The North Carolina State University Libraries Search Experience: Usability Testing Tabbed Search Interfaces for Academic Libraries

Creating a learnable, effective, and user-friendly library Web site hinges on providing easy access to search. Designing a search interface for academic libraries can be particularly challenging given the complexity and range of searchable library collections, such as bibliographic databases, electronic journals, and article search silos. Library Web designers must decide whether to present users with a single search interface—one that searches across content silos by default—or to offer an interface that exposes the various silos available. Designers must also contend with the user's entire search experience and determine how search should appear on the library home page as well as in global navigation systems. In the spring of 2010, the North Carolina State University Libraries sought to answer search design questions for an upcoming Web site design effort. The Libraries evaluated two different search interfaces to determine whether a tabbed search approach with options to pre-select silos is an effective design for end users. Findings show that a tabbed search interface is an effective design device for presenting multiple silos. This study outlines the methods the North Carolina State University Libraries used to conduct usability testing as well as observations, findings, and recommendations about effective design of search on academic library Web sites.

[1]  Debora Shaw,et al.  Handbook of usability testing: How to plan, design, and conduct effective tests , 1996 .

[2]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Guerrilla HCI: using discount usability engineering to penetrate the intimidation barrier , 1994 .

[3]  Ed Tallent,et al.  Metasearching in Boston College Libraries – a case study of user reactions , 2004 .

[4]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  A review of Web searching studies and a framework for future research , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  John Boyd,et al.  The One-Box Challenge: Providing a Federated Search That Benefits the Research Process , 2006 .

[6]  Tamar Sadeh,et al.  User experience in the library: a case study , 2008 .

[7]  Mike Kuniavsky,et al.  Observing the User Experience: A Practitioner's Guide to User Research (Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies) (The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies) , 2003 .

[8]  Jody Condit Fagan Use of an academic library Web site search engine , 2002 .

[9]  Barbara Valentine,et al.  Undergraduate research behavior: Using focus groups to generate theory , 1993 .

[10]  Jimmy Ghaphery,et al.  Designing Search: Effective Search Interfaces for Academic Library Web Sites , 2008 .

[11]  Abe Korah,et al.  Students and Federated Searching: A Survey of Use and Satisfaction , 2010 .

[12]  Jina Choi Wakimoto,et al.  Does Interface Design Influence Catalog Use? A Case Study , 2009 .

[13]  Peter Brophy,et al.  Student Searching Behavior and the Web: Use of Academic Resources and Google , 2005, Libr. Trends.

[14]  Angela Petit,et al.  Observing the User Experience: A Practitioner's Guide to User Research (Second Edition) [book review] , 2013, IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun..