Interobserver variance in perceptual performance and learning.

PURPOSE Normal observers and patients with apparent disease usually are tacitly expected to yield homogeneous thresholds in clinical tests of visual perception. The authors tested this assumption. METHODS Through training of 70 observers, performance and improvement of performance were tested for different hyperacuity tasks using psychophysical tests. RESULTS Although the assumption of homogeneous results might be true for many tasks limited by the physical properties of the eye, such as two-point resolution, the authors find a relatively wide variation of performance, especially in untrained observers, for tasks that require more elaborate processing in the visual cortex. Observers vary widely both in their baseline performance and in the extent and speed of learning for tasks such as vernier discrimination and stereoscopic depth perception. On average, speed of learning is inversely correlated to baseline performance, that is better initial performance usually is associated with slower improvement. CONCLUSIONS This finding indicates that retesting of unusually high (pathologic) thresholds in clinical tests of visual perception might improve discrimination between patients whose performance is poor because of lack of familiarity with the task and who improve with training and patients who improve far less if their poor performance results from pathologic conditions.

[1]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Attentional control of early perceptual learning. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  D. Glaser,et al.  Initial performance, learning and observer variability for hyperacuity tasks , 1993, Vision Research.

[3]  T Poggio,et al.  Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity. , 1991, Science.

[4]  E. Gibson,et al.  Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1973 .

[5]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Direction-specific improvement in motion discrimination , 1987, Vision Research.

[6]  A. Fiorentini,et al.  Learning in grating waveform discrimination: Specificity for orientation and spatial frequency , 1981, Vision Research.

[7]  T. Poggio,et al.  Fast perceptual learning in hyperacuity , 1995, Vision Research.

[8]  G. Orban,et al.  The effect of practice on the oblique effect in line orientation judgments , 1985, Vision Research.

[9]  H. Pashler,et al.  Improvement in line orientation discrimination is retinally local but dependent on cognitive set , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  A. Fiorentini,et al.  Perceptual learning specific for orientation and spatial frequency , 1980, Nature.

[11]  M. M. Taylor,et al.  PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions , 1967 .

[12]  A. Karni,et al.  The time course of learning a visual skill , 1993, Nature.

[13]  S. McKee,et al.  Improvement in vernier acuity with practice , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  M. Fahle,et al.  An electrophysiological correlate of learning in motion perception. , 1994, German journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  S. Edelman,et al.  Long-term learning in vernier acuity: Effects of stimulus orientation, range and of feedback , 1993, Vision Research.

[16]  M. M. Taylor,et al.  Erratum and Note: PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 41, 782–787 (1967)] , 1967 .

[17]  G. Westheimer,et al.  The effect of training on visual alignment discrimination and grating resolution , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  D Sagi,et al.  Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Shimon Edelman,et al.  Models of Perceptual Learning in Vernier Hyperacuity , 1993, Neural Computation.

[20]  O Braddick,et al.  Orientation-Specific Learning in Stereopsis , 1973, Perception.

[21]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Effects of practice and the separation of test targets on foveal and peripheral stereoacuity , 1983, Vision Research.