Investigating the evolving context of an unstable approach in aviation from mental model disconnects with an agent-based model

Abstract Unstable approach is an adverse aviation event, and it is strongly related to the interaction between pilots and air traffic controllers (ATCOs). Mental model disconnects among team members can be a major cause of possible interaction conflicts and defective team cognition. Therefore, to study the negative effects of various mental model disconnects, a framework of evolving team cognition (FETC) is proposed to examine the evolving context of an accident. An agent-based model (ABM) is developed to simulate how mental model disconnects are involved in evolving landing scenarios. The results of a simulation conducted with the ABM indicate that mental model disconnects occur more frequently as an aircraft approaches the terminal area. For landing scenarios in the outer area between 100 and 50 nautical miles (Nm), task-related mental model disconnects occur more frequently, causing incompatibility between parties. The incompatibility reveals the necessity of extra coordination to prevent the potential occurrence of system errors. As for the scenarios around the terminal area (30–15 Nm), the team-related mental model disconnects prevail, leading to passive information dissemination regarding changing conditions and late initiation of urgent coordination. The combination of these factors causes a team to miss the window for preventing an adverse event.

[1]  Dominique Estival,et al.  Miscommunication in General Aviation: The Influence of External Factors on Communication Errors , 2015 .

[2]  Erich B. Bergiel,et al.  Understanding the relationship between mental models, conflict and conflict asymmetry , 2015 .

[3]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  A Framework for Developing and Using Shared Mental Models in Human-Agent Teams , 2017 .

[4]  Hamid Demmou,et al.  Reliability analysis of discrete event dynamic systems with Petri nets , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  Punnarumol Temdee Agent-based modeling of collaborative interaction in ubiquitous learning environment using local dynamic behavior , 2015, Artificial Life and Robotics.

[6]  Yang Jiao,et al.  Research on Unstable Approach Detection of Civil Aviation Aircraft , 2018 .

[7]  Bor-Shong Liu,et al.  Inflight workload assessment: comparison of subjective and physiological measurements. , 2003, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[8]  Raghvendra V. Cowlagi,et al.  Coordinability and Consistency in Accident Causation and Prevention: Formal System Theoretic Concepts for Safety in Multilevel Systems , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[9]  Ana L. C. Bazzan,et al.  Multiagent Learning on Traffic Lights Control , 2009, Multi-Agent Systems for Traffic and Transportation Engineering.

[10]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Team Cognition as Interaction , 2015 .

[11]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  Douglas D Boyd,et al.  Accident-precipitating factors for crashes in turbine-powered general aviation aircraft. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Henk A. P. Blom,et al.  Contrasting safety assessments of a runway incursion scenario: Event sequence analysis versus multi-agent dynamic risk modelling , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Structural influences upon coordination and performance in multiteam systems , 2017, Human Resource Management Review.

[15]  Sojung Kim,et al.  Impact of road environment on drivers' behaviors in dilemma zone: Application of agent-based simulation. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  Phoenix - A model-based Human Reliability Analysis methodology: Qualitative Analysis Procedure , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  Unstable approach in aviation: Mental model disconnects between pilots and air traffic controllers and interaction conflicts , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Kathleen L. Mosier,et al.  Pilot–ATC Communication Conflicts: Implications for NextGen , 2013 .

[19]  Hironao Takahashi,et al.  Improving the Understanding between Control Tower Operator and Pilot Using Semantic Techniques — A New Approach , 2017, 2017 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized System (ISADS).

[20]  Sondoss Elsawah,et al.  A methodology for eliciting, representing, and analysing stakeholder knowledge for decision making on complex socio-ecological systems: from cognitive maps to agent-based models. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[21]  Jin Wen,et al.  Simulating the human-building interaction: Development and validation of an agent-based model of office occupant behaviors , 2015 .

[22]  Jessica Mesmer-Magnus,et al.  Measuring Shared Team Mental Models: A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[23]  C. Gibson,et al.  Team Implicit Coordination Processes: A Team Knowledge–Based Approach , 2008 .

[24]  Maxime Reynal,et al.  Investigating pilot’s decision making when facing an unstabilized approach: an eye-tracking study , 2017 .

[25]  Jorg Onno Entzinger,et al.  Assessment of human pilot mental workload in curved approaches , 2013 .

[26]  S. McComb Mental Model Convergence: The Shift from being an Individual to being a Team Member , 2007 .

[27]  Ben J. Searle,et al.  Utilization of prosodic and linguistic cues during perceptions of nonunderstandings in radio communication , 2016, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[28]  Ana L. C. Bazzan,et al.  A review on agent-based technology for traffic and transportation , 2013, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[29]  F. Bryant,et al.  Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. , 1995 .

[30]  Susannah B. F. Paletz,et al.  The Breakdown of Coordinated Decision Making in Distributed Systems , 2010, Hum. Factors.

[31]  Steve Jarvis,et al.  A systems perspective on the unstable approach in commercial aviation , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[32]  A. Borshchev,et al.  From System Dynamics and Discrete Event to Practical Agent Based Modeling : Reasons , Techniques , Tools , 2004 .