Searching for serial refreshing in working memory: Using response times to track the content of the focus of attention over time

One popular idea is that, to support the maintenance of a set of elements over brief periods of time, the focus of attention rotates among the different elements, thereby serially refreshing the content of working memory (WM). In the research reported here, probe letters were presented between to-be-remembered letters, and response times to these probes were used to infer the status of the different items in WM. If the focus of attention cycles from one item to the next, its content should be different at different points in time, and this should be reflected in a change in the response time patterns over time. Across a set of four experiments, we demonstrated a striking pattern of invariance in the response time patterns over time, suggesting either that the content of the focus of attention did not change over time or that response times cannot be used to infer the content of the focus of attention. We discuss how this pattern constrains models of WM, attention, and human information processing.

[1]  Brian McElree,et al.  Accessing Recent Events , 2006 .

[2]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  The consequence of refreshing for access to nonselected items in young and older adults , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[3]  N. Cowan.  Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework , 1995 .

[4]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  The impact of storage on processing: how is information maintained in working memory? , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Adaptive choice between articulatory rehearsal and attentional refreshing in verbal working memory , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[6]  K. Oberauer,et al.  Attention to Information in Working Memory , 2012 .

[7]  John Jonides,et al.  Neural correlates of access to short-term memory , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  John Jonides,et al.  Trisecting representational states in short-term memory , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[9]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Modeling working memory: a computational implementation of the Time-Based Resource-Sharing theory , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  Sophie Portrat,et al.  The impact of cognitive load on delayed recall , 2014, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[11]  C. Clifton,et al.  Effects of serial position and delay of probe in a memory scan task. , 1970 .

[12]  Ronald Okada,et al.  Serial position effects in high-speed memory search , 1971 .

[13]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Attending to items in working memory: evidence that refreshing and memory search are closely related , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  Long-term semantic representations moderate the effect of attentional refreshing on episodic memory , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[16]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition , 1989 .

[17]  Lila Davachi,et al.  Are Representations in Working Memory Distinct From Representations in Long-Term Memory? , 2010, Psychological science.

[18]  N. Cowan.  The focus of attention as observed in visual working memory tasks: Making sense of competing claims , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Alessandra S. Souza,et al.  Refreshing memory traces: thinking of an item improves retrieval from visual working memory , 2015, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[20]  David P McCabe,et al.  The Role of Covert Retrieval in Working Memory Span Tasks: Evidence from Delayed Recall Tests. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[21]  Pierre Barrouillet,et al.  As Time Goes By , 2012 .

[22]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs , 2012 .