The evolution of fairness: explaining variation in bargaining behaviour

Conceptions of fairness vary across the world. Identifying the drivers of this variation is key to understanding the selection pressures and mechanisms that lead to the evolution of fairness in humans. Individuals' varying fairness preferences are widely assumed to represent cultural norms. However, this assumption has not previously been tested. Fairness norms are defined as culturally transmitted equilibria at which bargainers have coordinated expectations from each other. Hence, if fairness norms exist at the level of the ethno-linguistic group, we should observe two patterns. First, cultural conformism should maintain behavioural homogeneity within an ethno-linguistic group. Second, bargainers' expectations should be coordinated such that proposals and responses to proposals should covary. Here we show that neither of these patterns is observed across 21 populations of the same ethno-linguistic group, the Pahari Korwa of central India. Our findings suggest that what constitutes a fair division of resources can vary on smaller scales than that of the ethno-linguistic group. Individuals' local environments may play a central role in determining conceptions of fairness.

[1]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Serotonin Modulates Behavioral Reactions to Unfairness , 2008, Science.

[2]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition , 2000 .

[3]  Rachel T. A. Croson,et al.  Gender Differences in Preferences , 2009 .

[4]  H. Oosterbeek,et al.  Cultural Differences in Ultimatum Game Experiments: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[5]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  Social norms and human cooperation , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[7]  D. Wilson,et al.  Human prosociality from an evolutionary perspective: variation and correlations at a city-wide scale ☆ , 2009 .

[8]  D. Nettle,et al.  Variation in Cooperative Behaviour within a Single City , 2011, PloS one.

[9]  J. Carpenter,et al.  Experiments and Economic Development: Lessons from Field Labs in the Developing World , 2005 .

[10]  Eric Alden Smith,et al.  Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence from Fifteen Small‐Scale Societies , 2006 .

[11]  M. Johannesson,et al.  Heritability of ultimatum game responder behavior , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  J. Henrich,et al.  More ‘altruistic’ punishment in larger societies , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  K. Binmore.  Social norms or social preferences? , 2010 .

[14]  S. Zamir,et al.  Bargaining and Market Behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An Experimental Study , 1991 .

[15]  K. Binmore.  THE EVOLUTION OF FAIRNESS NORMS , 1998 .

[16]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[17]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Foundations of Human Sociality - Economic Experiments and Ethnographic: Evidence From Fifteen Small-Scale Societies , 2004 .

[18]  J. Henrich,et al.  Costly Punishment Across Human Societies , 2006, Science.

[19]  J. Henrich,et al.  Homo Æqualis: A Cross-Society Experimental Analysis of Three Bargaining Games , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[20]  E. Fehr.  A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation , 1998 .

[21]  J. Henrich,et al.  Markets, Religion, Community Size, and the Evolution of Fairness and Punishment , 2010, Science.

[22]  John A. List,et al.  Young, Selfish and Male: Field Evidence of Social Preferences , 2004 .

[23]  Juan Camilo Cárdenas,et al.  Real wealth and experimental cooperation: experiments in the field lab , 2003 .

[24]  Colin Camerer,et al.  “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[25]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .

[26]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  The nature of human altruism , 2003, Nature.

[27]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[28]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game , 2003, Science.

[29]  Ruth Mace,et al.  People recognise when they are really anonymous in an economic game , 2010 .

[30]  Antonio S Silva,et al.  Lost Letter Measure of Variation in Altruistic Behaviour in 20 Neighbourhoods , 2012, PloS one.

[31]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .

[32]  Ruth Mace,et al.  Demography and ecology drive variation in cooperation across human populations , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Hawaii,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S6 Tables S1 and S2 Database S1 Antisocial Punishment across Societies , 2022 .