New challenges in organizational research: high reliability organizations

This paper describes a multidisciplinary project concerned with the design and management of hazardous organizations that achieve extremely high lev els of reliable and safe operations. The organizations in which the research is being conducted are the Federal Aviation Administration's Air Traffic Control system, Pacific Gas and Electric Company's electrical distribution system, and two nuclear aircraft carriers of the United States Navy. The paper describes the research strategy and then presents some initial organizational paradoxes and findings. These are discussed in terms of describing the organizations, decision making, interdependence, the "culture" of high reliability and adaptation to technological change. The paper concludes with the admonition that managers in hazardous organizations should consider the cost of safeguards against or ganizational catastrophes versus the costs of catastrophe (in money, lives and public outcry).

[1]  M. Aiken,et al.  Routine Technology, Social Structure, and Organization Goals , 1969 .

[2]  Y. Sunohara,et al.  Minority-carrier control gate turn-off thyristor , 1989 .

[3]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  Gene I. Rochlin,et al.  Informal organizational networking as a crisis- avoidance strategy: US naval flight operations as a case study , 1989 .

[5]  Jennifer J. Halpern.  Cognitive factors influencing decision making in a highly reliable organization , 1989 .

[6]  James A. Sevinsky.  Toxic Chemicals Accidents: Crises That Can Be Prevented , 1987 .

[7]  K. Weick.  Mental models of high reliability systems , 1989 .

[8]  C. Levenstein.  Bhopal: Anatomy of a Crisis , 1988 .

[9]  C. Perrow.  The organizational context of human factors engineering. , 1983, Administrative science quarterly.

[10]  G. Rose.  The Structure of Organizations , 1971 .

[11]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[12]  Robert Lorin Cook.  Behavioral norms and expectations: A quantitative approach to the assessment of organizational culture (Поведенческие нормы и ожидания: количественный подход к оценке организационной культуры) , 1988 .

[13]  Gloria L. Lee,et al.  Dimensions of Organization Structure and their Context: A Replication , 1971 .

[14]  Gene I. Rochlin.  ``High-Reliability'' Organizations and Technical Change: Some Ethical Problems and Dilemmas , 1986, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[15]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  Crisis Prone Versus Crisis Avoiding Organizations Is your company's culture its own worst enemy in creating crises? , 1988 .

[16]  R. A. Cooke,et al.  Behavioral Norms and Expectations , 1988 .

[17]  J. M. Beyer,et al.  Studying Organizational Cultures Through Rites and Ceremonials , 1984 .

[18]  D. Mccormick.  Normal Accidents , 1991, Bio/Technology.

[19]  C. Brodsky.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .

[20]  Karlene H. Roberts,et al.  Research in nearly failure-free, high-reliability organizations: having the bubble , 1989 .

[21]  Rae Zimmerman,et al.  The Government's Role As Stakeholder In Industrial Crises , 1987 .

[22]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[23]  Jon Olson,et al.  Measuring Safety Performance of Potentially Dangerous Technologies , 1987 .

[24]  D. Pugh,et al.  Dimensions of Organization Structure , 1968 .

[25]  R. Abelson.  Decision making and decision theory , 1985 .

[26]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  The uniqueness paradox in organizational stories. , 1983 .

[27]  J. March,et al.  Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol. , 1981 .