Science Outside the Lab: Helping Graduate Students in Science and Engineering Understand the Complexities of Science Policy

Helping scientists and engineers challenge received assumptions about how science, engineering, and society relate is a critical cornerstone for macroethics education. Scientific and engineering research are frequently framed as first steps of a value-free linear model that inexorably leads to societal benefit. Social studies of science and assessments of scientific and engineering research speak to the need for a more critical approach to the noble intentions underlying these assumptions. “Science Outside the Lab” is a program designed to help early-career scientists and engineers understand the complexities of science and engineering policy. Assessment of the program entailed a pre-, post-, and 1 year follow up survey to gauge student perspectives on relationships between science and society, as well as a pre–post concept map exercise to elicit student conceptualizations of science policy. Students leave Science Outside the Lab with greater humility about the role of scientific expertise in science and engineering policy; greater skepticism toward linear notions of scientific advances benefiting society; a deeper, more nuanced understanding of the actors involved in shaping science policy; and a continued appreciation of the contributions of science and engineering to society. The study presents an efficacious program that helps scientists and engineers make inroads into macroethical debates, reframe the ways in which they think about values of science and engineering in society, and more thoughtfully engage with critical mediators of science and society relationships: policy makers and policy processes.

[1]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  Reliability and Validity Assessment , 1979 .

[2]  K. Lonka,et al.  Spontaneous concept maps aiding the understanding of scientific concepts , 1999 .

[3]  Wha-Chul Son,et al.  Philosophy of Technology and Macro-ethics in Engineering , 2008, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[4]  E. Woodhouse,et al.  Science policies for reducing societal inequities , 2007 .

[5]  Shane Connelly,et al.  A Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Training for Scientists: Preliminary Evidence of Training Effectiveness , 2008, Ethics & behavior.

[6]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Comparison of the reliability and validity of scores from two concept‐mapping techniques* , 2001 .

[7]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Mental Models: An Alternative Evaluation of a Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Instruction , 2008, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[8]  David H. Guston.  Between Politics and Science: Understanding the Social Contract for Science , 2000 .

[9]  Jameson M. Wetmore,et al.  Engaging Students in Integrated Ethics Education: A Communication in the Disciplines Study of Pedagogy and Students' Roles in Society , 2014 .

[10]  John Lincourt,et al.  Ethics training: A genuine dilemma for engineering educators , 2004, Science and engineering ethics.

[11]  K. Pimple,et al.  Six domains of research ethics , 2002, Science and engineering ethics.

[12]  Sheila Ja Sanoff.  Ordering knowledge, ordering society: Sheila Jasanoff , 2004 .

[13]  Alberto Regis,et al.  Concept Maps in Chemistry Education. , 1996 .

[14]  Matthew S. Kraatz.  Learning by Association? Interorganizational Networks and Adaptation to Environmental Change , 1998 .

[15]  John Ladd,et al.  The quest for a code of professional ethics: an intellectual and moral confusion , 1985 .

[16]  J. DeCoster.  Scale Construction Notes , 2005 .

[17]  Olusola O. Adesope,et al.  Learning With Concept and Knowledge Maps: A Meta-Analysis , 2006 .

[18]  J. Herkert,et al.  Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics in engineering , 2005, Science and engineering ethics.

[19]  J. Haidt.  The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.

[20]  David F. Channell.  Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1999 .

[21]  Distributional effects of science and technology-based economic development strategies at state level in the United States , 2005 .

[22]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[23]  Penny L. Hirsch,et al.  Enhancing Core Competency Learning in an Integrated Summer Research Experience for Bioengineers , 2005 .

[24]  J. Ziman,et al.  Getting scientists to think about what they are doing , 2001, Science and engineering ethics.

[25]  Heather Douglas.  Pure science and the problem of progress. , 2014, Studies in history and philosophy of science.

[26]  水野 里恵,et al.  脱慣習水準のモラル思考法の発達に「教育」が及ぼす影響--DIT-2(Defining Issues Test 2)測定による青年のモラル判断基準に関する研究 , 2009 .

[27]  M. Cho,et al.  Barriers to Considering Ethical and Societal Implications of Research: Perceptions of Life Scientists , 2012, AJOB primary research.

[28]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Relationships and Unethical Behavior: A Social Network Perspective , 1998 .

[29]  A. Rip,et al.  The past and future of constructive technology assessment , 1997 .

[30]  M. Polanyi.  The Republic of science , 1962 .

[31]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Meaningful assessment of learners' understandings about scientific inquiry—The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire , 2014 .

[32]  R. Pielke,et al.  The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science , 2007 .

[33]  S. Sarkar.  Technological Momentum , 2010 .

[34]  Norman G. Lederman.  Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[35]  C. Lindblom.  THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH , 1959 .

[36]  W. Neuman,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2002 .

[37]  I. Berlin,et al.  The Hedgehog and the Fox: An essay on Tolstoy's View of History , 1954 .

[38]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Public Value Mapping and Science Policy Evaluation , 2011 .

[39]  M. G. Jones,et al.  The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity , 1994 .

[40]  Jason Borenstein,et al.  The Engineering and Science Issues Test (ESIT): A Discipline-Specific Approach to Assessing Moral Judgment , 2010, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[41]  J. Z. Bonilla.  Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal , 2010 .

[42]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Comparison of Two Concept-Mapping Techniques: Implications for Scoring, Interpretation, and Use. , 2005 .

[43]  I. Berlin.  The Hedgehog and the Fox: An essay on Tolstoy's View of History , 1955 .

[44]  S. Shumaker,et al.  Social Support: An Introduction to a Complex Phenomenon , 1984 .

[45]  B. Shore,et al.  Using Concept Mapping for Assessment in Physics. , 1995 .

[46]  J. Herkert,et al.  Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies , 2001, Science and engineering ethics.

[47]  V. Bush.  Science, the Endless Frontier , 1999, Science, the Endless Frontier.

[48]  Harry Dankowicz,et al.  The Importance of Formative Assessment in Science and Engineering Ethics Education: Some Evidence and Practical Advice , 2013, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[49]  Frances L. Behnke.  Reactions of Scientists and Science Teachers to Statements Bearing on Certian Aspects of Science and Science Teaching , 1961 .

[50]  Byron Newberry,et al.  The dilemma of ethics in engineering education , 2004, Science and engineering ethics.

[51]  J. Haidt.  The Emotional Dog Gets Mistaken for a Possum , 2004 .

[52]  Troy A. Murphy.  Deliberative civic education and civil society: a consideration of ideals and actualities in democracy and communication education , 2004 .

[53]  Daniel Metlay,et al.  Decision Strategies for Addressing Complex " Messy " Problems , 2012 .

[54]  Rider W. Foley,et al.  Practitioners’ Views on Responsibility: Applying Nanoethics , 2012 .

[55]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Larry W. Lake,et al.  Grand Challenges for Earth Resources Engineering , 2012 .

[57]  David H. Guston,et al.  Real-time technology assessment , 2020, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[58]  J. Novak.  Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education , 1990 .

[59]  V. Weil.  Making sense of scientists’ responsibilities at the interface of science and society , 2002, Science and engineering ethics.

[60]  J. Pielke.  The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics , 2007 .

[61]  Rider W. Foley,et al.  Building Sustainability Literacy Among Preservice Teachers: An Initial Evaluation of a Sustainability Course Designed for K-8 Educators , 2015 .

[62]  Strand Roger,et al.  What can history teach us about the prospects of a European Research Area , 2013 .

[63]  H. Bernard.  Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1988 .