Comparison of Two Diagnostic Assays for the Detection of Serum Neutralizing Antibody to Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus

Simple Summary Antibodies are transmitted from a sow to her piglets through milk. Antibodies can be detected through various diagnostic assays and monitoring a sow’s antibody levels in serum may help determine if a detectable immune response could offer protection for piglets. Two diagnostic assays for the detection of neutralizing antibodies for porcine epidemic diarrhea virus were compared in this study. The assays showed moderate agreement and they can be utilized to monitor antibody levels of sows. The high-throughput neutralization assay showed advantages when compared to the fluorescent focus neutralization assay including higher specificity and greater discrimination of results. Abstract Lactogenic immunity is important for the protection of piglets against many pathogens including porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Circulating neutralizing antibodies levels in sow sera may help determine if a detectable immune response could confer protection to piglets. Neutralizing antibodies can be detected through various diagnostic assays. This study evaluated the diagnostic characteristics of two neutralizing antibody assays for porcine epidemic diarrhea virus neutralizing antibodies in serum of challenged gilts. Four treatment groups, control, non-vaccinated, vaccinated prior to challenge, and vaccinated following challenge, were comprised of 20 gilts. Serum sample were collected from each gilt prior to and following challenge with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Samples were evaluated for the presence of neutralizing antibodies via a fluorescent focus neutralization assay and a high-throughput neutralization assay. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for the fluorescent focus neutralization and high-throughput neutralization assays for this study were optimized at a cutoff of a dilution of 80 and 80% fluorescent reduction respectively and demonstrated moderate agreement based off the kappa statistic. The focus fluorescent neutralization and high-throughput neutralization assays can be used to monitor the status of neutralizing antibodies within animals or a population of animals. The high-throughput assay has advantages over the focus fluorescent assay in that it has a higher specificity at the indicated cut-off and the nature of the results allows for more discrimination between individual results.

[1]  L. Giménez-Lirola,et al.  Detection of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus–neutralizing antibody using high-throughput imaging cytometry , 2020, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[2]  A. Vlasova,et al.  Stage of Gestation at Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Infection of Pregnant Swine Impacts Maternal Immunity and Lactogenic Immune Protection of Neonatal Suckling Piglets , 2019, Front. Immunol..

[3]  C. Rademacher,et al.  Efficacy of a commercial porcine epidemic diarrhea virus vaccine at reducing duration of viral shedding in gilts , 2019 .

[4]  P. Gauger,et al.  Serum and mammary secretion antibody responses in porcine epidemic diarrhea-immune gilts following porcine epidemic diarrhea vaccination , 2018 .

[5]  S. Goyal,et al.  Evaluation of biosecurity measures to prevent indirect transmission of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus , 2017, BMC Veterinary Research.

[6]  R. Rowland,et al.  Tissue localization, shedding, virus carriage, antibody response, and aerosol transmission of Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus following inoculation of 4-week-old feeder pigs , 2016, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[7]  P. Gauger,et al.  Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) detection and antibody response in commercial growing pigs , 2016, BMC Veterinary Research.

[8]  L. Giménez-Lirola,et al.  Does Circulating Antibody Play a Role in the Protection of Piglets against Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus? , 2016, PloS one.

[9]  P. H. Arruda,et al.  Characterization of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Isolate US/Iowa/18984/2013 Infection in 1-Day-Old Cesarean-Derived Colostrum-Deprived Piglets , 2016, Veterinary pathology.

[10]  Changhee Lee Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus: An emerging and re-emerging epizootic swine virus , 2015, Virology Journal.

[11]  Jane Christopher-Hennings,et al.  Development of an indirect ELISA, blocking ELISA, fluorescent microsphere immunoassay and fluorescent focus neutralization assay for serologic evaluation of exposure to North American strains of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus , 2015, BMC Veterinary Research.

[12]  S. Furukawa,et al.  A Comparison of the Histological Structure of the Placenta in Experimental Animals , 2014, Journal of toxicologic pathology.

[13]  Qi Chen,et al.  Isolation and Characterization of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Viruses Associated with the 2013 Disease Outbreak among Swine in the United States , 2013, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[14]  K. Schwartz,et al.  Emergence of Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in the United States: clinical signs, lesions, and viral genomic sequences , 2013, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[15]  X. Manteca,et al.  Pain and discomfort caused by parturition in cows and sows , 2011 .

[16]  H. Erb Prior probability (the pretest best guess) affects predictive values of diagnostic tests. , 2011, Veterinary clinical pathology.

[17]  Y. Jang,et al.  Oral efficacy of Vero cell attenuated porcine epidemic diarrhea virus DR13 strain , 2006, Research in Veterinary Science.

[18]  H. Moon,et al.  Comparison of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with serum neutralization test for serodiagnosis of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection. , 2005, Journal of veterinary science.

[19]  A. Carvajal,et al.  Mucosal and systemic isotype-specific antibody responses and protection in conventional pigs exposed to virulent or attenuated porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus. , 2002, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[20]  D. Burton,et al.  The antiviral activity of antibodies in vitro and in vivo , 2001, Advances in Immunology.

[21]  B. Mahy,et al.  Virology methods manual , 1996 .

[22]  F. J. Bourne,et al.  The transfer of immunoglobins IgG, IgA and IgM from serum to colostrum and milk in the sow. , 1973, Immunology.

[23]  H. W. Dunne,et al.  Diseases of Swine , 1971 .