Objectively Measured Changes in Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Purpose: Physical inactivity and sedentary behavior (SB) are independent risk factors for cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. No studies appear to have investigated whether SB in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) participants changes over time. The aim of this study was to objectively assess physical activity (PA) and SB of CR participants over 6 wks. Methods: Using a prospective cohort study design, 72 CR participants, age = 64.2 ± 9.6 y (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) (79% male), wore an ActiGraph ActiSleep accelerometer for 7 consecutive days at the beginning and end of a 6-wk program to assess daily minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) and SB (<100 counts/min). Other outcomes collected were self-reported MVPA (Active Australia Survey) and SB (Past-Day Adults' Sedentary Time Questionnaire), body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, lipid profile, blood glucose level, quality of life (MacNew), exercise capacity (6-min walk test), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Results: Time spent in MVPA and SB did not change over 6 wks. However, exercise capacity and light-intensity PA significantly improved (P < .01). On average, participants spent 11.8 ± 1.1 hr daily in SB, with 9.5 ± 14.7 min daily in MVPA at the end of the CR program. There was some evidence that males and females had different movement patterns. Conclusions: Levels of PA are low and SB is high in CR participants despite changes in exercise capacity over 6 wks. Participants in CR did increase their PA but only in the light-intensity range. Alternative approaches in CR should be considered to encourage participants to move more and sit less.

[1]  K. Pfeifer,et al.  Physical activity promotion in daily exercise therapy: the perspectives of exercise therapists in German rehabilitation settings , 2019, BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation.

[2]  M. Guazzi,et al.  Assessing Physical Activity as a Core Component in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A POSITION STATEMENT OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CARDIOVASCULAR AND PULMONARY REHABILITATION , 2016, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention.

[3]  S. Prince,et al.  Objectively-measured sedentary time and its association with markers of cardiometabolic health and fitness among cardiac rehabilitation graduates , 2016, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[4]  R. Davey,et al.  Assessing the ‘active couch potato’ phenomenon in cardiac rehabilitation: rationale and study protocol , 2016, BMC Health Services Research.

[5]  Rod S Taylor,et al.  Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  Cate Ferry,et al.  Australian Cardiovascular Health and Rehabilitation Association (ACRA) core components of cardiovascular disease secondary prevention and cardiac rehabilitation 2014. , 2015, Heart, lung & circulation.

[7]  W. Rosamond,et al.  Prevalence of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Among Adults With Cardiovascular Disease in the United States , 2014, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention.

[8]  Paul Dendale,et al.  Secondary prevention in the clinical management of patients with cardiovascular diseases. Core components, standards and outcome measures for referral and delivery , 2014, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[9]  Å. Cider,et al.  The impact on kinesiophobia (fear of movement) by clinical variables for patients with coronary artery disease. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[10]  Emily Banks,et al.  Sitting time and all-cause mortality risk in 222 497 Australian adults. , 2012, Archives of internal medicine.

[11]  L. Adams,et al.  Repeated six-minute walk tests for outcome measurement and exercise prescription in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: a longitudinal study. , 2011, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  J. Casillas,et al.  DETERMINING THE MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT 1 DIFFERENCE FOR THE SIX-MINUTE WALK TEST AND THE 2002 METER FAST WALK TEST DURING CARDIAC REHABILITATION 3 PROGRAM IN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PATIENTS AFTER 4 ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME , 2017 .

[13]  P. Savage,et al.  Pedometer Step Counts Predict Cardiac Risk Factors at Entry to Cardiac Rehabilitation , 2008, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention.

[14]  Henry S Miller,et al.  The physical activity patterns of cardiac rehabilitation program participants. , 2004, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation.

[15]  P S Freedson,et al.  Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  N. Pogosova,et al.  [Secondary prevention in the clinical management of patients with cardiovascular diseases. Core components, standards and outcome measures for referral and delivery]. , 2014, Kardiologiia.