An efficient and lightweight method for Service Level Agreement assessment

Traditional approaches to on-line end-to-end Service Level Agreement (SLA) assessment have focused on the estimation of network QoS parameters. These approaches, however, face a trade-off between accuracy and the amount of resources needed to achieve such accuracy. This paper offers an alternative approach, where instead of estimating QoS parameters, we propose an effective and lightweight solution for directly detecting SLA violations. Our solution monitors the Inter-Packet Arrival Time (IPAT) at an end-point, wherein current IPAT distributions are periodically compared with a set of reference IPAT distributions as the main basis for detecting SLA violations. A mapping of the IPAT distribution with the current network conditions is derived, and a training algorithm that dynamically acquires the set of reference IPAT distributions is designed. For the comparison of the IPAT distributions, we propose a variant of the Hausdorff Distance algorithm. Our variant provides a better accuracy than the traditional Hausdorff Distance, while presenting linear complexity. Our proposal is validated in a real testbed, by comparing the SLA violations detected and the resources required in terms of bandwidth, with other existing alternatives as well as with perfect knowledge of current network QoS status.

[1]  Jordi Domingo-Pascual,et al.  Network Performance Assessment Using Adaptive Traffic Sampling , 2008, Networking.

[2]  Philippe Owezarski,et al.  Towards an Efficient Service Level Agreement Assessment , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[3]  Jordi Domingo-Pascual,et al.  Distributed sampling for on-line SLA assessment , 2008, 2008 16th IEEE Workshop on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks.

[4]  Mikhail J. Atallah,et al.  A Linear Time Algorithm for the Hausdorff Distance Between Convex Polygons , 1983, Inf. Process. Lett..

[5]  SommersJoel,et al.  Improving accuracy in end-to-end packet loss measurement , 2005 .

[6]  Debashis Kushary,et al.  Bootstrap Methods and Their Application , 2000, Technometrics.

[7]  Anura P. Jayasumana,et al.  Overcoming the effects of correlation in packet delay measurements using inter-packet gaps , 2004, Proceedings. 2004 12th IEEE International Conference on Networks (ICON 2004) (IEEE Cat. No.04EX955).

[8]  René Serral Gracià Towards end-to-end sla assessment , 2009 .

[9]  Paul Barford,et al.  Improving accuracy in end-to-end packet loss measurement , 2005, SIGCOMM '05.

[10]  Anura P. Jayasumana,et al.  A Measurement-Based Modeling Approach for Network-Induced Packet Delay , 2007, 32nd IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN 2007).

[11]  Nazim Agoulmine,et al.  Internet Service Pricing Based on User and Service Profiles , 2004, ICT.

[12]  Philippe Owezarski,et al.  LaasNetExp: a generic polymorphic platform for network emulation and experiments , 2008 .

[13]  Vern Paxson,et al.  Strategies for sound internet measurement , 2004, IMC '04.

[14]  A. Cabellos-Aparicio,et al.  Packet Loss Estimation Using Distributed Adaptive Sampling , 2008, NOMS Workshops 2008 - IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium Workshops.

[15]  M. Frans Kaashoek,et al.  A measurement study of available bandwidth estimation tools , 2003, IMC '03.

[16]  Paul Barford,et al.  Accurate and efficient SLA compliance monitoring , 2007, SIGCOMM '07.

[17]  Matthew J. Zekauskas,et al.  A One-way Packet Loss Metric for IPPM , 1999, RFC.

[18]  Philippe Owezarski,et al.  Evaluation of active measurement tools for bandwidth estimation in real environment , 2005, Workshop on End-to-End Monitoring Techniques and Services, 2005..

[19]  J. Domingo-Pascual,et al.  Coping with distributed monitoring of QoS-enabled heterogeneous networks , 2008, 2008 4th International Telecommunication Networking Workshop on QoS in Multiservice IP Networks.

[20]  Paul Barford,et al.  Comparing probe-and router-based packet-loss measurement , 2004, IEEE Internet Computing.

[21]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Detecting anomalies in network traffic using maximum entropy estimation , 2005, IMC '05.

[22]  Matthew J. Zekauskas,et al.  A One-way Delay Metric for IPPM , 1999, RFC.

[23]  Anthony C. Davison,et al.  Bootstrap Methods and Their Application , 1998 .

[24]  Tanja Zseby,et al.  Deployment of Sampling Methods for SLA Validation with Non-Intrusive Measurements , 2002 .

[25]  Philip F. Chimento,et al.  IP Packet Delay Variation Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) , 2002, RFC.