Robots conquering local government services: A case study of eldercare in Denmark

The movement of robots from the production line to the service sector provides a potentially radical solution to innovate and transform public service delivery. Although robots are increasingly being adopted in service delivery (e.g., healthand eldercare) to enhance and in some cases substitute labour-intensive services, the public administration research community is short on knowledge of the impact on the work processes carried out in public organizations and how staff and clients react toward robots. This case study investigates the implementation and use of robot vacuum cleaners in Danish eldercare, demonstrating how robot vacuums have proven to have considerable interpretive flexibility with variation in the perceived nature of technology, technology strategy, and technology use between key stakeholders in eldercare.

[1]  Martin Ford,et al.  Rise of the robots : technology and the threat of a jobless future , 2015 .

[2]  Christopher Pollitt,et al.  New Perspectives on Public Services: Place and Technology , 2012 .

[3]  Kim Normann Andersen,et al.  Robots on the move from the production line to the service sector: The grand challenges for contractors, workers, and management , 2010, eChallenges e-2010 Conference.

[4]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[5]  A. Huberman,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook , 1994 .

[6]  Sue Newell,et al.  Theorization and Translation in Information Technology Institutionalization: Evidence from Danish Home Care , 2014, MIS Q..

[7]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Robots, Gender & Sensemaking: Sex Segregation’s Impact On Workers Making Sense Of a Mobile Autonomous Robot , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  James N. Danziger,et al.  Computers and Politics: High Technology in American Local Governments , 1982 .

[9]  Debra Wood No longer rocket science: robots have found their place in healthcare. , 2011, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[10]  Rebecca Q. Stafford,et al.  Attitudes and reactions to a healthcare robot. , 2010, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[11]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[12]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Advancing E‐Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare? , 2005 .

[13]  Davide Ravasi,et al.  How Early Implementations Influence Later Adoptions of Innovation: Social Positioning and Skill Reproduction in the Diffusion of Robotic Surgery , 2015 .

[14]  Oskar Jonsson,et al.  STS-inspired design to meet the challenges of modern ageing. Welfare technology as a tool to promote user driven innovations or another way to keep older users hostage? , 2015 .

[15]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Race against the machine : how the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy , 2011 .

[16]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[17]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[18]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[19]  John A. Taylor,et al.  PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND THE INFORMATION POLITY , 1991 .

[20]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Third Edition. , 2014 .

[21]  Virpi Timonen,et al.  Home Care for Ageing Populations: A Comparative Analysis of Domiciliary Care in Denmark, the United States and Germany , 2007 .

[22]  B. Flyvbjerg Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[23]  A. Pettigrew Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[24]  Robert Sparrow,et al.  In the hands of machines? The future of aged care , 2006, Minds and Machines.

[25]  W. Banks,et al.  Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: use of robotic versus living dogs. , 2008, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[26]  K. Weick FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[27]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Robots in organizations: The role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[28]  M. Lohan Constructive Tensions in Feminist Technology Studies , 2000 .

[29]  Angela Lin,et al.  The social and political construction of technological frames , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[30]  W. Orlikowski Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[31]  J. Fountain Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[32]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Simpler : the future of government , 2013 .

[33]  Michael Marien,et al.  Book Review: The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies , 2014 .