Identification of long-term survivors in primary breast cancer by dynamic modelling of tumour response

Although clinical response to primary chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer is associated with a survival advantage, it is the degree of pathological response in the breast and ipsilateral axilla that best identifies patients with a good long-term outcome. A mathematical model of the initial response of 39 locally advanced tumours to anthracycline-based primary chemotherapy has been previously shown to predict subsequent clinical tumour size. This model allows for the possibility of primary resistant disease, the presence of which should therefore be associated with a worse outcome. This study reports the application of this model to an additional five patients with locally advanced breast cancer, as well as to 63 patients with operable breast cancer, and confirms the biological reality of the model parameters for these 100 breast cancers treated with primary anthracycline-based chemotherapy. The tumours that responded to chemotherapy had higher cell-kill (P < 0.0005), lower resistance (P < 0.0001) and slower tumour regrowth (P < 0.002). Furthermore, ER-negative tumours had higher cell-kill (P < 0.05), as compared with ER-positive tumours. All patients with a pathological complete response had zero resistance according to the model. Furthermore, the long-term implication of chemo-resistant disease was demonstrated by survival analysis of these two groups of patients. At a median follow-up of 3.7 years, there was a statistically significantly worse survival for the 37 patients with locally advanced breast cancer identified by the model to have more than 8% primary resistant tumour (P < 0.003). The specificity of this putative prognostic indicator was confirmed in the 63 patients presenting with operable disease where, at a median follow-up of 7.7 years, those women with a resistant fraction of greater than 8% had a significantly worse survival (P < 0.05). Application of this model to patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy may allow earlier identification of clinically significant resistance and permit intervention with alternative non-cross-resistant therapies such as taxoids. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign

[1]  D. Wickerham,et al.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  Y. Bignon,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 126 operable breast cancers. , 1992, European journal of cancer.

[3]  T. Powles,et al.  Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy in primary breast carcinomas. , 1997, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[4]  E. Mamounas,et al.  Preoperative chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. , 2000, Cancer treatment and research.

[5]  D. Cameron,et al.  Primary systemic therapy for operable breast cancer--10-year survival data after chemotherapy and hormone therapy. , 1997, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  W. L. McGuire,et al.  Breast cancer prognostic factors: evaluation guidelines. , 1991, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  H. Gabra,et al.  Weekly doxorubicin and continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil for advanced breast cancer. , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.

[8]  B. Gusterson,et al.  High complete remission rates with primary neoadjuvant infusional chemotherapy for large early breast cancer. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  R. Reznek,et al.  Using mathematical models to estimate drug resistance and treatment efficacy via CT scan measurements of tumour volume. , 1990, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  W. Gregory,et al.  Mathematical modelling of tumour response in primary breast cancer. , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.

[11]  B. Asselain,et al.  Breast tumour response to primary chemotherapy predicts local and distant control as well as survival. , 1995, European journal of cancer.

[12]  R. Thomlinson,et al.  Measurement and management of carcinoma of the breast. , 1982, Clinical radiology.

[13]  U. Chetty,et al.  Prospective randomized study of surgical morbidity following primary systemic therapy for breast cancer , 1995, The British journal of surgery.

[14]  A. Luini,et al.  Primary chemotherapy to avoid mastectomy in tumors with diameters of three centimeters or more. , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  U. Chetty,et al.  Primary systemic therapy for operable breast cancer. , 1991, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  Anna L. Brown,et al.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  T. Powles,et al.  Randomized trial of chemoendocrine therapy started before or after surgery for treatment of primary breast cancer. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  T. Aas,et al.  Specific P53 mutations are associated with de novo resistance to doxorubicin in breast cancer patients , 1996, Nature Medicine.

[19]  L. Mauriac,et al.  Effects of primary chemotherapy in conservative treatment of breast cancer patients with operable tumors larger than 3 cm. Results of a randomized trial in a single centre. , 1991, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.