerhausen,et al.  The association of macro- and microstructure of the corpus callosum and language lateralisation , 2006, Brain and Language.

[22]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Five-dimensional neuroimaging: Localization of the time–frequency dynamics of cortical activity , 2008, NeuroImage.

[23]  G. Barnes,et al.  Realistic spatial sampling for MEG beamformer images , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[24]  Michael C. Corballis,et al.  Callosal tracts and patterns of hemispheric dominance: A combined fMRI and DTI study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[25]  M. Gazzaniga.  Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: does the corpus callosum enable the human condition? , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  F. Andermann,et al.  Language lateralization in individuals with callosal agenesis: An fMRI study , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Yufeng Zang,et al.  The macrostructural and microstructural abnormalities of corpus callosum in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A combined morphometric and diffusion tensor MRI study , 2010, Brain Research.

[28]  B. Peterson,et al.  Functional significance of individual variations in callosal area , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Isabelle S. Häberling,et al.  Cerebral asymmetries in monozygotic twins: An fMRI study , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  M. Ohyama,et al.  Bilateral representation of language function. Agenesis of corpus callosum by Wada and PET activation. , 1998, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[31]  J. O’Kusky,et al.  The corpus callosum is larger with right‐hemisphere cerebral speech dominance , 1988, Annals of neurology.

[32]  Jared A. Nielsen,et al.  Decreased interhemispheric functional connectivity in autism. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  J Kassubek,et al.  Bilateral language function in callosal agenesis: an fMRI and DTI study. , 2007, Journal of neurology.

[34]  R. Ophoff,et al.  Linkage Analysis in a Dutch Population Isolate Shows No Major Gene for Left-Handedness or Atypical Language Lateralization , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  A James Barkovich,et al.  Anomalies of the corpus callosum: an MR analysis of the phenotypic spectrum of associated malformations. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[36]  Matcheri S. Keshavan,et al.  Corpus callosum volume in children with autism , 2009, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[37]  M. Larkum,et al.  The Cellular Basis of GABAB-Mediated Interhemispheric Inhibition , 2012, Science.

[38]  G. H. Freeman,et al.  Note on an exact treatment of contingency, goodness of fit and other problems of significance. , 1951, Biometrika.

[39]  M. Senda,et al.  Bilateral Representation of Language Function , 1998 .

[40]  Se Robinson,et al.  Functional neuroimaging by Synthetic Aperture Magnetometry (SAM) , 1999 .

[41]  J. D. Macklis,et al.  Development, specification, and diversity of callosal projection neurons , 2011, Trends in Neurosciences.

[42]  Bijan Pesaran,et al.  Sensory-motor transformations for speech occur bilaterally , 2014, Nature.

[43]  D. Geschwind,et al.  Heritability of lobar brain volumes in twins supports genetic models of cerebral laterality and handedness , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  J. Schoffelen,et al.  Beta oscillations relate to the N400m during language comprehension , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[45]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  On the Adaptive Control of the False Discovery Rate in Multiple Testing With Independent Statistics , 2000 .

[46]  N. Cook,et al.  Callosal inhibition: the key to the brain code. , 1984, Behavioral science.

[47]  Helen Tager-Flusberg,et al.  Language laterality in autism spectrum disorder and typical controls: A functional, volumetric, and diffusion tensor MRI study , 2010, Brain and Language.

[48]  Ralph-Axel Müller,et al.  Atypical functional lateralization of language in autism spectrum disorders , 2008, Brain Research.

[49]  Gareth R. Barnes,et al.  Group imaging of task-related changes in cortical synchronisation using nonparametric permutation testing , 2003, NeuroImage.

[50]  P. Teale,et al.  Auditory M100 component 1: relationship to Heschl's gyri. , 1994, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[51]  D. Bishop.  Cerebral Asymmetry and Language Development: Cause, Correlate, or Consequence? , 2013, Science.

[52]  Ferath Kherif,et al.  Explaining Function with Anatomy: Language Lateralization and Corpus Callosum Size , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.