Competition and body size.

If being larger than competing conspecifics is important for fitness, then an unstable escalation of body size may result. In asexual populations, a cycling of sizes can occur but for sexual diploids, an irreversible size increase is more likely. Several factors can produce a stable distribution of sizes, but a single body size or even a narrow range of sizes cannot be stable. For example, enough environmental variance can produce stability without any genetic variability in the population. Or, with no environmental variance, a high cost of fighting between similar sizes or, for diploids, an increasing mortality with size may lead to a stable distribution of sizes. A game theory model is used to investigate the existence and form of a stable distribution of body sizes in a population.

[1]  G. Oster,et al.  Competition, kin selection, and evolutionary stable strategies. , 1978, Theoretical population biology.

[2]  Geoffrey Parker,et al.  SEXUAL SELECTION AND SEXUAL CONFLICT , 1979 .

[3]  Geoff A. Parker,et al.  Arms races in evolution—An ESS to the opponent-independent costs game , 1983 .

[4]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Evolution in Age-Structured Populations , 1984 .

[5]  B. Charlesworth The cost of phenotypic evolution , 1984, Paleobiology.

[6]  J. M. Smith,et al.  Optimization Theory in Evolution , 1978 .

[7]  E. Charnov,et al.  Alternative male life histories in bluegill sunfish. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[9]  J. Haigh,et al.  Evolutionary game auctions. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  John Alcock,et al.  Male Mating Strategies in the Bee Centris pallida Fox (Anthophoridae: Hymenoptera) , 1977, The American Naturalist.