Assessing the Ecological Footprint of a Large Metropolitan Water Supplier: Lessons for Water Management and Planning towards Sustainability

Faced with the task of communicating their combined social, environmental and economic impact, water service providers are seeking to report overall performance in an aggregated way. Such a methodology must be scientifically robust, easily communicated and allow benchmarking of performance while reflecting a transition towards sustainability. In this paper the ecological footprint (EF) is calculated for Sydney Water Corporation (SWC), using input-output analysis and land disturbance in an innovative approach that overcomes problems identified in the original EF concept. This pilot study has allowed SWC to gain some valuable insights into its impacts: SWC's annual EF is about 73 100 ha in terms of land disturbance. Of this, 54 000 ha are projected to become disturbed as a consequence of climate change, with the remainder of 19 100 ha being disturbed on SWC's premises (2400 ha) and on those of upstream suppliers (16 700 ha). Total on-site impacts equal 9300 ha, while indirect land disturb ance contributes 63 600 ha. The EF appears promising as an educational and communi cation tool and may have potential as a decision support tool. However, further research is needed to incorporate downstream impacts into the EF, which would have significant benefits to SWC in terms of assessing and communicating the organization's overall progress towards sustainability.

[1]  J. Randers,et al.  Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Clark W. Bullard,et al.  Monte Carlo Sensitivity Analysis of Input-Output Models , 1988 .

[3]  Ian Lowe,et al.  An Ecological Footprint Analysis for Australia , 2000 .

[4]  Marinos E. Tsigas,et al.  Land use and cover in ecological economics , 1996 .

[5]  W. Rees.  Revisiting carrying capacity: Area-based indicators of sustainability , 1996 .

[6]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  Natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept , 1999 .

[7]  Jason Venetoulis.  Assessing the ecological impact of a university , 2001 .

[8]  M. Lenzen,et al.  A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia , 2001 .

[9]  Erwin Lindeijer,et al.  Review of land use impact methodologies , 2000 .

[10]  Edward Smeets,et al.  Ecological footprints of Benin, Bhutan, Costa Rica and the Netherlands , 2000 .

[11]  W. Leontief.  Environmental Repercussions and the Economic Structure: An Input-Output Approach , 1970 .

[12]  Clark W. Bullard,et al.  Effects of parametric uncertainty and technological change on input-output models / CAC No. 156 , 1977 .

[13]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  A Generalized Input-Output Multiplier Calculus for Australia , 2001 .

[14]  J. Xie.  An Environmentally Extended Social Accounting Matrix , 2000 .

[15]  M. Wackernagel,et al.  Urban ecological footprints: Why cities cannot be sustainable—And why they are a key to sustainability , 1996 .

[16]  Wilson,et al.  Landcover disturbance over the Australian continent : a contemporary assessment : a report , 1995 .

[17]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  A hybrid life cycle assessment method for construction , 2000 .

[18]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Errors in Conventional and Input‐Output—based Life—Cycle Inventories , 2000 .

[19]  J. Munksgaard,et al.  Energy and CO2 life-cycle analyses of wind turbines—review and applications , 2002 .

[20]  W. McLennan.  Australian national accounts : input-output tables : product details , 1999 .

[21]  S. Joshi.  Product Environmental Life‐Cycle Assessment Using Input‐Output Techniques , 1999 .

[22]  F. Duchin.  Industrial input-output analysis: implications for industrial ecology. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Ross Cullen,et al.  New methodology for the ecological footprint with an application to the New Zealand economy , 1998 .

[24]  Richard E. Quandt,et al.  On the solution of probabilistic leontief systems , 1959 .

[25]  Dennis Trewin,et al.  Australian national accounts : input-output tables , 1973 .

[26]  Ian Moffatt,et al.  Ecological footprints and sustainable development , 2000 .

[27]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  An Application of a Modified Ecological Footprint Method and Structural Path Analysis in a Comparative Institutional Study , 2003 .

[28]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  A guide for compiling inventories in hybrid life-cycle assessments: some Australian results , 2002 .

[29]  Erwin H. Bulte,et al.  The ecological footprint: useful science or politics? , 2000 .

[30]  Clark W. Bullard,et al.  Net energy analysis : handbook for combining process and input-output analysis , 1976 .

[31]  K. Flint.  Institutional ecological footprint analysis ‐ A case study of the University of Newcastle, Australia , 2001 .

[32]  Robert Dixon,et al.  Inter‐Industry Transactions and Input‐Output Analysis , 1996 .

[33]  John Barrett,et al.  Component ecological footprint: developing sustainable scenarios , 2001 .

[34]  C. Hendrickson,et al.  Using input-output analysis to estimate economy-wide discharges , 1995 .

[35]  Walter Isard,et al.  ON THE LINKAGE OF SOCIO‐ECONOMIC AND ECOLOGIC SYSTEMS , 1968 .

[36]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment , 1995, Environment and Development Economics.

[37]  Jacques Defourny,et al.  STRUCTURAL PATH ANALYSIS AND MULTIPLIER DECOMPOSITION WITHIN A SOCIAL ACCOUNTING MATRIX FRAMEWORK , 1984 .

[38]  Craig Simmons,et al.  Footprinting UK households: How big is your ecological garden? , 1998 .

[39]  Jiun-Jiun Ferng,et al.  Toward a scenario analysis framework for energy footprints , 2002 .

[40]  Graham J. Treloar,et al.  Comprehensive embodied energy analysis framework , 1998 .

[41]  J. Bergh,et al.  Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of the ‘ecological footprint’ , 1999 .

[42]  Gene Bazan.  Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth , 1997 .

[43]  Thomas Köllner,et al.  Species-pool effect potentials (SPEP) as a yardstick to evaluate land-use impacts on biodiversity , 2000 .

[44]  G. Treloar.  Extracting Embodied Energy Paths from Input–Output Tables: Towards an Input–Output-based Hybrid Energy Analysis Method , 1997 .

[45]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  The ecological footprint of Santiago de Chile , 1998 .

[46]  R. Levett.  Footprinting: A great step forward, but tread carefully — a response to Mathis Wackernagel , 1998 .

[47]  Robert Costanza,et al.  The dynamics of the ecological footprint concept , 2000 .

[48]  R. J. Hobbs,et al.  From frontier to fragments: European impact on Australia's vegetation [degradation; rehabilitation]. [Symposium paper] , 1990 .

[49]  Yves Crama,et al.  Structural decomposition of multipliers in input-output or social accounting matrix analysis , 1984, Économie appliquée.

[50]  Thomas S. Lough,et al.  Energy analysis of the structures of industrial organizations , 1996 .