Spatial mutation of the T cell immunological synapse.

The hardware for intracellular signaling networks consists of cascades of chemical reactions. It is becoming increasingly apparent that the large-scale spatial organization of molecules in these networks can lead to differential outcomes from otherwise chemically equivalent systems. This has amplified interest in controlled spatial organization as a regulator of cellular signal transduction. In response, a new category of experimentation is developing, in which the spatial positions of signaling molecules in living cells are directly manipulated through mechanical means. These methodologies complement conventional genetic and pharmacological approaches, both of which are chemical in nature, by perturbing the system through exclusively physical mechanisms.

[1]  Morgan Huse,et al.  Agonist/endogenous peptide–MHC heterodimers drive T cell activation and sensitivity , 2005, Nature.

[2]  P. Friedl,et al.  Tuning immune responses: diversity and adaptation of the immunological synapse , 2005, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[3]  Erich Sackmann,et al.  Polymer-supported membranes as models of the cell surface , 2005, Nature.

[4]  Takashi Saito,et al.  Newly generated T cell receptor microclusters initiate and sustain T cell activation by recruitment of Zap70 and SLP-76 , 2005, Nature Immunology.

[5]  J. Groves,et al.  Supported planar bilayers in studies on immune cell adhesion and communication. , 2003, Journal of immunological methods.

[6]  K. Mossman,et al.  Altered TCR Signaling from Geometrically Repatterned Immunological Synapses , 2005, Science.

[7]  N. Burroughs,et al.  Interface accumulation of receptor/ligand couples in lymphocyte activation: methods, mechanisms, and significance , 2002, Immunological reviews.

[8]  Rajat Varma,et al.  Actin and agonist MHC–peptide complex–dependent T cell receptor microclusters as scaffolds for signaling , 2005, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[9]  Takashi Saito,et al.  Immunological synapse and microclusters: the site for recognition and activation of T cells. , 2006, Current opinion in immunology.

[10]  S. Bromley,et al.  The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. , 1999, Science.

[11]  M. Neuberger,et al.  B cells acquire antigen from target cells after synapse formation , 2001, Nature.

[12]  A. Trautmann,et al.  Imaging T‐cell antigen recognition and comparing immunological and neuronal synapses , 2001, Immunology.

[13]  O. Mandelboim,et al.  The human natural killer cell immune synapse. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Junsang Doh,et al.  Immunological synapse arrays: patterned protein surfaces that modulate immunological synapse structure formation in T cells. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Colin R. F. Monks,et al.  Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells , 1998, Nature.

[16]  S. Boxer,et al.  Micropattern formation in supported lipid membranes. , 2002, Accounts of chemical research.

[17]  K E Healy,et al.  Spatial distribution of mammalian cells dictated by material surface chemistry , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[18]  Daniel I. C. Wang,et al.  Engineering cell shape and function. , 1994, Science.

[19]  F. Batista,et al.  B cell recognition of membrane-bound antigen: an exquisite way of sensing ligands. , 2006, Current opinion in immunology.

[20]  Junsang Doh,et al.  Photogenerated polyelectrolyte bilayers from an aqueous-processible photoresist for multicomponent protein patterning. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[21]  J. Goldman,et al.  B Cell Ligand Discrimination Through a Spreading and Contraction Response , 2006, Science.

[22]  J. Bluestone,et al.  Molecular basis of T cell inactivation by CTLA-4. , 1998, Science.

[23]  Arup K Chakraborty,et al.  CD4 enhances T cell sensitivity to antigen by coordinating Lck accumulation at the immunological synapse , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[24]  S. Boxer,et al.  Micropatterning Fluid Lipid Bilayers on Solid Supports , 1997, Science.

[25]  A. Shaw,et al.  Immune synapses in T-cell activation. , 2006, Current opinion in immunology.

[26]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[27]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells , 2002, Nature.

[28]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  T cell-dendritic cell immunological synapses. , 2006, Current opinion in immunology.

[29]  S. Boxer,et al.  Architecture and function of membrane proteins in planar supported bilayers: a study with photosynthetic reaction centers. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[30]  E. Sackmann,et al.  Supported Membranes: Scientific and Practical Applications , 1996, Science.

[31]  Jay T. Groves,et al.  Synaptic pattern formation during cellular recognition , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  D. Goulding,et al.  The Size of the Synaptic Cleft and Distinct Distributions of Filamentous Actin, Ezrin, CD43, and CD45 at Activating and Inhibitory Human NK Cell Immune Synapses 12 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[33]  P. A. van der Merwe,et al.  T-cell receptor triggering is critically dependent on the dimensions of its peptide-MHC ligand , 2005, Nature.

[34]  Takashi Saito,et al.  Dependence of T Cell Antigen Recognition on the Dimensions of an Accessory Receptor–Ligand Complex , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.