The Productivity of Capital in a Period of Slower Growth

THE UNITED STATES has invested a smaller fraction of its gross national product in capital goods than almost any of its major international competitors in the 40 years since 1948. Over this same period, average labor productivity growth in the United States has also been among the slowest. For the first 25 years of the period there was little cause for dissatisfaction. U.S. productivity growth was higher than it was in the prewar years, and the still higher rates in Europe could easily be explained as a catch-up phenomenon. But after 1973 U.S. labor productivity growth fell to only a little more than 1 percent a year, and in the past five years net investment has dropped substantially. Many people have argued that increasing the level of physical investment in the U.S. economy would have a large payout in higher productivity growth. We agree that investment should be increased, but we suspect that the potential productivity improvements are being exaggerated. The issue is important both for economic analysis and for economic policy. If the growth payoff from increasing the capital stock is large, economic policy can concentrate on raising national saving and investment. If the payoff is small, the nation would be wise to bend some of its efforts toward other means of improving productivity growth. From the perspective of economic analysis, we want to know how to

[1]  P. Romer,et al.  International Trade with Endogenous Technological Change , 1991 .

[2]  P. Romer Capital, Labor, and Productivity , 1991 .

[3]  Kenneth L. Sokoloff,et al.  The Democratization of Invention During Early Industrialization: Evidence from the United States, 1790–1846 , 1989, The Journal of Economic History.

[4]  P. Romer Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  R. Barro Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogeneous Growth , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  Dale W. Jorgenson,et al.  Productivity and Economic Growth , 1990 .

[7]  Albert M. Bottoms,et al.  Made in America: Regaining the Productive Edge , 1990 .

[8]  W. Baumol,et al.  Productivity and American Leadership: The Long View , 1989 .

[9]  P. Romer Increasing Returns and New Developments in the Theory of Growth , 1989 .

[10]  R. Hall,et al.  Invariance Properties of Solow&Apos;S Productivity Residual , 1989 .

[11]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  Growth and Welfare in a Small Open Economy , 1989 .

[12]  M. Dertouzos,et al.  Made in America: Regaining the Productive Edge , 1989 .

[13]  Dale W. Jorgenson,et al.  The Accumulation of Human and Nonhuman Capital, 1948-84 , 1989 .

[14]  G. Grossman,et al.  Comparative Advantage and Long-Run Growth , 1989 .

[15]  C. Steindel,et al.  Evaluating recent trends in capital formation , 1989 .

[16]  Robert E. Hall,et al.  Industry Rents: Evidence and Implications , 1989 .

[17]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Productivity Puzzles and R&D: Another Nonexplanation , 1988 .

[18]  Kenneth L. Sokoloff,et al.  Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America: Evidence From Patent Records, 1790–1846 , 1988, The Journal of Economic History.

[19]  R. Lucas On the Mechanics of Economic Development , 1988 .

[20]  R. Freeman Evaluating the European View that the Us Has No Unemployment Problem , 1988 .

[21]  Robert Summers,et al.  A NEW SET OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS OF REAL PRODUCT AND PRICE LEVELS ESTIMATES FOR 130 COUNTRIES, 1950–1985 , 1988 .

[22]  James W. Robertson,et al.  Energy, Obsolescence, and the Productivity Slowdown , 1987 .

[23]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[24]  P. Romer Crazy Explanations for the Productivity Slowdown , 1987, NBER Macroeconomics Annual.

[25]  Paul M. Romer,et al.  Growth Based on Increasing Returns Due to Specialization , 1987 .

[26]  P. Romer Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[27]  Martin Neil Baily The Productivity Growth Slowdown by Industry , 1982 .

[28]  Wilfred J. Ethier National and International Returns to Scale in the Modern Theory of International Trade , 1982 .

[29]  C. Hulten,et al.  The estimation of economic depreciation using vintage asset prices: An application of the Box-Cox power transformation , 1981 .

[30]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[31]  C. Hulten On the "Importance" of Productivity Change , 1979 .

[32]  A. Dixit,et al.  Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity , 1977 .

[33]  Richard R. Nelson Recent Exercises in Growth Accounting: New Understanding or Dead End? , 1973 .

[34]  G. Psacharopoulos,et al.  Investment in Human Capital. , 1972 .

[35]  W. Nordhaus The Worldwide Wage Explosion , 1972 .

[36]  B. Thomas,et al.  Output, Employment, and Productivity in the United States after 1800. , 1968 .

[37]  Z. Griliches,et al.  The Explanation of Productivity Change , 1967 .

[38]  A. Thatcher Output, Employment and Productivity in the United States after 1800 , 1967 .

[39]  R. Gallman Gross National Product in the United States, 1834–1909 , 1966 .

[40]  Gary Fromm,et al.  The Sources of Economic Growth in the United States and the Alternatives Before Us. , 1963 .

[41]  Edmund S. Phelps,et al.  The New View of Investment: A Neoclassical Analysis , 1962 .

[42]  K. Arrow The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[43]  Robert E. Gallman,et al.  Productivity Trends in the United States. , 1962 .

[44]  R. Solow TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION , 1957 .

[45]  Moses Abramovitz,et al.  Resources and Output Trends in the United States since 1870. , 1957 .

[46]  R. Solow A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth , 1956 .

[47]  E. Rothbarth,et al.  Causes of the Superior Efficiency of U.S.A. Industry as Compared with British Industry , 1946 .