Co-authorship pair distribution patterns by gender

[1]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[2]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Accessibility of Cities in the Digital Economy , 2004, cond-mat/0412004.

[3]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  Who Is Collaborating with Whom in Science? Explanation of a Fundamental Principle , 2013 .

[4]  Edward Krupat,et al.  Experiencing the Culture of Academic Medicine: Gender Matters, A National Study , 2013, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[5]  D. Beaver,et al.  Gender bias in journals of gender studies , 2012, Scientometrics.

[6]  Ricardo B. Duque,et al.  Gender, ICTs, and Productivity in Low-Income Countries , 2012 .

[7]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  Co-author Pairs’ frequencies of the National Physical Laboratory India , 2010 .

[8]  Peter Conrad,et al.  Collaboration in Academic Medicine: Reflections on Gender and Advancement , 2009, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[9]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  Distribution of Co-Author Pairs’ Frequencies of the Journal of Information Technology , 2008 .

[10]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  Collaboration and Productivity: an investigation into ‘Scientometrics’ journal and ‘UHasselt’ repository , 2008 .

[11]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  Studies in Co-authorship Pairs Distribution: Part-1 , 2008 .

[12]  Steven A. Morris,et al.  Manifestation of research teams in journal literature: A growth model of papers, authors, collaboration, coauthorship, weak ties, and Lotka's law , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  Collaboration structures between German immunology institutions, and gender visibility, as reflected in the Web , 2006 .

[14]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  New indicators for gender studies in Web networks , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[15]  M. Newman.  Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law , 2005 .

[16]  M. Newman.  Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Mustafa Özbilgin,et al.  The gendered nature of career development of university professors: the case of Turkey , 2004 .

[18]  M E Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  Mustafa Özbilgin,et al.  Sex equality in the financial services sector in Turkey and the UK , 1999 .

[20]  Svein Kyvik,et al.  Child Care, Research Collaboration, and Gender Differences in Scientific Productivity , 1996 .

[21]  Bülent Özel,et al.  Link and Node Analysis of Gender Based Collaborations in Turkish Social Sciences , 2012, 2012 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.

[22]  Danièle Meulders,et al.  She Figures 2009 – Statistics and Indicators on Gender Equality in Science , 2009 .

[23]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  Varying Shapes of Co-author PairsDistributions * , 2008 .

[24]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  Lotka's distribution and distribution of co-author pairs' frequencies , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[25]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research , 2005 .

[26]  Adriana Valente,et al.  Scientific and Technological Performance by Gender , 2004 .

[27]  Anja Vogler,et al.  An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 2004 .

[28]  G. Melin.  Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level , 2000 .

[29]  R Boissoneau,et al.  A national study: the use of specialty surgical teams. , 1997, Journal of hospital marketing.

[30]  D. Price.  Little Science, Big Science , 1965 .

[31]  Alfred J. Lotka,et al.  The frequency distribution of scientific productivity , 1926 .