Current role of stroboscopy in laryngeal imaging

Purpose of reviewTo summarize recent technological advancements and insight into the role of stroboscopy in laryngeal imaging. Recent findingsAlthough stroboscopic technology has not undergone major technological improvements, recent clarifications have been made to the application of stroboscopic principles to video-based laryngeal imaging. Also recent advances in coupling stroboscopy with high-definition video cameras provide higher spatial resolution of vocal fold vibratory function during phonation. Studies indicate that the interrater reliability of visual stroboscopic assessment varies depending on the laryngeal feature being rated and that only a subset of features may be needed to be representative of an entire assessment. High-speed videoendoscopy (HSV) judgments have been shown to be more sensitive than stroboscopy for evaluating vocal fold phase asymmetry, pointing to the future potential of complementing stroboscopy with alternative imaging modalities in hybrid systems. Laryngeal videostroboscopy alone continues to play a central role in clinical voice assessment. Even though HSV may provide more detailed information about phonatory function, its eventual clinical adoption will depend on how remaining practical, technical, and methodological challenges will be met. SummaryLaryngeal videostroboscopy continues to be the modality of choice for imaging vocal fold vibration, but technological advancements in HSV and associated research findings are driving increased interest in the clinical adoption of HSV to complement videostroboscopic assessment.

[1]  吴德恒,et al.  经Co , 1964 .

[2]  R. J. Feder,et al.  Videostroboscopic evaluation of the larynx. , 1987, Ear, nose, & throat journal.

[3]  S. Zeitels,et al.  Premalignant epithelium and microinvasive cancer of the vocal fold: The evolution of phonomicrosurgical management , 1995, The Laryngoscope.

[4]  D. Bless,et al.  A multi-media, computer-based method for stroboscopy rating training. , 1998, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[5]  B J Poburka,et al.  A new stroboscopy rating form. , 1999, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[6]  M. Schuster,et al.  Laser projection in high-speed glottography for high-precision measurements of laryngeal dimensions and dynamics , 2005, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head & Neck.

[7]  Terri Treman Gerlach,et al.  Phase asymmetries in normophonic speakers: visual judgments and objective findings. , 2008, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[8]  Rita R. Patel,et al.  Comparison of High-Speed Digital Imaging with Stroboscopy for Laryngeal Imaging of Glottal Disorders , 2008, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[9]  Ellen S. Deutsch,et al.  Clinical Practice Guideline: Hoarseness (Dysphonia) , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[10]  K. Kendall High-speed laryngeal imaging compared with videostroboscopy in healthy subjects. , 2009, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[11]  R. Hillman,et al.  State of the art laryngeal imaging: research and clinical implications , 2010, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[12]  Robert E. Hillman,et al.  Commentary on why laryngeal stroboscopy really works: clarifying misconceptions surrounding Talbot's law and the persistence of vision. , 2010, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[13]  Katherine A. Kendall,et al.  Laryngeal Evaluation: Indirect Laryngoscopy to High-Speed Digital Imaging , 2010 .

[14]  Daryush D. Mehta,et al.  Voice Production Mechanisms following Phonosurgical Treatment of Early Glottic Cancer , 2010, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[15]  Jack J. Jiang,et al.  Prospective multi‐arm evaluation of surgical treatments for vocal fold scar and pathologic sulcus vocalis , 2011, The Laryngoscope.

[16]  Jack J Jiang,et al.  Mucosal wave measurement and visualization techniques. , 2011, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[17]  R. Colton,et al.  Evaluation of stroboscopic signs. , 2011, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[18]  R. Nuss,et al.  Validation of a Pediatric Vocal Fold Nodule Rating Scale Based on Digital Video Images , 2012, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[19]  Jackie L. Gartner-Schmidt,et al.  A nomenclature paradigm for benign midmembranous vocal fold lesions , 2012, The Laryngoscope.

[20]  L. Kelchner,et al.  Update on pediatric voice and airway disorders: assessment and care , 2012, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[21]  Michael J Pitman,et al.  Evaluation of dysphonic patients by general otolaryngologists. , 2012, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[22]  Uwe Konerding,et al.  The interrater reliability of stroboscopy evaluations. , 2012, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[23]  Terri Treman Gerlach,et al.  Vocal fold phase asymmetries in patients with voice disorders: a study across visualization techniques. , 2012, American journal of speech-language pathology.