Variation in Teen Driver Education by State Requirements and Sociodemographics

OBJECTIVES: There is renewed attention on national standardization of formal driver education (DE) instruction and momentum toward realigning DE with its original goal of producing safer teen drivers. However, teen DE participation rates and how they differ among sociodemographic groups and in states with and without DE requirements remain largely unknown. Thus, our objective was to estimate national teen participation rates in formal classroom and behind-the-wheel DE instruction in relevant demographic subgroups and also estimate subgroup-specific participation rates by presence of a state DE requirement. METHODS: Data were collected via the National Young Driver Survey, administered to a nationally representative sample of 5665 public school 9th- through 11th-graders in Spring 2006. Analyses were restricted to 1770 students with driver licenses. Survey data were weighted to reflect national prevalence estimates. RESULTS: Overall, 78.8% of students reported participating in formal DE. However, in states without DE requirements, more than 1 in 3 students had no formal DE before licensure, and more than half had no behind-the-wheel training. Hispanics, blacks, males, and students with lower academic achievement participated in DE at markedly lower levels than counterparts in states with requirements. Notably, 71% of Hispanic students in states with no requirement received a license without receiving formal DE. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and gender disparities in DE participation may exist in states with no DE requirements. State DE requirements may be an effective strategy to reduce these disparities.

[1]  Susan A Ferguson,et al.  Sixteen-Year-Old Drivers in Fatal Crashes, United States, 2003 , 2005, Traffic injury prevention.

[2]  Alan W Block,et al.  2007 Motor Vehicle Occupant Safety Survey: Driver Education and Graduated Driver Licensing , 2008 .

[3]  Geert Wets,et al.  An evaluation of graduated driver licensing programs in North America using a meta-analytic approach. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Allan F. Williams,et al.  Feasibility study on evaluating driver education curriculum. , 2009 .

[5]  Elizabeth Vermette Curbing Distracted Driving: 2010 Survey of State Safety Programs , 2010 .

[6]  Mike A. Males,et al.  The role of poverty in California teenagers' fatal traffic crash risk. , 2009 .

[7]  J. Culpepper National Center for Educational Statistics , 2007 .

[8]  J T Shope,et al.  Influences on youthful driving behavior and their potential for guiding interventions to reduce crashes , 2006, Injury Prevention.

[9]  Allison E. Curry,et al.  Prevalence of teen driver errors leading to serious motor vehicle crashes. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Michael R. Elliott,et al.  National Young-Driver Survey: Teen Perspective and Experience With Factors That Affect Driving Safety , 2008, Pediatrics.

[11]  Dan Mayhew,et al.  Large-Scale Evaluation of Driver Education: Review of the Literature on Driver Education Evaluation, 2010 Update , 2010 .

[12]  L. Lonero Trends in driver education and training. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[13]  Allan F Williams,et al.  Specific and Long-Term Effects of Nova Scotia's Graduated Licensing Program , 2003, Traffic injury prevention.

[14]  Daniel R Mayhew,et al.  Changes in collision rates among novice drivers during the first months of driving. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Daniel R Mayhew,et al.  Driver education and graduated licensing in North America: past, present, and future. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[16]  Teresa Senserrick,et al.  EVALUATION OF AN INSIGHT DRIVER-TRAINING PROGRAM FOR YOUNG DRIVERS , 2001 .

[17]  P Juarez,et al.  A conceptual framework for reducing risky teen driving behaviors among minority youth , 2006, Injury Prevention.