A new interpretation of kinematic stormflow generation

The paper reviews a number of possible fast and slow hydrological flow mechanisms to account for rapid runoff generation within a catchment. A new interpretation of the kinematic wave process is proposed which develops some of these concepts to explain rapid subsurface flow from a watershed. Evidence for the process is provided by the results from a laboratory soil core experiment and an investigation of the hydrology of a Dartmoor hillslope. A tension response was monitored in the soil core in which pressure waves were propagated downwards and expelled water from the base. The transmission of the wave down the core was considerably faster than the movement of a chloride tracer. The concept of this kinematic wave process and associated water flux was then extended to the Dartmoor watershed. Raindrops reaching the wet soil surface caused pressure waves to travel laterally downslope. During large rainstorms, the hillslope became hydrologically highly connected and the pressure waves forced existing water from seepage faces into the saturated area adjacent to the stream, contributing substantially to the stream discharge. A kinematic contributing area was defined, as determined by both rainfall–runoff ratios and geostatistical analyses of hillslope soil moisture contents, which extended over at least 65% of the catchment area. This kinematic wave theory is consistent with results of translatory flow and macropore flow models, and stable isotope field studies of ‘old/new’ water. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  D. Rowell.  Soil science: methods and applications. , 1994 .

[2]  R. Horton.  The Rôle of infiltration in the hydrologic cycle , 1933 .

[3]  T. Dunne,et al.  Relation of field studies and modeling in the prediction of storm runoff , 1983 .

[4]  R. Gillham.  The capillary fringe and its effect on water-table response , 1984 .

[5]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Isotope tracers in catchment hydrology , 1998 .

[6]  D. Scholefield,et al.  Investigating preferential flow in a large intact soil block under pasture , 2000 .

[7]  Malcolm G. Anderson,et al.  Advances in Hillslope Processes , 1996 .

[8]  R. Betson,et al.  What is watershed runoff , 1964 .

[9]  Glenn V. Wilson,et al.  Physical and chemical controls of preferred path flow through a forested hillslope , 1990 .

[10]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  On the spatial scaling of soil moisture , 1999 .

[11]  Andrew J. Pearce,et al.  Storm Runoff generation in humid headwater catchments 2. A case study of hillslope and low-order stream response , 1986 .

[12]  K. Beven,et al.  Macropores and water flow in soils , 1982 .

[13]  A. Pearce,et al.  Storm runoff generation in humid headwater catchments 1 , 1986 .

[14]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Observed spatial organization of soil moisture and its relation to terrain indices , 1999 .

[15]  P. Kneale,et al.  The influence of low-angled topography on hillslope soil-water convergence and stream discharge , 1982 .

[16]  M. Bonell.  Progress in the understanding of runoff generation dynamics in forests , 1993 .

[17]  Keith Beven,et al.  Kinematic Wave Approximation to Infiltration Into Soils With Sorbing Macropores , 1985 .

[18]  M. B. Beck,et al.  Hydrological flow paths at the allt A' mharcaidh catchment: An analysis of plot and catchment scale observations , 1993 .

[19]  Robert W. Gillham,et al.  Field studies of the effects of the capillary fringe on streamflow generation , 1989 .

[20]  K. Kung,et al.  Preferential flow in a sandy vadose zone: 2. Mechanism and implications , 1990 .

[21]  Malcolm G. Anderson,et al.  Process studies in hillslope hydrology. , 1993 .

[22]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  The role of event water, a rapid shallow flow component, and catchment size in summer stormflow , 1999 .

[23]  M. B. Beck,et al.  Hydrological processes on the plot and hillslope scale. , 1990 .

[24]  Randall J. Charbeneau,et al.  Kinematic Models for Soil Moisture and Solute Transport , 1984 .

[25]  Modelling Hillslope Soil Water Status during Drainage , 1982 .

[26]  R. D. Black,et al.  Partial Area Contributions to Storm Runoff in a Small New England Watershed , 1970 .

[27]  Roger E. Smith.  Approximate Soil Water Movement by Kinematic Characteristics1 , 1983 .

[28]  R. J. Luxmoore,et al.  Subsurface water flow simulated for hillslopes with spatially dependent soil hydraulic characteristics , 1987 .

[29]  J. Hewlett.  Factors affecting the response of small watersheds to precipitation in humid areas , 1967 .

[30]  L. Gottschalk,et al.  Kinematic wave approximations to hillslope hydrological processes in tills. , 2000 .

[31]  A. Williams,et al.  Soil moisture variability in a semi-arid gully catchment: implications for runoff and erosion control , 1998 .

[32]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Preferred states in spatial soil moisture patterns: Local and nonlocal controls , 1997 .

[33]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  A rationale for old water discharge through macropores in a steep, humid catchment. , 1990 .

[34]  Todd C. Rasmussen,et al.  Tracer vs. pressure wave velocities through unsaturated saprolite , 2000 .

[35]  Martin Kent,et al.  Some observations on the chemical weathering of the Dartmoor granite , 1986 .