Coupled differentiation and division of embryonic stem cells inferred from clonal snapshots

The deluge of single-cell data obtained by sequencing, imaging and epigenetic markers has led to an increasingly detailed description of cell state. However, it remains challenging to identify how cells transition between different states, in part because data are typically limited to snapshots in time. A prerequisite for inferring cell state transitions from such snapshots is to distinguish whether transitions are coupled to cell divisions. To address this, we present two minimal branching process models of cell division and differentiation in a well-mixed population. These models describe dynamics where differentiation and division are coupled or uncoupled. For each model, we derive analytic expressions for each subpopulation's mean and variance and for the likelihood, allowing exact Bayesian parameter inference and model selection in the idealised case of fully observed trajectories of differentiation and division events. In the case of snapshots, we present a sample path algorithm and use this to predict optimal temporal spacing of measurements for experimental design. We then apply this methodology to an \textit{in vitro} dataset assaying the clonal growth of epiblast stem cells in culture conditions promoting self-renewal or differentiation. Here, the larger number of cell states necessitates approximate Bayesian computation. For both culture conditions, our inference supports the model where cell state transitions are coupled to division. For culture conditions promoting differentiation, our analysis indicates a possible shift in dynamics, with these processes becoming more coupled over time.

[1]  P. Moschopoulos,et al.  The distribution of the sum of independent gamma random variables , 1985 .

[2]  Allon M. Klein,et al.  Spatiotemporal coordination of stem cell commitment during epidermal homeostasis , 2016, Science.

[3]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo , 2011 .

[4]  Petros Dellaportas,et al.  On Bayesian model and variable selection using MCMC , 2002, Stat. Comput..

[5]  Darren J. Wilkinson Stochastic Modelling for Systems Biology , 2006 .

[6]  Yvan Saeys,et al.  A comparison of single-cell trajectory inference methods , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  Jan Hasenauer,et al.  pyABC: distributed, likelihood-free inference , 2017, bioRxiv.

[8]  Amsha Proag,et al.  Apoptotic forces in tissue morphogenesis , 2017, Mechanisms of Development.

[9]  Ramon Grima,et al.  Approximation and inference methods for stochastic biochemical kinetics—a tutorial review , 2016, 1608.06582.

[10]  Louis Anthony Cox,et al.  Wiley encyclopedia of operations research and management science , 2011 .

[11]  Philip K Maini,et al.  A mathematical insight into cell labelling experiments for clonal analysis , 2019, Journal of anatomy.

[12]  Jean-Michel Marin,et al.  Likelihood-Free Model Choice , 2015, Handbook of Approximate Bayesian Computation.

[13]  Patrick S. Stumpf,et al.  Theory of cell fate , 2019, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.

[14]  Jan Hasenauer,et al.  Inferring population dynamics from single-cell RNA-sequencing time series data , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  Samantha A. Morris The evolving concept of cell identity in the single cell era , 2019, Development.

[16]  M. Rattray,et al.  Quantitative single-cell live imaging links HES5 dynamics with cell-state and fate in murine neurogenesis , 2019, Nature Communications.

[17]  Mark M. Tanaka,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo without likelihoods , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Samuel Kotz,et al.  Discrete Distributions: Distributions in Statistics , 1971 .

[19]  Caleb Weinreb,et al.  Fundamental limits on dynamic inference from single-cell snapshots , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Will Macnair,et al.  Dynamic distribution decomposition for single-cell snapshot time series identifies subpopulations and trajectories during iPSC reprogramming , 2020, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  Elijah Roberts,et al.  Approximation and inference methods for stochastic biochemical kinetics—a tutorial review , 2017 .

[22]  S. Chib Marginal Likelihood from the Gibbs Output , 1995 .

[23]  Philip Greulich,et al.  Dynamic heterogeneity as a strategy of stem cell self-renewal , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Christian A. Yates,et al.  The invasion speed of cell migration models with realistic cell cycle time distributions. , 2018, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  Helen M Byrne,et al.  Bayesian inference of agent-based models: a tool for studying kidney branching morphogenesis , 2017, Journal of Mathematical Biology.

[26]  G. Blin,et al.  Distinct Wnt-driven primitive streak-like populations reflect in vivo lineage precursors , 2014, Development.

[27]  J. Davis Univariate Discrete Distributions , 2006 .

[28]  David Welch,et al.  Approximate Bayesian computation scheme for parameter inference and model selection in dynamical systems , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[29]  A. Pettitt,et al.  Marginal likelihood estimation via power posteriors , 2008 .

[30]  Mark A. Girolami,et al.  Estimating Bayes factors via thermodynamic integration and population MCMC , 2009, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[31]  Yanan Fan,et al.  Handbook of Approximate Bayesian Computation , 2018 .

[32]  Jean-Marie Cornuet,et al.  ABC model choice via random forests , 2014, 1406.6288.

[33]  M. Newton,et al.  Estimating the Integrated Likelihood via Posterior Simulation Using the Harmonic Mean Identity , 2006 .

[34]  Ruth E. Baker,et al.  Capabilities and Limitations of Tissue Size Control through Passive Mechanical Forces , 2015, bioRxiv.

[35]  Fabian J. Theis,et al.  Concepts and limitations for learning developmental trajectories from single cell genomics , 2019, Development.

[36]  D. W. Scott,et al.  Multivariate Density Estimation, Theory, Practice and Visualization , 1992 .

[37]  Allon M. Klein,et al.  Homeostatic Epidermal Stem Cell Self-Renewal Is Driven by Local Differentiation. , 2018, Cell stem cell.

[38]  Patrick S. Stumpf,et al.  Stem Cell Differentiation as a Non-Markov Stochastic Process , 2017, Cell systems.

[39]  Ruth E. Baker,et al.  Practical parameter identifiability for spatio-temporal models of cell invasion , 2020, Journal of the Royal Society Interface.

[40]  Jacob C. Kimmel,et al.  Aging induces aberrant state transition kinetics in murine muscle stem cells , 2019, bioRxiv.

[41]  D. Cox The analysis of non-Markovian stochastic processes by the inclusion of supplementary variables , 1955, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[42]  K. Page,et al.  Neuronal differentiation influences progenitor arrangement in the vertebrate neuroepithelium , 2019, Development.

[43]  R. Courant,et al.  Methoden der mathematischen Physik , .

[44]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Continuous Multivariate Distributions, Volume 1: Models and Applications , 2019 .

[45]  Jean-Michel Marin,et al.  ABC methods for model choice in Gibbs random fields , 2008 .