Fmri activity patterns in human loc carry information about object exemplars within category

The lateral occipital complex (LOC) is a set of areas in the human occipito-temporal cortex responding to objects as opposed to low-level control stimuli. Conventional functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analysis methods based on regional averages could not detect signals discriminative of different types of objects in this region. Here, we examined fMRI signals using multivariate pattern recognition (support vector classification) to systematically explore the nature of object-related information available in fine-grained activity patterns in the LOC. Distributed fMRI signals from the LOC allowed for above-chance discrimination not only of the category but also of within-category exemplars of everyday man-made objects, and such exemplar-specific information generalized across changes in stimulus size and viewpoint, particularly in posterior subregions. Object identity could also be predicted from responses of the early visual cortex, even significantly across the changes in size and viewpoint used here. However, a dissociation was observed between these two regions of interest in the degree of discrimination for objects relative to size: In the early visual cortex, two different sizes of the same object were even better discriminated than two different objects (in accordance with measures of pixelwise stimulus similarity), whereas the opposite was true in the LOC. These findings provide the first evidence that direct evoked fMRI activity patterns in the LOC can be different for individual object exemplars (within a single category). We propose that pattern recognition methods as used here may provide an alternative approach to study mechanisms of neuronal representation based on aspects of the fMRI response independent of those assessed in adaptation paradigms.

[1]  Minami Ito,et al.  Columns for visual features of objects in monkey inferotemporal cortex , 1992, Nature.

[2]  M. Young,et al.  Sparse population coding of faces in the inferotemporal cortex. , 1992, Science.

[3]  C. Gross,et al.  Representation of visual stimuli in inferior temporal cortex. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  R. Desimone,et al.  Inferior temporal mechanisms for invariant object recognition. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  E T Rolls,et al.  Sparseness of the neuronal representation of stimuli in the primate temporal visual cortex. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Minami Ito,et al.  Size and position invariance of neuronal responses in monkey inferotemporal cortex. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys , 1995, Current Biology.

[9]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  I Biederman,et al.  Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[11]  E. Rolls,et al.  View-invariant representations of familiar objects by neurons in the inferior temporal visual cortex. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al.  Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine , 1998, Cognition.

[13]  T. Poggio,et al.  Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  R Lawson,et al.  Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[15]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[17]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The Representation of Objects in the Human Occipital and Temporal Cortex , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[19]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[20]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Cortical Regions Involved in Perceiving Object Shape , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Z Kourtzi,et al.  Representation of Perceived Object Shape by the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 2001, Science.

[22]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[23]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Differential Effects of Viewpoint on Object-Driven Activation in Dorsal and Ventral Streams , 2002, Neuron.

[24]  T. Shallice,et al.  Face repetition effects in implicit and explicit memory tests as measured by fMRI. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Analysis of the Neuronal Selectivity Underlying Low fMRI Signals , 2002, Current Biology.

[26]  R. Henson,et al.  Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  K. Grill-Spector The neural basis of object perception , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[28]  David D. Cox,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) “brain reading”: detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fMRI activity in human visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[29]  T. Carlson,et al.  Patterns of Activity in the Categorical Representations of Objects , 2003 .

[30]  R. Henson Neuroimaging studies of priming , 2003, Progress in Neurobiology.

[31]  E. Wojciulik,et al.  Attention increases neural selectivity in the human lateral occipital complex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  R. Henson,et al.  BOLD repetition decreases in object-responsive ventral visual areas depend on spatial attention. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Selective Attention Modulates Neural Substrates of Repetition Priming and Implicit Visual Memory: Suppressions and Enhancements Revealed by fMRI , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  Svetlana S. Georgieva,et al.  Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess Adaptation and Size Invariance of Shape Processing by Humans and Monkeys , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Partially Distributed Representations of Objects and Faces in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  G. Rees,et al.  Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Fast Readout of Object Identity from Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex , 2005, Science.

[39]  M. Chun,et al.  Attentional Modulation of Learning-Related Repetition Attenuation Effects in Human Parahippocampal Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A critique of functional localisers , 2006, NeuroImage.

[42]  D. Heeger,et al.  Two Retinotopic Visual Areas in Human Lateral Occipital Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Divide and conquer: A defense of functional localizers , 2006, NeuroImage.

[44]  G. Boynton,et al.  Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[45]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Matching Categorical Object Representations in Inferior Temporal Cortex of Man and Monkey , 2008, Neuron.

[46]  Irving Biederman,et al.  Adaptation to objects in the lateral occipital complex (LOC): Shape or semantics? , 2009, Vision Research.

[47]  Kalanit Grill-Spector,et al.  The representation of object viewpoint in human visual cortex , 2009, NeuroImage.

[48]  Stephen A. Engel,et al.  Engagement of Fusiform Cortex and Disengagement of Lateral Occipital Cortex in the Acquisition of Radiological Expertise , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[49]  G. Aguirre,et al.  Different spatial scales of shape similarity representation in lateral and ventral LOC. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[50]  Benjamin J. Tamber-Rosenau,et al.  Decoding cognitive control in human parietal cortex , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  G. Rees,et al.  Neural correlates of hemianopic completion across the vertical meridian , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[52]  Robert L. Whitwell,et al.  The lateral‐occipital and the inferior‐frontal cortex play different roles during the naming of visually presented objects , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[53]  V. Michel,et al.  Recruitment of an Area Involved in Eye Movements During Mental Arithmetic , 2009, Science.

[54]  Peter A Bandettini,et al.  Seven topics in functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2009, Journal of integrative neuroscience.

[55]  Joseph T. Devlin,et al.  Consistency and variability in functional localisers , 2009, NeuroImage.

[56]  Dominik Heider,et al.  fMRI Data Visualization with BrainBlend and Blender , 2010, Neuroinformatics.

[57]  P. Bandettini,et al.  What's New in Neuroimaging Methods? , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[58]  R. Schubotz,et al.  Motor foundations of higher cognition: similarities and differences in processing regular and violated perceptual sequences of different specificity , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[59]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Dissociable Neural Patterns of Facial Identity across Changes in Viewpoint , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  Denis Schluppeck,et al.  A comparison of fMRI adaptation and multivariate pattern classification analysis in visual cortex , 2010, NeuroImage.