CD34+ stem cell recovery after positive selection of "overloaded" immunomagnetic columns.

Techniques for CD34+ cell enrichment of hematopoietic progenitor cells in grafts destined for transplantation of certain patients with the aim of lowering the amount of infused T lymphocytes and subsequently decreasing the risk of graft versus host disease (GVHD) have been well developed. Adaptations of these techniques should be useful for isolation of other phenotypically defined stem cells. However, a major limitation of techniques now available consists of the number of total nucleated cells or phenotypically defined stem cells that can be processed in a single procedure. Here, we show that recommended levels are much lower than the levels of cells that can be effectively processed by immunomagnetic sorting. Twenty-nine procedures were performed using the Clini- MACS (Miltenyi Biotec) device, which is recommended for processing <6x10(10 )total nucleated cells or <6x10(8) CD34+ cells. Procedures were divided in groups according to their total cellular or CD34+ cell content. We achieved a median CD34+ cell recovery of 68.60% with a median purity of 98.56%, regardless of the loading dose when samples possessing 2-10x10(10) total nucleated cells and 0.8-12.5x10(8) CD34+ cells were applied to a single column. The median levels of CD3+ cells and CD19+ cells in the final product were depleted by 5 logs and 3.8 logs, respectively; no differences were noted when the initial loading dose was increased. Moreover, we found no correlation between the total number nucleated or CD34+ cells loaded and the resultant CD34+ cell recovery. In conclusion, levels of both total nucleated cells and CD34+ can be processed in a single procedure with satisfactory and similar CD34+ cell recovery when these columns are loaded with up to two times as many cells as recommended.

[1]  R. Schlenk,et al.  CD34+ cell selection of peripheral blood progenitor cells using the CliniMACS device for allogeneic transplantation: clinical results in 102 patients , 2004, British journal of haematology.

[2]  M. Labopin,et al.  Transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells as compared with bone marrow from HLA-identical siblings in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  G. Ehninger,et al.  CD34+‐enriched peripheral blood progenitor cells from unrelated donors for allografting of adult patients: high risk of graft failure, infection and relapse despite donor lymphocyte add‐back , 2002, British journal of haematology.

[4]  R. Handgretinger,et al.  A large-scale method for T cell depletion: towards graft engineering of mobilized peripheral blood stem cells , 2002, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[5]  A. Khwaja,et al.  Variable product purity and functional capacity after CD34 selection: a direct comparison of the CliniMACS® (v2·1) and Isolex® 300i (v2·5) clinical scale devices , 2002, British journal of haematology.

[6]  J. Edwards,et al.  CD34 selection using three immunoselection devices: comparison of T-cell depleted allografts. , 2001, Cytotherapy.

[7]  K. Cleary,et al.  Chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation. , 2001, Blood.

[8]  A. Gratwohl,et al.  Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation activity in Europe 1999 , 2001, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[9]  R. Handgretinger,et al.  A one-step large-scale method for T- and B-cell depletion of mobilized PBSC for allogeneic transplantation. , 2004, Cytotherapy.